Distribution of Deciduous Stands in Villages Located in Coniferous Forest Landscapes in Sweden

Ambio

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 520-526

  Mikusiński, Grzegorz ^a,b   Angelstam, Per ^b   Sporrong, Ulf ^c  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONIFEROUS FOREST; DECIDUOUS FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

CONIFEROPHYTA;

EID: 0346306176     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-32.8.520     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Angelstam, P. 1998. Maintaining and restoring biodiversity by developing natural disturbance regimes in European boreal forest. J. Veg. Sci. 9, 593-602.
2. Angelstam, P. 2002. Reconciling the linkages of land management with natural disturbance regimes to maintain forest biodiversity in Europe. In: Landscape Ecology and Resource Management: Linking Theory with Practice. Bissonette, J.A. and Storch, I. (eds). Island Press, Covelo CA and Washington, D.C., pp 193-226.
3. Niklasson, M. and Granström, A. 2000. Numbers and sizes of fires: long-term spatially explicit fire history in a Swedish boreal landscape. Ecology 81, 1484-1499.
4. Angelstam, P. 1997. Landscape analysis as a tool for the scientific management of biodiversity. Ecol. Bull. 46, 140-170.
5. Esseen, P-.A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L. and Sjöberg, K. 1997. Boreal forests. Ecol. Bull. 46, 16-47.
6. Engelmark, O. 1999. Boreal forest disturbances. In: Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. Walker, L.R. (ed.). Ecosystems of the World, 16. Elsevier, 900 pp.
7. Engelmark, O. and Hytteborn, H. 1999. Coniferous forests. Acta Phytogeogr. Suecica 84, 55-74.
8. Pitkänen, A. 1999. Paleoecological study of the history of forest fires in eastern Finland. Publ. Sci. 58, Univ. Joensuu, Finland.
9. Kuuluvainen, T. 1994. Gap disturbance, ground microtopography, and the regeneration dynamics of boreal coniferous forests in Finland, a review. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31, 35-51.
10. Sjöberg, K. and Ericson, L. 1997. Mosaic boreal landscapes with open and forested wetlands. Ecol. Bull. 46, 48-60.
11. Östlund, L. and Zackrisson, O. 2000. The forest history of boreal Sweden: a multi-disciplinary approach. In: Methods and Approaches in Forest History. Agnoletti, M. and Anderson, S. (eds). CABI Publishing, Wallingford. pp. 119-128.
12. Emanuelsson, M. and Segerström, U. 1998. Forest grazing and outland exploitation in the middle-ages in Dalarna, central Sweden. Lund Stud. Medevial Archeol. 20, 80-94.
13. Angelstam, P. 1996. Ghost of forest past - natural disturbance regimes as a basis for reconstruction of biologically diverse forests in Europe. In: Conservation of Faunal Diversity in Forested Landscapes. DeGraaf, R. and Miller, R.I. (eds). Chapman and Hall, pp. 287-337.
14. Linder, P. and Östlund, L. 1998. Structural changes in three mid-boreal Swedish forest landscapes, 1885-1996. Biol. Cons. 85, 9-19.
15. Eliasson, P. 2002. Forest, Power and People. Environmental History of Swedish Forest 1000-1875. Skogs-och lantbrukshistoriska meddelanden nr 25, KSLA, Stockholm. (In Swedish).
16. th century. Can. J. Forest Res. 27, 1198-1206.
17. Löfgren, R. (ed.). 1997. Forest Nature Reserves in Sweden. Rapport 4707. Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm. (In Swedish).
18. Nilsson, S.G. 1997. Forests in the temperate-boreal transition: natural and man-made features. Ecol. Bull. 46, 61-71.
19. Lindbladh, M. 1998. Long term dynamics and human influence in the forest landscape of Southern Sweden. Acta Univ. Agric. Sueciae, Silvestria 78. Alnarp, Sweden. (In Swedish).
20. Bergman, F. 1991. Birch and aspen in forest history perspective Skogsfakta 15, 4-15.
21. Nilsson, N.-E. (ed.). 1990. The Forest, National Atlas of Sweden. Stockholm, 144 pp.
22. Axelsson, A.-L, Östlund, L. and Hellberg, E. 2002. Changes in mixed deciduous forests of boreal Sweden 1866-1999 based on interpretation of historical records. Landscape Ecol. 17, 403-418.
