Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 777-784

  Gutienez, Peter ^a   Roy Wilson, M ^b   Johnson, Chris ^c   Gordon, Mae ^d   Cioffi, George A ^e   Ritch, Robert ^f   Sherwood, Mark ^g   Meng, Karen ^h   Mangione, Carol M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c DREW UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Devers Eye Institute   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h Glaucoma Research Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GLAUCOMA; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL CARE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT PLANNING; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 0030994185     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150779014     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Hays RD. Measurement of visual functioning and healthrelated quality of life in eye disease and cataract surgery. In: Spilker B, ed. Duality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:1045-1051.
2. Janz NK. Implementing quality of life in a clinical trial: the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. In: Anderson DR, Drance SM, eds. Encounters in Glaucoma Research: Ho\v to Ascertain Progression and Outcome. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1996:45-62.
3. Esterman B. Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology. 1982; 89:1226-1234.
4. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Investigators. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study, 2: visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:1589-1595.
5. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989;27(suppl):S217-S232.
6. Damiano AM, Steinberg EP, Cassard SD, et al. Comparison of generic versus disease-specific measures of functional impairment in patients v/ith cataract. Med Care. 1995;33(suppl):AS120-AS130.
7. Applegate WB, Miller ST, Elam JT, Freeman JM, Wood TO, Gettiefinger TC. Impact of cataract surgery with lens implantation on vision and physical function in elderly patients. JAMA. 1987;257:1064-1066.
8. Brenner MH, Curbow B, Javitt JC, Legro MW, Sommer A. Vision change and quality of life in the elderly: response to cataract surgery and treatment of other chronic ocular conditions. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:680-685.
9. Javitt JC, Brenner MH, Curbow B, et al. Outcomes of cataract surgery improvement in visual acuity and subjective visual function after surgery in the first, second, and both eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:630-638.
10. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. National study of cataract surgery outcomes: variation in 4-month postoperative outcomes as reflected in multiple outcome measures. Ophthalmology. 1994:101:1131-1141.
11. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Lawrence MG, et al. Improved visual function and attenuation of age-related declines in health-related quality of life after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1419-1425.
12. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHush PR. The Mini-Mental State Examination: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.
13. Chylack LT Jr, Leske MC, McCarthy D, Khu PM, Kashiwagi T, Sperduto R. Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOGS II). Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:991-997.
14. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF36), I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473483.
15. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-ltem Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), II: psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993:31:247-263.
16. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-ltem Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993:2:217-227.
17. Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1989:262:907-913.
18. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Berry SH, et al. Development of a questionnaire for assessment of visual function: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sd. 1995:36:1962. Abstract.
19. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Berry SH, et al. The NEI-VFQ 51-item test version and its relationship with visual acuity across 5 diseases: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei. 1996;37(suppl):873. Abstract.
20. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. The VF-14: an index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994:112:630-638.
21. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, Mass: Nimrod Press; 1993.
22. Ferris FL, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982:94:91-96.
23. Choplin NT, Edwards RP. Visual Field Testing With the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc; 1995.
24. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health: A Guide to Plating Scales and Questionnaires. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc; 1987.
25. Kravitz RL, Greenfield S, Rogers W, et al. Differences in mix of patients among medical specialties and system of care: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1992;267:1617-1623.
26. Mangione CM, Orav JE, Lawrence MG, Phillips RS, Seddon JH, Goldman L Prediction of visual function after cataract surgery: a prospectively validated model. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995:113:1305-1311.
27. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951:16:297-334.
28. Nunnally, JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co; 1978.
29. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale': a measure of functional status. Med Care. 1992:30:1111-1126.