The Gender Congruency Effect and the Selection of Freestanding and Bound Morphemes: Evidence from Croatian

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1270-1282

  Costa, Albert ^a,b   Kovacic, Damir ^b   Fedorenko, Evelina ^c   Caramazza, Alfonso ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b SISSA   (Italy)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SEX FACTORS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0345581731     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1270     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alario, F. X., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of determiners: Evidence from French. Cognition, 82, 179-223.
2. Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Bock, J. K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45-93.
5. Bock, K., Nicol, J., & Cutting, J. C. (1999). The ties that bind: Creating number agreement in speech. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 330-346.
6. Caramazza, A., & Costa, A. (2000). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Does the response set matter? Cognition, 75, B51-B64.
7. Caramazza, A., & Costa, A. (2001). Set size and repetition in the picture-word interference paradigm: Implications for models of naming. Cognition, 80, 291-298.
8. Caramazza, A., Miozzo, M., Costa, A., Schiller, N., & Alario, F. X. (2001). A crosslinguistic investigation of determiner production. In Dupoux, E. (Ed.), Language, brain, and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 209-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
10. Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
11. Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of noun phrases in English and Spanish: Implications for the scope of phonological encoding in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 178-198
12. Costa, A., Mahon, B., Savova, V., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Level of categorization effect: A novel effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 205-233.
13. Costa, A., Sebastian-Galles, N., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The gender-congruity effect: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 381-391.
14. Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654.
15. Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
16. Haskell, T. R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Conflicting cues and competition in subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 760-778.
17. Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843.
18. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1999). In search of gender recency: Evidence from the production of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 28, 739-745
19. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H., & Ansgar, H. H. (2001). Semantic and phonological activation in noun and pronoun production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1058-1078.
20. La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16, 400-410.
21. La Heij, W., Mark, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E. (1998). The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209-219.
22. La Heij, W., Van der Heijden, A. H., & Schreuder, R. (1985). Semantic priming and Stroop-like interference in word-naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 62-80.
23. Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of responses competition in the Picture-Word Interference Task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485-495.
24. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
25. Meyer, A. S., & Bock, K. (1999). Representations and processes in the production of pronouns: Some perspectives from Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 281-301.
26. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 907-922.
27. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228-252.
28. Miozzo, M., Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The absence of a gender congruency effect in Romance languages: A matter of SOA? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 388-391.
29. Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
30. Roelofs, A. (2001). Set size and repetition matter: Comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000). Cognition, 80, 283-290.
31. Scalise, S. (1994). Morfologia [Editorial], Il Mulino.
32. Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Gender interference in speech production: The case of German. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 45.
33. Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 169-194
34. Schriefers, H. (1992). Lexical access in the production of noun phrases. Cognition, 45, 33-54.
35. Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841-850.
36. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
37. Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (2000). Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: The gender interference effect in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1368-1377.
38. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686-698.
39. Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 93.
40. Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 740-759.
41. Van Berkum, J. J. A. (1997). Syntactic processes in speech production: The retrieval of grammatical gender. Cognition, 64, 115-152.
42. Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 186-215.
43. Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (1999). When sex and syntax go hand in hand: Gender agreement in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 455-478.
44. Vitkovitch, M., & Tyrrell, L. (1999). The effects of distractor words on naming pictures at the subordinate level. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 905-926.