Syntactic processes in speech production: The retrieval of grammatical gender

Cognition

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 115-152

  Van Berkum, Jos J A ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anaphoric reference; Grammatical gender agreement; Lexical memory; Picture word interference; Speech production

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SEMANTICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SEX FACTORS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0031196632     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00026-7     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson, J.R., 1993. Rules of the Mind. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Badecker, W., Miozzo, M., Zanuttini, R., 1995. The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition 57, 193-216.
3. Berg, T., 1992. Prelexical and postlexical features in language production. Applied Psycholinguistics 13, 199-235.
4. van Berkum, J.J.A., 1996. The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender: studies in language comprehension and production. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
5. Bickerton, D., 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (2), 173-221.
6. Bock, J.K., 1995. Sentence production: from mind to mouth. In: Miller, J.L., Eimas, P.D. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 11. Speech, language, and communication. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 181-216.
7. Bock, J.K., Eberhard, K.M., 1993. Meaning, sound, and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 57-99.
8. Bock, J.K., Miller, C.A., 1991. Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology 23, 45-93.
9. Burnage, G., 1990. CELEX: a guide for users. Centre for lexical information, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
10. Corbett, G.G., 1991. Gender. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Corbett, G.G., 1994. Gender and gender systems. In: Asher, R.E., Simpson, J.M.Y. (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, Vol. 3, pp. 1347-1353.
12. Dell, G.S., 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93 (3), 283-321.
13. Dell, G.S., 1990. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes 5 (4), 313-349.
14. Fodor, J.A., 1983. The Modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Frick, R.W., 1995. Accepting the null hypothesis. Memory and Cognition 23 (1), 132-138.
16. Henaff Gonon, M.A., Bruckert, R., Michel, F., 1989. Lexicalization in an anomic patient. Neuropsychologia 27 (4), 391-407.
17. Jescheniak, J.-D., 1994. Word frequency effects in speech production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
18. Jescheniak, J.-D. 1996. The production of gender-marked pronouns: a study of primed object naming. Manuscript submitted for publication. Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
19. Jescheniak, J.-D., Levelt, W.J.M., 1994. Word frequency effects in speech production: retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition 20 (4), 824-843.
20. Kempen, G., Huijbers, P., 1983. The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: indirect election of words. Cognition 14, 185-209.
21. Kirsner, K., Speelman, C., 1993. Is lexical processing just an 'ACT'? In: Collins, A.F., Gathercole, S.E., Conway, M.A., Morris, P.E. (Eds.), Theories of memory. Erlbaum, Hove, UK, pp. 303-326.
22. La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., Willeboordse, E., 1997. The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Manuscript submitted for publication. Univ. of Leiden, The Netherlands.
23. Lapointe, S.G., Dell, G.S., 1989. A synthesis of some recent work in sentence production. In: Carlson, G.N., Tanenhaus, M.K. (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 107-156.
24. Levelt, W.J.M., 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Mallinson, G., Blake, B.J., 1981. Language typology: cross-linguistic studies in syntax. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
26. Nagengast, J., Baumann, H., 1994. NESU experiment specification and execution software, version 4 [computer program]. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
27. Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P.S., 1981. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: Anderson, J.R. (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1-55.
28. Nicol, J.L., 1995. Effects of clausal structure on subject-verb agreement errors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24 (6), 507-516.
29. Pinker, S., 1994. The language instinct: the new science of language and mind. Allen Lane, Penguin Press, London.
30. Pinker, S., Bloom, P., 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, 707-784.
31. Pylyshyn, Z.W., 1984. Computation and cognition: toward a foundation for cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Roelofs, A., 1992. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition 42, 107-142.
33. Schriefers, H., 1993. Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition 19 (4), 841-850.
34. Schriefers, H., 1996. The production of nounphrases in German and French: crosslinguistic studies. Manuscript submitted for publication. Univ. of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
35. Uit den Boogaart, P.C., 1975. Woordfrequenties in Geschreven en Gesproken Nederlands. Oosthoek, Scheltema and Holkema, Utrecht, The Netherlands. (Computerized as the Eindhoven corpus, expanded version distributed by the Free University Amsterdam, 1989).
36. Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., Garrett, M.F., 1997. Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, in press.
37. Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., Semenza, C., 1995. Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: the role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 186-215.
38. Wheeldon, L.R., Monsell, S., 1992. The locus of repetition priming of spoken word production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44A (4), 723-761.
39. Winer, B.J., Brown, D.R., Michels, K.M., 1991. Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York.
40. Zubin, D.A., Köpcke, K.-M., 1981. Gender: a less than arbitrary grammatical category. In: Hendrick, R.A., Masek, C.S., Miller, M.F. (Eds.), Papers from the seventh regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 439-449.