Alternative Paradigms for the Analysis of Imputed Survey Data

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 91, Issue 434, 1996, Pages 490-498

  Fay, Robert E ^a  

^a U S CENSUS BUREAU   (United States)

Author keywords

Fractionally weighted imputation; Missing data; Multiple imputation; Rao Shao variance estimator

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030557655     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476909     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Clogg, C. C., Rubin, D. B., Schenker, N., Schultz, B., and Weidman, L. (1991), –Multiple Imputation of Industry and Occupation Codes in Census Public-Use Samples Using Bayesian Logistic Regression,— Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 68-78.
2. Fay, R. E. (1991), –A Design-Based Perspective on Missing Data Variance,— in Proceedings of the 1991 Annual Research Conference, u. s. Bureau of the Census, pp. 429-440.
3. Fay, R. E. (1992), –When Are Inferences From Multiple Imputation Valid?— in Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 227-232.
4. Fay, R. E. (1993), –Valid Inferences From Imputed Survey Data,— in Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 227-232.
5. Fay, R. E. (1994), –Analyzing Imputed Survey Data Sets With ModelAssisted Estimators,— in Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 900-905.
6. Fay, R. E. (1995), –Alternative Paradigms for the Analysis of Imputed Survey Data, Extended Version,— unpublished report, U. S. Census Bureau.
7. Ford, B. (1983), –An Overview of Hot-Deck Procedures,— in Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, Vol. 2, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council, eds. W. G. Madow, H. Nisselson, and I. Olkin, New York: Academic Press, pp. 185-207.
8. Heitjan, D. E, and Landis, J. R. (1994), –Assessing Secular Trends in Blood Pressure: A Multiple-Imputation Approach,— Journal of the AmericanStatistical Association, 89, 75G-759.
9. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983), Mental Models, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Kalton, G., and Kish, L. (1981), –Two Efficient Random Imputation Procedures,— in Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 146-151.
11. Krewski, D., and Rao, J. N. K. (1981), –Inference From Stratified Samples: Properties of the Linearization, Jackknife, and Balanced Repeated Replication Methods,— The Annals ofStatistics, 9, 101G-1019.
12. Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Little, R. J. A., and Rubin, D. B. (1987), Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, New York: John Wiley.
14. Madow, W. G., Nisselson, H., and OIkin, I. (Eds.) (1983), Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, Vol. 1, Report, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council, New York: Academic Press.
15. Meng, X.-L. (1994), –Multiple-Imputation Inferences With Uncongenial Sources of Input— (with discussion), Statistical Science, 9, 538-573.
16. National Academy of Sciences (1989), On Being a Scientist, Committee on the Conduct of Science, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. Newell, A. (1990), Unified Theories of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972), Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Rao, J. N. K., and Shao, J. (1992), –Jackknife Variance Estimation With Survey Data Under Hot-Deck Imputation,— Biometrika, 79, 811-822.
20. Rubin, D. B. (1978), "Multiple Imputations in Sample Surveys: A Phenomenological Bayesian Approach to Nonresponse, ' in Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 2G-34.
21. Rubin, D. B. (1987), Multiple Imputationfor Nonresponse in Surveys, New York: John Wiley.
22. Rubin, D. B., and Schenker, N. (1986), "Multiple Imputations for Interval Estimation From Simple Random Samples With Ignorable Nonresponse, ' Journal ofthe American Statistical Association, 81, 366-374.
23. Siirndal, C. E. (1992), –Methods for Estimating the Precision of Survey Estimates When Imputation Has Been Used,— Survey Methodology, 18, 241-252.
24. Stigler, S. (1994), –President's Report 1993-1994,— The IMS Bulletin, 23, 537-541.