23. Björse, G. and Bradshaw, R. 1998. 2000 years of forest dynamics in southern Sweden: suggestions for forest management. Forest Ecol. Mgmt 104, 15-26.
24. Lindbladh, M. and Bradshaw, R. 1998. The origin of present forest composition and pattern in southern Sweden. J. Biogeogr. 25, 463-477.
25. Anonymous 2002. Evaluation of Effects of Forest Policies. SUS 2001. National Board of Forestry, Jönköping. Meddelande 1 - 2002. (In Swedish).
26. Anonymous 2003. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2003. National Board of Forestry, Jönköping, Sweden.
27. Anonymous 2002. Forestry Statistics 2002. Official statistics of Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå. (In Swedish).
28. Angelstam, P., Wikberg, P-E., Danilov, P., Faber, W.E. and Nygrén, K. 2000. Effects of moose density on timber quality and biodiversity restoration in Sweden, Finland, and Russian Karelia. Alces 36, 133-145.
29. Kuusinen, M. 1994. Epiphytic lichen diversity on Salix caprea in old-growth southern and middle boreal forests of Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 31, 77-92.
30. Siitonen, J. and Martikainen, P 1994. Occurrence of rare and threatened insects living on decaying Populus tremula: A comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Scand. J. For. Res. 9, 185-191.
31. Angelstam, P., and Mikusiński, G. 1994. Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest - a review. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31, 157-172.
32. Enoksson, B., Angelstam, R and Larsson, K., 1995. Deciduous trees and resident birds - the problem of fragmentation within a coniferous forest landscape. Landscape Ecol. 10, 267-275.
33. Hedenås, H. and Ericson, L. 2000. Epiphytic macrolichens as conservation indicators: successional sequence in Populus tremula stands. Biol. Cons. 93, 43-53.
34. Berg, Å., Ehnström, B., Gustafsson, L. Hallingbäck, T., Jonsell, M. and Weslien, J. 1994. Threatened plant, animal and fungus species in Swedish forests - distribution and habitat associations. Conserv. Biol. 8, 718-731.
35. Nilsson, S. G. 2001. Value of deciduous trees and stands for biodiversity. Fauna Flora 96, 59-70. (In Swedish with English summary).
36. Gärdenfors, U. 2000. The 2000 Red List of Swedish Species. ArtDatabanken, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 393 pp. (In Swedish).
37. Gustafsson, L. 2002. Presence and abundance of red-listed plant species in Swedish forest. Conserv. Biol. 16, 377-388.
38. Anonymous 2000. Sweden's Environmental Objectives Interim Targets and Strategies. Regeringsproposition 2000/01:130. (In Swedish).
39. Almgren, G., 1990. Lövskog. Deciduous Forest. Birch, Aspen, and Alder in Forestry and Nature Conservation. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Sverige, 261 pp. (In Swedish).
40. Slotte, H. 2000. Harvest of leaf-hay in Sweden and Aland Island. Methods used and impact on landscape. Acta Univ. Agric. Sueciae - Agraria 236. Uppsala, Sweden, 248 pp. (In Swedish).
41. Mikusihski, G. and Angelstam, P. 1999. Man and deciduous trees in boreal landscape. In: Nature and Culture in Landscape Ecology. Experience for the 3rd Millenium. Kovar R (ed.). The Karolinum Press, Prague, pp. 220-224.
42. Helmfrid, S. (ed.). 1994. Landscapes and Settlements. National Atlas of Sweden. Stockholm.
43. Sjörs, H. 1965. Forest regions. Acta Phytogeogr. Suecica 50, 48-63.
44. Erixon, S. 1960. Swedish Villages without Systematic Settlement. A Comparative Historic Study. Nordiska museet, Stockholm. 266 pp. (In Swedish).
45. Sporrong, U. and Wennström, H.-F (eds). 1990. Maps and Mapping. National Atlas of Sweden. Stockholm, 205 pp.
46. Sporrong, U. 1996. Rural Landscape and Landscape Composition. Studier till kulturmiljöprogram i Sverige. Riksantikvarieämbetet. Stockholm. (In Swedish).
47. Anonymous 1992. Terrain Type Classification of Satellite Data Covering All of Sweden. Condensed final report. Swedish Space Corporation, Stockholm.
48. Anonymous 2002. Terrain Type Classification of Satellite Data Covering All of Sweden. Version 1. General Description and Evaluation. Lantmäteriet, Stockholm. (In Swedish).
