Epiphytic macrolichens as conservation indicators: Successional sequence in Populus tremula stands

Biological Conservation

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 43-53

  Hedenaås, Henrik ^a   Ericson, Lars ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cyanolichens; Dispersal strategies; Indicator species; Populus tremula; Stand age

Indexed keywords

BIOINDICATOR; CONSERVATION STATUS; EPIPHYTE; LICHEN; SUCCESSION;

SWEDEN;

POPULUS TREMULA;

EID: 0034008238     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00113-5     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ahti T., Hämet-Ahti L., Jalas J. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici. 5:1968;169-211.
2. Almgren, G., 1990. Lövskog. Björk, asp, och al i skogsbruk och naturvård. Skogsstyrelsen. Jönköping (in Swedish).
3. Andrén H. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos. 71:1994;355-366.
4. Andrén H. Habitat fragmentation and changes in biodiversity. Ecological Bulletins. 46:1997;171-181.
5. Aronsson, M., Hallingbäck, T., Mattsson, J.-E. (Eds.), 1995. Rödlistade växter i Sverige 1995 (Swedish Red Data Book of Plants 1995). Artdatabanken, Uppsala (in Swedish).
6. Baker W.L., Munroe J.A., Hessl A.E. The effects of elk on aspen in the winter range in Rocky Mountain National Park. Ecography. 20:1997;155-165.
7. Bailey R.H. Ecological aspects of dispersal and establishment in lichens. Brown D.H., Hawksworth D.L., Bailey R.H. Lichenology: Progress and Problems. 1976;279-307 Academic Press, London.
8. Bernes C. Biological Diversity in Sweden, A Country Study. 1994;Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Solna.
9. Bratt, L., Cederberg, B., Hermanson, J., Lundqvist, R., Nordin, A., Oldhammer, B., 1993. Särnaprojektet. Inventeringsrapport från en landskapsekologisk planering. Dala Natur, 10, Mora (in Swedish).
10. Dufrêne M., Legender P. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs. 67:1997;345-366.
11. Ebeling, F., 1978. Nordsvenska skogstyper. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbunds tidskrift, 76, 340-381 (in Swedish).
12. Esseen, P.-A., 1983. Ecology of lichens in boreal coniferous forest with reference to spatial and temporal patterns. Dissertation, Dept. of Ecological Botany, Umeå University.
13. Esseen P.-A., Ericson L., Lindström L., Zackrisson O. Occurrence and ecology of Usnea longissima in central Sweden. The Lichenologist. 13:1981;177-190.
14. Esseen P.-A., Ehnström B., Ericson L., Sjöberg K. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins. 46:1997;16-47.
15. Gauslaa Y. Lobaria pulmonaria, an indicator of species-rich forests of long ecological continuity. Blyttia. 52:1994;119-128. (in Norwegian, English summary).
16. Hallingbäck T. The Lichens of Sweden and their Ecology. 1995;ArtDatabanken, Uppsala. (in Swedish, English summary).
17. Hestmark, G., 1991. To sex, or not to sex. Structures and strategies of reproduction in the family Umbilicariaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycetes). Sommerfeltia (Suppl.), 3, 1-47.
18. Holien H. Influence of site and stand factors on the distribution of crustose lichens of the Caliciales in a suboceanic spruce forest area in central Norway. The Lichenologist. 28:1996;315-330.
19. Hägglund, B., Lundmark, J.-E., 1977. Skattning av höjdboniteten med ståndortsfaktorer. Tall och gran i Sverige. Departments of Forest Ecology and Forest Soils, Royal College of Forestry, Research Notes, 28, 1-240 (in Swedish).
20. Jongman R.H.G., ter Braak C.J.F., van Tongeren O.F.R. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. 1995;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Karström M. The project one step ahead - a presentation. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 86:1992;103-114. (in Swedish, English summary).
22. Karström M. Habitats and rare species in virgin forests of northernmost Sweden. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 86:1992;115-146. (in Swedish, English summary).
