High order one-step monotonicity-preserving schemes for unsteady compressible flow calculations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 193, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 563-594

  Daru, V ^a,b   Tenaud, C ^b  

^a ARTS ET MÉTIERS PARISTECH   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Compressible flows; High order scheme; Shock capturing scheme; Unsteady flows

Indexed keywords

SHOCK TUBES;

FLOW CALCULATIONS; HIGH-ORDER; HIGH-ORDER SCHEME; HIGHER-ORDER; MONOTONICITY; MULTI-STAGES; SHOCK CAPTURING SCHEME; TEST CASE; TVD SCHEME; UNSTEADY COMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

EID: 0346332033     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.08.023     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. M. Arora, P.L. Roe, A well behaved TVD limiter for high-resolution calculations of unsteady flows, Journal of Computational Physics 132 (1997) 2-11.
2. D.S. Balsara, C.W. Shu, Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy, Journal of Computational Physics 160 (2000) 405-452.
3. C. Bernardi, Y. Maday, Approximations spectrales de problèmes aux limites elliptiques, in: J.M. Ghidagliaet, P. Lascaux (Eds.), Collection Mathématiques & Applications, Springer, Berlin, 1992.
4. C. Canuto, M.Y. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni, T.A. Zang, Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Springer, New York, 1988.
5. J. Casper, Finite-volume implementation of high-order essentially nonoscillatory schemes in two dimensions, AIAA Journal 30 (1992) 2829-2835.
6. B. Cockburn, C.W. Shu, The Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws V, Journal of Computational Physics 141 (1998) 199-224.
7. V. Daru, C. Tenaud, Evaluation of TVD high resolution schemes for unsteady viscous shocked flows, Computers and Fluids 30 (2001) 89-113.
8. F. Ducros, V. Ferrand, F. Nicoud, C. Weber, D. Darracq, C. Gacherieu, T. Poinsot, Large Eddy simulation of shock/turbulence interaction, Journal of Computational Physics 152 (1999) 517-549.
9. A. Harten, B. Engquist, S. Osher, S. Chakravarthy, Uniformly high order essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III, Journal of Computational Physics 71 (1987) 231-303.
10. G.S. Jiang, C.W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, Journal of Computational Physics 12 (1996) 202-228.
11. K. Khalfallah, A. Lerat, Correction d'entropie pour des schémas numériques approchant un système hyperbolique', Comptes Rendus à l'Académie des Sciences 308 II (1989) 815-820.
12. D. Knight, H. Yan, A.G. Panaras, A. Zheltovodov, Advances in CFD prediction of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions, Progress in Aerospace Sciences 39 (2003) 121-184.
13. D. Lax, B. Wendroff, Systems of conservation laws, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 13 (1960) 217-237.
14. S.K. Lele, Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution, Journal of Computational Physics 103 (1992) 16-42.
15. B.P. Leonard, The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 88 (1991) 17-74.
16. M. Lesieur, P. Comte, Large Eddy simulations of compressible turbulent flows, in: Cours AGARD-VKI, Turbulence in Compressible Flows, 1997.
17. K. Mahesh, A family of high-order finite difference schemes with good spectral resolution, Journal of Computational Physics 145 (1998) 332-358.
18. R. Peyret, Spectral Methods With Application to Incompressible Viscous Flow, Springer, Berlin, 2002.
19. C.W. Shu, TVB uniformly high order schemes for conservation laws, Mathematics of Computation 49 (1987) 105-121.
20. C.W. Shu, S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, Journal of Computational Physics 77 (1988) 439-471.
21. C.W. Shu, S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II, Journal of Computational Physics 83 (1989) 32-79.
22. C.W. Shu, T.A. Zang, G. Erlebacher, D. Whitaker, S. Osher, High order ENO schemes applied to two- and three-dimensional compressible flows, Applied Numerical Mathematics: Transactions of IMACS 9 (1992) 45-71.
23. C.W. Shu, Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, NASA/CR-97-206253 and ICASE Report, 1997 pp. 97-165.
24. B. Sjogreen, H.C. Yee, Grid convergence of high order methods for multiscale complex unsteady viscous compressible flows, Journal of Computational Physics 185 (2003) 1-26.
25. A. Suresh, H.T. Huynh, Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with Runge-Kutta time stepping, Journal of Computational Physics 136 (1997) 83-99.
26. V.A. Titarev, E.F. Toro, ADER: arbitrary high order Godunov approach, Journal of Scientific Computing 17 (1-4) (2002) 609-618.
27. C. Tenaud, E. Garnier, P. Sagaut, Evaluation of some high-order shock capturing schemes for direct numerical simulation of unsteady two-dimensional free flows, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 126 (2000) 202-228.
28. P. Woodward, P. Collela, The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, Journal of Computational Physics 54 (1984) 115-173.