49. Björklund, S. 1994. Use of GPS in Evaluation of Deciduous Forest Stands. Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, 47 pp. (In Swedish).
50. Fraser Hart, J. 1998. The Rural Landscape. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London. 401 pp.
51. Swedish National Land Survey 1998. General description of GSD - Blue Map. (http://www.lm. se/english/gsd/e_bla_98.pdf)
52. ESRI 2000. ArcView 3.2a. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Redlands, California, USA.
53. Rønningen, K. 1993. Sweden's agricultural policy reform and landscape management programme - preserve the best, forget about the rest? In: The Future of Rural Landscapes. Sporrong, U. (ed.) pp. 91-111. Bebyggelsehistorisk tidskrift 26.
54. Skånes, H. 1996. Landscape Change and Grassland Dynamics. Dissertation No. 8. Department of Physical Geography, Stockholms University Dissertation Series. Stockholm, Sweden.
55. Ihse, M. 1995. Swedish agricultural landscapes - patterns and changes during the last 50 years, studied by aerial photos. Landscape Urban Planning 33, 21-37.
56. Selander, S. 1955. The Living Landscape in Sweden Albert Bonniers Förlag, Stockholm, Sweden. (In Swedish).
57. Högbom, A.G. 1934. About Forest Fires in the Past and Present and Their Role in Forest Development Almqvists & Wiksells Boktryckeri AB, Uppsala och Stockholm, 101 pp. (In Swedish).
58. Sporrong, U 1994. Agrarian landscapes in Sweden that are of particular scientific interest. In: The Future of Rural Landscapes. Sporrong, U. (ed.). pp. 71-90 Bebyggelsehistorisk tidskrift 26.
59. Hall, O. 2003. Landscape from Space. Geographical Aspects on Scale, Regionalization and Change Detection. PhD thesis, Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University, Sweden.
60. Angelstam, P., Mikusiński, G., Eriksson, J.A., Jaxgård, P., Kellner, O., Koffman, A, Ranneby, B., Roberge, et al. 2003. Gap Analysis and Planning of Habitat Networks for the Maintenance of Boreal Forest Biodiversity in Sweden - a Technical Report from the RESE Case study in the Counties Dalama and Gävleborg. Department of Natural Sciences, Örebro University and Department of Conservation Biology, Forest Faculty, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
61. Angelstam, P., Bütler, R., Lazdinis, M., Mikusihski, G. and Roberge, J-M. Habitat thresholds at multiple scales and forest biodiversity conservation - focal species dependent on dead wood. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 41. In press.
62. Mikusiński, G. and Angelstam, P. 2001. Striking the balance between use and conservation in European landscapes. In: "Bioenergy from Sustainable Forestry: Principles and Practice". Richardson, J., Bjorheden, R., Hakkila, P., Lowe, A.T., Smith C.T. (eds). Proceedings of IEA Bioenergy Task 18 Workshop, 16-20 October 2000, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia. New Zealand Forest Research Institute, For. Res Bull. 223, pp. 59-70.
63. Angelstam, P., Breuss, M., Mikusiński, G., Stenström, M., Stighäll, K. and Thorell, D. 2002. Effects of forest structure on the presence of woodpeckers with different specialisation in a landscape history gradient in NE Poland. - In: Proc. 2002 Annual IALE(UK) held at the University of East Anglia, Chamberlain, D., Wilson, A. (eds). pp. 25-38.
64. Angelstam, P., Boresjö-Bronge, L., Mikusiński, G., Sporrong, U and Wästfelt, A. 2003. Assessing village authenticity with satellite images - a method to identify intact cultural landscapes in Europe. Ambio. 32, 594-604.
65. Swedish National Land Survey 2003. Swedish national map projections for RT 90 (http://www.lm.se/geodesi/refsys/rt/rt_projections.htm)
66. Gustafsson, L. and Ahlén, I. (eds). 1996. Geography of Plants and Animals. National Atlas of Sweden, Stockholm.
67. The Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research - MISTRA funded this study through the research program Remote Sensing for the Environment (RESE). We thank Margareta Ihse, Anders Larsson, Håkan Slotte and the referees for comments on the manuscript.