Monocular and binocular depth discrimination thresholds

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 76, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 770-782

  Kaye, Stephen B ^a,b   Siddiqui, Akmal ^a   Ward, Angela ^a   Noonan, Carmel ^a   Fisher, Anthony C ^b   Green, John R ^c   Brown, Malcolm C ^b   Wareing, Paul A ^b   Watt, Peter ^b  

^a ALDER HEY CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Binocular; Depth thresholds; Monocular

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; PATIENT REHABILITATION; STEREO VISION;

MONOCULAR/BINOCULAR DEPTH DISCRIMINATION THRESHOLDS; VARIABLE DISTANCE STEREOACUITY (VDS) TESTS;

BINOCULAR VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CALCULATION; CHILD; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONOCULAR VISION; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRABISMUS; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ANISOMETROPIA; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ESOTROPIA; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; STRABISMUS; VISION TESTS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0033230973     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199911000-00026     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Brown JP, Ogle KN, Reiher L. Stereoscopic acuity and observation distance. Invest Ophthalmol 1965;4:894-900.
2. Amigo G. Variation in stereoscopic acuity with observation distance. J Optom Soc Am 1963;53:630-5.
3. Zanoni D, Rosenbaum AL. A new method for evaluating distance stereo acuity. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1991;28:255-60.
4. Stathacopoulos RA, Rosenbaum AL, Zanoni D, Stager DR, McCall LC, Ziffer AJ, Everett M. Distance stereoacuity. Assessing control in intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology (Rochester) 1993;100: 495-500.
5. O'Neal TD, Rosenbaum AL, Stathacopoulos RA. Distance stereo acuity improvement in intermittent exotropic patients following strabismus surgery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1995;32:353-7.
6. James GTB. Measurement of stereoscopic visual acuity. Lancet 1908; 1:1763-6.
7. Howard HJ. A test for the judgement of distance. Am J Ophthalmol 1919;2:656-75.
8. Howard IP, Rogers BJ. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995:2.
9. Birch EE. Binocular vision. In: Simons K, ed. Early Visual Development, Normal and Abnormal. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993:197.
10. Shimojo S. Development of interocular vision in infants. In: Simons K, ed. Early Visual Development, Normal and Abnormal. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993:201-21.
11. Shimojo S, Silverman GH, Nakayama K. An occlusion-related mechanism of depth perception based on motion and interocular sequence. Nature 1988;333:265-8.
12. Shimojo S, Nakayama K. Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry. Vision Res 1990;30:69-80.
13. Tyler C. On the development of the threshold nonlinearity, peripheral acuity, binocularity, and complex stereoscopic processing. In: Simons K, ed. Early Visual Development, Normal and Abnormal. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993:258-83.
14. Richards W. Stereopsis with and without monocular contours. Vision Res 1977;17:967-9.
15. Saye A. Facilitation of stereopsis from a large disparity random-dot stereogram by various monocular features: further findings (a short note). Perception 1976;5:461-5.
16. Frisby JP, Mein J, Saye A, Stanworth A. Use of random-dot sterograms in the clinical assessment of strabismic patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1975;59:545-52.
17. Rogers B, Graham M. Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception 1979;8:125-34.
18. Heuer H. Apparent motion in depth resulting from changing size and changing vergence. Perception 1987;16:337-50.
19. Rogers BJ, Collett TS. The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. Q J Exp Psychol (A) 1989;41: 697-717.
20. Sloan L, Altman A. Factors involved in several tests of binocular depth perception. Arch Ophthalmol 1954;52:524-44.
21. Cooper J, Feldman J. Assessing the Frisby Stereo Test under monocular viewing conditions. J Am Optom Assoc 1979;50:807-9.
22. Simons K. A comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot circles stereotests in screening and office use. Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:446-52.
23. Howard IP, Rogers BJ. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995:151.
24. Bishop PO. Binocular vision. Clinical application. In: Adler FH, Moses RA, Hart WM, eds. Adler's Physiology of the Eye. 8th ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1987:619-89.
25. Deyo BV. Monocular and binocular judgement of distance. Am J Ophthalmol 1922;5:343-7.
26. Pierce DM, Benton AL. Relationship between monocular and binocular depth acuity. Ophthalmologica 1975;170:43-50.
