Theoretical study of the obstractive effect of an urethral catheter on avoiding parameters;Effet obstructif d'un cathéter urétral sur les paramètres mictionnels : Étude théorique

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 361-370

  Valentini, Françoise ^a,b   Besson, Gilbert ^a   Nelson, Pierre ^a  

^a HÔPITAL CHARLES FOIX   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Micturition, uroflowmetry; Pressure Flow study; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CATHETERIZATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MICTURITION; PHYSIOLOGY; URETHRA; URODYNAMICS;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; URETHRA; URINARY CATHETERIZATION; URINATION; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0346408584     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ANIKWE R.M. The effect of a 6FG urethral catheter on urinary flow in benign prostatic hypertrophy. Int. Surg., 1976, 61, 417-418.
2. BATES C.G., ARNOLD E.P., GRIFFITHS D.J. The nature of the abnormality in bladder neck obstruction. Br. J. Urol., 1975, 47, 651-656.
3. BESSON G., VALENTINI F., NELSON P.: Progress in the theory of flow through the urethra during micturition. In: International Continence Society, 26th annual meeting. Ed. G.A. Barbalias, Bologna. Monduzzi Editore, 1996, 39-43.
4. CIOFU C., HAAB F. POUYA M. et al. Influence du cathéter urétral sur les résultats de l'étude pression-débit: étude prospective chez 84 patients. Prog. Urol., 1997, 7 suppl. 1, 39A.
5. GALEA G., VAPNEK J.M. Influence of urodynamic catheter size on urinary flow rate and voiding pressure. J. Urol., 1996, 155 suppl., 381A, #281.
6. GIERUP J., RICSON N.O., OKMIAN L. Micturition studies in infants and children. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1970, 4, 209-215.
7. GLEASON D.M., BOTTACCINI M.R. The effect of a fine urethral pressure measuring catheter on urinary flow in females. Neurourol. Urodyn., 1984, 3, 163-171.
8. GLEMAIN P., CORDONNIER J.P., BOCHEREAU C., BARON M., LE NORMAND L., BUZELIN J.M. Incidence de la forme el du calibre dans la résistance uréthrale. Evaluation pout un urètre masculin normal et en cas d'obstruction par hypertrophie de prostate. Prog. Urol., 1993, 3, 995-1015.
9. GRIFFITHS D.J. Urodynamics: the mechanics and hydrodynamics of the lower urinary tract. Bristol U.K.: Adam Hilger, 1980.
10. GRIFFITHS D.J., SCHOLTMEIJER R.J. Precise urodynamic assessment of rneatal and distal urethral stenosis in girls. Neurourol. Urodyn., 1982, 1, 89-95.
11. GRIFFITHS D.J., SCHOLTMEIJER R.J. Precise urodynamic assessment of anatomic urethral obstruction in boys Neurourol. Urodyn., 1982, 1, 97-104.
12. HERMIEU J.F., RAVERY V., DELMAS V., LE COENT R., BOCCON-GIBOT L. et le groupe Epristéride. Effet obstructif d'un cathéter urétral sur la débitmétrie. Prog. Urol., 1997, 7 suppl. 1, 39A.
13. KLINGER H.C., MADERSBACHER S.. SCHMIDBAUER C.P. Impact of different sized catheters on pressure-flow studies in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Neurourol. Urodyn., 1996, 15, 473-481.
14. LOSE G., THUNEDBORG P., COLSTRUP H., JORGENSEN L. Spontaneous versus intubated flow in male patients. Urology, 1988, 32, 553-556.
15. Méthode Valentini, Besson, Nelson. Enveloppe SOLEAU. Institut National de la Protection Industrielle (France), 1995.
16. NEAL D.E., RAO C.V.S., NG T., RAMSDEN P.D. Effects of catheter size on urodynamic measurement in men undergoing elective prostatectomy. Br. J. Urol., 1987, 60, 61-68.
17. OZAWA H., ONO N., ICHIKAWA T. et al. A 4.7 Fr single J catheter is useful for pressure flow study via the urethra. 23rd Annual Meeting ICS, Rome 1993, #288.
18. REID R.E., CHANDDASEKAR D., PUGACH R., LAOR E., TOLIA B.M., FREED S.Z. Effect of varying size of urethral catheters upon flow and resistance measurements. Neurourol. Urodyn., 1986, 5, 227-281.
19. REYNARD J.M., LIM C., SWAMI S., ABRAMS P. The obstructive effect of a urethral catheter. J. Urol., 1996, 79, 901-903.
20. RYALL R.L., MARSHALL V.R. The effect of a urthral catheter on the measurement of maximum urinary flow rate. J. Urol., 1982, 128, 429-432.
21. VALENTINI F., NELSON P. PERRIGOT M. Modélisation mathématique de la miction. Etablissement et utilisation du modèle. Ann. Réadap. Méd. Phys., 1992, 35, 1-10.
22. VALENTINI F., NELSON P. PERRIGOT M. Les écoulements urodynamiques. Ann. Réadap. Méd. Phys., 1994 37, 255-260.
23. VALENTINI F., SABY M-O., BESSON G., NELSON P. Use of a mathematical model to characterize voiding dysfunction induced by a genito-urinary prolapse. 25th Annual Meeting ICS, Sydney.
24. VALENTINI F., BESSON G., MALAVAUD B., NELSON P., SABY M-O., SARRAMON J.P. A mathematical model of micturiton applied to the interpretation of uroflowmetry curves of patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy. J. Urol., 1996, 155, 383A #289.
25. VALENTINI F.A., ZIMMERN P.E., BESSON G., NELSON P.P. Can the anlysis of pressure-flow study by means of a mathematical model of micturition allow to distinguish between primary bladder neck obstruction (BNO) and benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH)? J. Urol., 1997, #1372.
26. Van de BEEK C., BOENDER H., AMBERGEN A., ROLLEMA H.J., JANKNEGT R.A. Comparison of suprapubic and transurethral pressure-flow measurements. 22th Annual Meeting ICS, Prague, 1992, # 127.
27. Von GARRELTS B. Intravesical pressure and urinary flow during micturition in normal subjects. Acta Chir. Scand., 1957, 114, 249-266.
28. WALKER R.M.H., di PASQUALE B., HUBREGTSE M., ST CLAIR CARTER S. Pressure-flow studies in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction: a study comparing suprapubic and transurethral tecchniques. Br. J. Urol., 1997, 79, 693-697.