Proper and Improper Multiple Imputation

International Statistical Review

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 593-607

  Nielsen, Søren Feodor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Congeniality; Efficiency; Missing data; Multiple imputation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345659236     PISSN: 03067734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2003.tb00214.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. David, M., Little, R.J.A., Samuhel, M.E. & Triest, R.K. (1986). Alternative Methods for CPS Income Imputation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 29-41.
2. Ezzati-Riee, T.M., Khare, M. & Schafer, J.L. (1993). Multiple Imputation of Missing Data in NHANESIII. Paper presented at the American Statistical Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco.
3. Fay, R. (1996), Alternative Paradigms for the Analysis of Imputed Survey Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 490-498.
4. Gelman, A. & Rubin, D.B. (1992). Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences. Statistical Science (with discussion), 7, 457-472.
5. Glynn, R., Laird, N. & Rubin, D.B. (1993). The Performance of Mixture Models for Nonignorable Nonresponse with Follow Ups. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 984-993.
6. Imbens, G., Ridder, G., Hirano, K. & Rubin, D.B. (2001). Combining Panel Data Sets with Attrition and Refreshment Samples. Econometrica, 69(6), 1645-1659.
7. Kott, P.S. (1992). A Note on a Counter Example to Variance Estimation Using Multiple Imputation. Technical Report. Agricultural Statistical Service, Washington, D.C.
8. Meng, X.L. (2001). A Congenial Overview and Investigation of Multiple Imputation Inferences under Uncongeniality. In Survey Nonresponse, Eds. R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge and R.J.A. Little, pp. 343-356. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
9. Meng, X.L. & Romero, M. (2003). Discussion to Nielsen, S.F.: Proper and Improper Multiple Imputation. International Statistical Review, 71, 607-618.
10. Meng, X.L. & Schilling, S. (2002). Warp Bridge Sampling. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 11, 552-586.
11. Neyman, J. (1934). On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: The Method of Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 97, 558-606.
12. Nielsen, S.F. (1997). Inference and Missing Data: Asymptotic Results. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 24, 261-274.
13. Nielsen, S.F. (2000). Relative Coarsening at Random. Statistica Neerlandica, 54, #1, 79-99.
14. Nielsen, S.F. (2003). Proper and Improper Multiple Imputation. International Statistical Review, 71, 593-607.
15. Raghunathan, T.E. & Rubin, D.B. (1998). Roles for Bayesian Techniques in Survey Sampling. Proceedings of the Silver Jubilee meeting of the Statistical Society of Canada, pp. 51-55.
16. Rao, J.N.K., Jocelyn, W. & Hidiroglou, M.A. (2003). Confidence Coverage Properties for Regression Estimators in Uni-Phase and Two-Phase Sampling. Journal of Official Statistics, 19, 17-30.
17. Rubin, D.B., (1976). Inference and Missing Data. Biometrika, 63, 581-592.
18. Rubin, D.B., (2003). Nested Multiple Imputation of NMES via Partially Incompatible MCMC. Statistica Neerlandica, 57(1), 1-16.
19. Rubin, D.B., Stern, H.S. & Vehovar, V. (1995). Handling 'Don't Know' Survey Responses: The Case of the Slovenian Plebiscite, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 822-828.
20. Shen, Zijin (2000). Nested Multiple Imputation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Doctoral dissertation.
21. Tu, X.M., Meng, X.L. & Pagano, M. (1993). The AIDs Epidemic: Estimating Survival After AIDs Diagnosis From Surveillance Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 26-36.
22. Zaslavsky, A. (1994). Comment on Meng, X.L., 'Multiple-Imputation Inferences with Uncongenial Sources of Input.' Statistical Science, 9, 563-566.
23. Zhang, P. (2003). Multiple Imputation: Theory and Method. International Statistical Review, 71, 581-592.