The role of prosody in semantic interpretation

Music Perception

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 79-97

  Pynte, Joel ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345757909     PISSN: 07307829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/40285779     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Beckman, M. E. (1996). The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 17-67.
2. Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and its uses. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
3. Britt, M. A. (1994). The interaction of referential ambiguity and argument structure in the parsing of prepositional phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 251-283.
4. Brown, G. (1983). Prosodic structure and the given/new distinction. In A. Cutler & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements. Berlin : Springer-Verlag (pp. 67-77).
5. Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Clark, H., & Haviland, S. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Crain, S., & Steedman, M. (1985). On not being led up the garden-path: The use of context by the psychological syntax processor. In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40, 141-201.
9. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14(1), 113-121.
10. de Cornuiler, B. (1979). Problèmes de métrique française. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France.
11. de Cornuiler, B. (1982). Théorie du vers, Rimbaud, Verlaine, Mallarmé. Paris: Seuil.
12. Di Cristo, A., & Hirst, D. (1986).Modelling French micro-melody: Analysis and synthesis. Phonetica, 43, 11-30.
13. Eaddy, S. J., & Cooper, W. E. (1986). Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 402-415.
14. Edwards, J. R., Beckman, M. E., Fletcher, J. (1991). The articulatory chinematics of final lengthening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 369-382.
15. Gee, J. P., & Grosjean, F. (1983). Performance structures: Psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 411-458.
16. Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
17. Haviland, S., & Clark, H. (1974) What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 233-255.
18. Hirst, D. (1993). Detaching intonational phrases from syntactic structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(4), 782-788.
19. Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Leiva, L. (1992). Role de la prosodie dans l'analyse syntaxique. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, Psychology Department, University of Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France.
21. Liberman, M. (1975). On the intonation system of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistic Club, Bloomington, IN.
22. Marcus, M., & Hindle, D. (1990). Description theory and intonation boundaries. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., & Lee, C. S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 73-87.
24. Mitchell, D. C., Corley, M. M. B., & Garnham, A. (1992). Effects of context in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a discourse-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 69-88.
25. Monnin, P., &Grosjean, F. (1993). Les structures de performance en français: Caractérisation et prédiction. L'Année Psychologique, 93, 9-30.
26. Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986) Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
27. Nooteboom, S. G., & Kruyt, J. G. (1987). Accents, focus distribution, and the perceived distribution of given and new information: an experiment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82(5), 1512-1524.
28. Pasdeloup, V. (1989), Description du système accentuel et intonatif du français. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France.
29. Perfetti, C. A. (1990). The cooperative language processor: Semantic influences in an autonomous syntax. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.)., Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Perrier, P., Ostry, D. J., & Laboissière, R. (1996). The equilibrium point hypothesis and its application to speech motor control. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(2), 365-377.
31. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
32. Pynte, J. (1998). The time-course of attachment decisions: Evidence from French. In D. Hillert (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: A crosslinguistic perspective (vol. 31, pp. 227-245). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33. Pynte, J., & Prieur, B. (1996). Prosodic breaks and attachment decisions in sentence parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 165-191.
34. Pynte, J., & Prieur, B. (forthcoming). Interaction of prosody and verbs' argument structure in speech comprehension.
35. Rietveld, A. C. M. (1980). Word boundaries in the French language. Language and Speech, 23, 289-296.
36. Schwartze, C. (1988). The treatment of French adjectif detaché in Lexical Functional Grammar. In U. Reyle & C. Rohrer (Eds.), Natural language parsing and linguistic theories (pp. 262-288). Boston, MA: Reidel.
37. Seidenberg, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1977). Psychological constraints on grammars: On trying to put the real back in "psychological reality." In W. A. Beach, S. E. Fox, & S. Philosoph (Eds.), CLS 13. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
38. Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Steedman, M. (1991). Structure and intonation. Language, 67, 260-296.
40. Vaissière, J. (1974). On French prosody. Quarterly Progress Report, M.I.T., 114, 212-223.
41. Vaissière, J. (1975). Further note on French prosody. Quarterly Progress Report, M.I.T., 115, 251-262.
42. Warren, P. (1985). The temporal organisation and perception of speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, England.
43. Watt, S., & Murray, W. S. (1996). Prosodic form and parsing commitments. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 291-318.
44. Watt, S. M., & Murray, W. S. (1994, May 13-14). Prosody and the parsing of complements: a cross-modal study. Paper presented at the Fourth Workshop on Language Comprehension, Giens, France.