Impact of different sized catheters on pressure-flow studies in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 473-481

  Klingler, H C ^a   Madersbacher, S ^a   Schmidbauer, C P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

BPH; catheter size; obstruction; pressure flow study

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; BLADDER NECK STENOSIS; BLADDER PRESSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOMETRY; DETRUSOR MUSCLE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; RESIDUAL URINE; URETHRA PRESSURE; URINE CATHETER; URINE FLOW RATE; URODYNAMICS;

AGED; CATHETERIZATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; URINARY BLADDER NECK OBSTRUCTION; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0029747034     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1996)15:5<473::AID-NAU4>3.0.CO;2-C     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abrams PH, Griffiths DJ (1979): The assessment of prostatic obstruction from urodynamic measurements and from residual urine. Br J Urol 51:129-134.
2. Anikwe RM (1976): The effect of a 6 FG urethral catheter on urinary flow in benign prostatic hypertrophy. Int Surg 61(8):417-418.
3. Gierup J, Ericson NO, Okmian L (1970): Micturition studies in infants and children Scand J Urol Nephrol 4:209-215.
4. Gleason DM, Bottaccini MR (1984): The effect of a fine urethral pressure measuring catheter on urinary flow in females. Neurourol Urodyn 3:163-171.
5. Griffiths DJ (1980): "Urodynamics." Bristol, UK: Adam Hilger, pp 102-108.
6. Griffiths DJ, Scholtmeijer RJ (1982): Precise urodynamic assessment of anatomic urethral obstruction in boys. Neurourol Urodyn 1:97-104.
7. Hopkins WF, Pierce JM Jr, Roberts VL (1965): Observation on pressure and flow measurements in the lower urinary tract. J Urol 94:479-482.
8. Jensen KME, Bruskewitz RC, Madsen PO (1984): Urodynamic findings in elderly males without prostatic complaints. Urology 24:2211-2213.
9. Lose G, Jorgensen L (1988): The effect of urethral catheterisation on the urethral sphincter EMG and the urethral closure pressure. Neurourol Urodyn 7: 179-181.
10. Lose G, Thunedborg P, Colstrup H, Jorgensen L (1988): Spontaneous versus intubated flow in male patients. Urology 32:553-556.
11. Neal DE, Rao CVS, Ng T, Ramsden PD (1987): Effects of catheter size on urodynamic measurement in men undergoing elective prostatectomy. Br J Urol 60:61-68
12. Otawa H, Ono N, Ichikawa T, Shidahara K, Oeda T, Kumon H, Ohmori H, Kondo A (1993): A 4 FR single J catheter is useful in pressure flow study via urethra. 23rd Annual Meeting ICS, Rome: Abstract no. 288.
13. Reid RE, Chanddasekar D, Pugach R, Laor E, Tolia BM, Freed SZ (1986): Effect of varying size of urethral catheters upon flow and resistance measurements. Neurourol Urodyn 5:277-281.
14. Ryall RL, Marshall VR (1982): The effect of a urethral catheter on the measurement of maximum urinary flow rate. J Urol 128:429-432.
15. Schäfer W (1995): Analysis of bladder-outlet function with the linearized passive urethral resistance relation, linPURR, and disease-specific approach for grading obstruction: from complex to simple. World J Urol 13:47-58.
16. Spangberg A, Teriö H, Ask P (1990): Pressure-flow-studies in elderly men without voiding problems: Estimation of the urethral pressure/flow relation and urethral elasticity. Neurourol Urodyn 9:123-138.
17. von Garrelts B (1957): Intravesical pressure and urinary flow during micturition in normal subjects. Acta Chir Scand 114:249-266.