23. Karström, M., 1993. Indikatorarter som biologisk inventeringsmetod. In: Olsson, G.A., Granberg, M. (Eds.), Indikatorarter för Identifiering av Naturskogar i Norrbotten. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Rep. 4276. Solna, pp. 19-96 Solna. (in Swedish).
24. Kotiranta, H., Niemelä, T., 1993. Threatened polypores in Finland. Vatten- och miljöförvaltningen. publ. B17, Helsinki (in Finnish, English summary).
25. Kurkela T. Epiphytology of Melampsora rusts on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and aspen (Populus tremula L.). Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae. 79(4):1973;1-68.
26. Kuusinen M. Epiphytic lichen diversity on Salix caprea in old-growth southern and middle boreal forests Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici. 31:1994;77-92.
27. Kuusinen M. Epiphytic lichen flora and diversity on Populus tremula in old-growth and managed forests of southern and middle boreal Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici. 31:1994;245-260.
28. Kuusinen M. Cyanobacterial macrolichens on Populus tremula as indicators of forest continuity in Finland. Biological Conservation. 75:1996;43-49.
29. Lid, J., Lid, D.T., Norsk Flora. 6th ed. Det Norske Samlaget, Oslo.
30. McCune B. Gradients in epiphyte biomass in three Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forests of different ages in Western Oregon and Washington. The Bryologist. 96:1993;405-411.
31. Nilsson S.G., Arup U., Baranowski R., Ekman S. Tree-dependent lichens and beetles as indicators in conservation forests. Conservation Biology. 9:1995;1208-1215.
32. Nilsson S.G., Ericson L. Conservation of plant and animal populations in theory and practice. Ecological Bulletins. 46:1997;117-139.
33. Nitare J., Norén M. Woodland key-habitats of rare and endangered species will be mapped in a new project of the Swedish National Board of Forestry. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 86:1992;219-226. (in Swedish, English summary).
34. Økland B. Unlogged forests: important sites for preserving the diversity of mycetophilids (Diptera: Sciaroidea). Biological Conservation. 76:1996;297-310.
35. Økland B., Bakke A., Hågvar S., Kvamme T. What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles.? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodiversity and Conservation. 5:1996;75-100.
36. Peterken G.F. A method for assessing woodland flora for conservation using indicator species. Biological Conservation. 6:1974;239-245.
37. Peterken G.F., Game M. Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant species in the woodlands of central Lincolnshire. Journal of Ecology. 72:1984;155-182.
38. Rose F. Lichenological indicators of age and environmental continuity in woodlands. Brown D.H., Hawksworth D.L., Bailey R.H. Lichenology: Progress and Problems. 1976;279-307 Academic Press, London.
39. Santesson R. The Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi of Sweden and Norway. 1993;SBT-förlaget, Lund.
40. Sillett S.C., Neitlich P.N. Emerging themes in epiphyte research in Westside forests with special reference to cyanolichens. Northwest Science. 70:1996;54-60.
41. Skogsstyrelsen, 1994. Signalartsförteckning. Skogsstyrelsen. Jönköping (in Swedish).
42. Tibell L. Crustose lichens as indicators of forest continuity in boreal forests. Nordic Journal of Botany. 12:1992;427-450.
43. ter Braak C.J.F. CANOCO Version 3.10. 1990;-Agricultural Mathematics Group DLO, Wageningen.
44. Tonteri T. Species richness of boreal understorey forest vegetation in relation to site type and successional factors. Annales Zoologici Fennici. 31:1994;53-60.
45. van der Maarel E. Vegetation dynamics: patterns in time and space. Vegetatio. 77:1988;7-19.
46. van Ruremonde R.H.A.C., Kalkhoven J.T.R. Effects of woodlot isolation on the dispersion of plants with fleshy fruits. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2:1991;377-384.
47. Whittaker R.H. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Reviews. 49:1967;207-264.
48. Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1984;Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.