Depth perception in random dot stereograms is not affected by changes in either vergence or accommodation

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 75, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 743-747

  Gonzalez, Francisco ^a   Rivadulla, Casto ^b   Perez, Rogelio ^a   Cadarso, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Depth perception; Random dot stereograms; Retinal disparity; Stereopsis

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; OPHTHALMOLOGY; STATISTICAL METHODS; STEREO VISION;

EXTRARETINAL CUES; FIXATION DISTANCE; RANDOM DOT STEREOGRAMS; RETINAL DISPARITY; STEREOPSIS; VERGENCE ANGLE;

DEPTH PERCEPTION;

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STEREORADIOGRAPHY; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0032191580     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199810000-00019     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Julesz B. Binocular depth perception of computer generated patterns. Bell Syst Tech J 1960;39:1125-62.
2. Poggio GF, Fischer B. Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 1977;40:1392-405.
3. Poggio GF, Gonzalez F, Krause F. Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity. J Neurosci 1988;8:4531-50.
4. Gonzalez F, Krause F, Perez R, Alonso JM, Acuna C. Binocular matching in monkey visual cortex: single cell responses to correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random dot stereograms. Neuroscience 1993;52:933-9.
5. Bishop PO. Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: a new interpretation. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol) 1989;237:445-69.
6. Mayhew J. The interpretation of stereo-disparity information: the computation of surface orientation and depth. Perception 1982;11:387-403.
7. Mayhew JE, Longuet-Higgins HC. A computational model of binocular depth perception. Nature 1982;297:376-8.
8. Gumming BG, Johnston EB, Parker AJ. Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape. Nature 1991;349:411-3.
9. Trotter Y, Celebrini S, Stricanne B, Thorpe S, Imbert M. Modulation of neural stereoscopic processing in primate area V1 by the viewing distance. Science 1992;257:1279-81.
10. Trotter Y, Celebrini S, Stricanne B, Thorpe S, Imbert M. Neural processing of stereopsis as a function of viewing distance in primate visual cortical area V1. J Neurophysiol 1996;76:2872-85.
11. Krommenhoek KP, Van Gisbergen JA. Evidence for nonretinal feedback in combined version-vergence eye movements. Exp Brain Res 1994;102:95-109.
12. Weyand TG, Malpeli JG. Responses of neurons in primary visual cortex are modulated by eye position. J Neurophysiol 1993;69:2258-60.
13. Steinbach MJ. Proprioceptive knowledge of eye position. Vision Res 1987;27:1737-44.
14. Graves AL, Trotter Y, Fregnac Y. Role of extraocular muscle proprioception in the development of depth perception in cats. J Neurophysiol 1987;58:816-31.
15. Gauthier GM, Nommay D, Vercher JL. The role of ocular muscle proprioception in visual localization of targets. Science 1990;249:58-61.
16. Wallach H, Frey KJ, Bode KA. The nature of adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues. Percept Psychophys 1972;11:110-6.
17. Wallach H, Floor L. The use of size matching to demonstrate the effectiveness of accommodation and convergence as cues for distance. Percept Psychophys 1971;10:423-8.
18. Frisby JP. Seeing: Illusion, Brain and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979:144-5.
19. Collewijn H, Erkelens CJ, Regan D. Absolute and relative disparity: a re-evaluation of their significance in perception and oculomotor control. In: Keller EL, Zee DS, eds. Adaptative Processes in Visual and Oculomotor Systems: Proceedings of a Conference in Asolimar [sic], California, June 16-20, 1985. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1986:177-84.
20. Gonzalez F, Relova JL, Perez R, Acuna C, Alonso JM. Cell responses to vertical and horizontal retinal disparities in the monkey visual cortex. Neurosci Lett 1993;160:167-70.
21. Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature 1993;361:253-5.
22. Ogle KN. Induced size effect: I. A new phenomenon in binocular space perception associated with the relative sizes of the images in the two eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1938;20:604-23.