Statistical significance and replicability of the data;Significación estadística, importancia del efecto y replicabilidad de los datos

Psicothema

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2000, Pages 408-412

  Pascual Llobell, Juan ^a   García Pérez, José Fernando ^a   Frías Navarro, María Dolores ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345752772     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.
2. Chow, S. L. (1996). Statistical significance, rationale, validity and utility. London: Sage.
3. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (ed. rev.). New York: Academic Press.
4. Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
5. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
6. Fisher, R. A (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver & Boyd.
7. Frick, R. (1995). On accepting the null hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 23, 132-138.
8. Frick, R. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1, 379-390.
9. Gigerenzer, G. (1993). The superego, the ego, and the id in statistical reasoning. En G. Kereng y C. Lewis (eds.), A handbook of data analysis in behavioral sciences: methodological issues (pp. 311-339). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Greenwald, A. G., González, R., Harris, R. J., y Guthrie, D. (1996). Effect sizes and p values: what should be reported and what should be replicated? Psychophysiology, 33, 175-183.
11. Hagen, R. L. (1997) In praise of the null hypothesis statistical test, American Psychologist, 52, 15-24.
12. Hammond, G. (1996). The objections to null hypothesis testing as a means of analyzing psychological data. Australian Journal of Psychology, 2, 104-106.
13. Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., y Steiger, J. H. (1997). What if there were non significance tests? London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Hayes, W. L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists. New York, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15. Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151-159.
16. Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and phisics: A methodological paradox, Philosophy of Science, 34, 103-115.
17. Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195-244.
18. Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: a commentary for social and behavioral sciences. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
20. Thompson, B. (1966). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25, 26-30.