Pressure-flow studies in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction: A study comparing suprapubic and transurethral techniques

British Journal of Urology

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 693-697

  Walker, R M H ^a   Pasquale, B D I ^a   Hubregtse, M ^a   Clair Carter, S S T ^a  

^a CHARING CROSS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bladder outlet obstruction; Suprapubic; Transurethral; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BLADDER ASPIRATION; BLADDER NECK STENOSIS; BLADDER PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DETRUSOR MUSCLE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MICTURITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SYMPTOM; URETHRA; URINE CATHETER; URINE FLOW RATE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0031402291     PISSN: 00071331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00143.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Von Garrelts B. Intravesical pressure and urinary flow during micturition in normal subjects. Acta Chir Scand 1957; 114: 49
2. Roos N, Wennberg J, Malenka D et al. Mortality and reoperation after open and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. New Eng J Med 1989; 320: 1120-4
3. Patel A, Royer P, Reddy P, Ramsay J, Carter SSC. Integrated assessment of benign prostatic obstruction. J Urol 1992; 148: 234A
4. Griffiths D, Mastrigt R, Bossch R. Quantification of urethral resistance and bladder function during voiding, with special reference to the effects of prostate size reduction on urethral function due to BPH. Neurourol Urodyn 1989; 8: 17-27
5. Abrams P. Griffiths D. The assessment of prostatic obstruction from urodynamic measurements and from residual urine. Br J Urol 1979; 51: 129-34
6. Lim C. Abrams P. The Abrams-Griffiths nomogram. World J Urol 1995; 13: 34-9
7. Schäfer W. Basic principles and clinical application of advanced analaysis of bladder voiding function. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17: 553-66
8. Schäfer W. Waterbar F. Langen P. Deutz F. A simplified graphical procedure for detailed analysis of detrusor function and outlet function during voiding. Neurourol Urodynam 1989; 8: 405 abstract 78
9. Reynard JM, Lim C, Swami S, Abrams P. The obstructive effect of a urethral catheter. J Urol 1996; 155: 901-3
10. McGuire E. The role of urodynamic investigation in the assessment of benign prostatic hypertrophy. J Urol 1992; 148: 1133
11. Rosier P, de la Rosette J, Koldewijn E, Debruyne F, Wisjkstra H. Variability of pressure-flow analysis parameters in repeated cystometry in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1995; 153: 1520
12. de Wildt M. Rosier P. Witjes W et al. Watchful waiting in the treatment of prostatism complaints: do urodynamic parameters change? Neurourol Urodynam 1994; 13: 394. abstract 33
13. Siris L, Kirkemo A, Jay J. Lack of correlation of the American urological assosciation symptom index with urodynamic bladder outlet obstruction. Neurourol Urodynam 1996; 15: 447-57
14. Klingler H, Madersbacher S, Schmidbauer C. Impact of different sized catheters on pressure-flow studies in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Neurourol Urodynam 1996; 15: 473-81
15. Neal DE, Rao CVS. Styles RA. Ng T. Ramsden PD. Effects of catheter size on urodynamic measurements in men undergoing elective prostatectomy. Br J Urol 1987; 60: 64-8