27. Kaye SB, Siddiqui A, Ward A, Noonan C, Fisher T, Brown M. A variable distance stereoacuity test (ARVO Abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:S110.
28. Brooks SE, Johnson D, Fischer N. Anisometropia and binocularity. Ophthalmology (Rochester) 1996;103:1139-43.
29. Worth CA. Squint: Its Causes, Pathology and Treatment. London, England: Bailliere, Tindall & Cox, 1903:14-6.
30. Kaye SB, O'Donnell N, Holden R. Recording sensory and motor aspects of strabismus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1997;34: 188-90.
31. Hinchliffe HA. Clinical evaluation of stereopsis. Br Orthoptic J 1978;35:46-57.
32. Walraven J. Amblyopia screening with random-dot stereograms. Am J Ophthalmol 1975;80:893-900.
33. Simons K, Elhatton K. Artifacts in fusion and stereopsis testing based on red/green dichoptic image separation. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1994;31:290-7.
34. Harris WF. Statistical inference on mean dioptric power: hypothesis testing and confidence regions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1990;10: 363-72.
35. Kendall MG. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. 4th ed. London: C. Griffin, 1948:390.
36. Marsh WR, Rawlings SC, Mumma JV. Evaluation of clinical stereoacuity tests. Ophthalmology (Rochester) 1980;87:1265-72.
37. Hall C. The relationship between clinical stereotests. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1982;2:135-43.
38. Goodwin RT, Romano PE. Stereoacuity degradation by experimental and real monocular and binocular amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:917-23.
39. Simons K, Reinecke RD. A reconsideration of amblyopia screening and stereopsis. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;78:707-13.
40. Reinecke RD, Simons K. A new stereoscopic test for amblyopia screening. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;78:714-21.
41. Gogel WC. Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance. Am J Psychol 1972;85:477-97.
42. Mershon DH, Jones TA, Taylor ME. Organizational factors and the perception of motion in depth. Percept Psychophys 1993;54:240-9.
43. Ogle KN. Relative sizes of the ocular images of the two eyes in asymmetrical convergence. Arch Ophthalmol 1939;22:1046-67.
44. Foley JM, Richards W. Effects of voluntary eye movement and convergence on the binocular appreciation of depth. Percept Psychophys 1972;11:423-7.
45. Bishop PO. Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: a new interpretation. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol) 1989; 237:445-69.
46. Ogle KN. Researches in Binocular Vision. New York: Hafner Publishing Company, 1964:140.
47. Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature 1993;361:253-5.
48. Cumming BG, Johnston EB, Parker AJ. Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape. Nature 1991;349:411-3.
49. Richards W, Miller JF Jr. Convergence as a cue to depth. Percept Psychophys 1969;5:317-20.
50. Leibowitz H, Moore D. Role of changes in accommodation and convergence in the perception of size. J Opt Soc Am 1966;56: 1120-3.
51. Wallach H, Floor L. The use of size matching to demonstrate the effectiveness of accommodation and convergence as cues for distance. Percept Psychophys 1971;10:423-8.
52. Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ. Accommodation and apparent distance. Perception 1988;17:609-21.
53. Brzezinski MA. Review: astigmatic accommodation (sectional accommodation) - a form of dynamic astigmatism. Aust J Optom 1982;65:5-11.
54. Beck J. Accommodative astigmatism and patten acuity. J Opt Soc Am 1965;55:1139-42.
55. Howard IP, Rogers BJ. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995:315.
56. Charman WN, Jennings JA. Recognition of TNO stereotest figures in the absence of true stereopsis. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:535-6.
57. Cooper J, Warshowsky J. Lateral displacement as a response cue in the Titmus Stereo test. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977;54:537-41.
58. Cooper J, Feldman J, Medlin D. Comparing stereoscopic performance of children using the Titmus, TNO, and Randot stereo tests. J Am Optom Assoc 1979;50:821-5.
59. Cornforth LL, Johnson BL, Kohl P, Roth N. Chromatic imbalance due to commonly used red-green filters reduces accuracy of stereoscopic depth perception. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:842-5.
60. Cooper J, Feldman J. Random-dot-stereogram performance by strabismic, amblyopic, and ocular-pathology patients in an operant-discrimination task. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978;55:599-609.
61. Fleck R, Kolling GH. Two new stereotests for long distance: examination of stereopsis with regard to the permission of driving. Ger J Ophthalmol 1996;5:53-9.
62. Donzis PB, Rappazzo JA, Burde RM, Gordon M. Effect of binocular variations of Snellen's visual acuity on Titmus stereoacuity. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:930-2.