The discourse particle well and its equivalents in Swedish and Dutch

Linguistics

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1123-1161

  Aijmer, Karin ^a   Simon Vandembergen, Anne Marie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345059006     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2003.036     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abraham, Werner (1984). De betekenis en de functie van het Nederlandse wel - een vergelijking met het Duits [The meaning and the function of Dutch wel - a comparison with German]. In Studies over Nederlandse Partikels [Studies on Dutch particles]. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 35, Johan Van der Auwera and Willy Vandeweghe (eds.), 17-46. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
2. (ed.) (1991). Discourse Particles across Languages (special issue). Multilingua 10(1-2).
3. Aijmer, Karin (1977). Partiklarna. ju och väl. Nysvenska studier 57, 205-216.
4. _(1996). Swedish modal particles in a contrastive perspective. Language Sciences 18(1-2), 393-427.
5. _(2002). Modal adverbs of certainty and uncertainty. In Information Structure in a Cross-linguistic Perspective, Hilde Hasselgård, Stig Johannson, Bergljot Behrens, and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds.), 97-112. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
6. _ and Altenberg, Bengt (2002). Zero translations and cross-linguistic equivalence: evidence from the English-Swedish Parallel Corpus. In From the COLT's Mouth, and Other Places: Studies in Honour of Anna-Brita Stenström, Leiv Egil Breivik and Angela Hasselgren (eds.), 19-41. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
7. _ Altenberg, Bengt; and Johansson, Mats (1996). Text-based contrastive studies in English. Presentation of a project. In Languages in Contrast. Papers from a Symposium on Text-based Cross-linguistic Studies in Lund, 4-5 March 1994, Karin Aijmer et al. (eds.), 73-85. Lund: Lund University Press.
8. Allwood, Jens; Nivre, Joakim; and Ahlsén, Elizabeth (1992). On the semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback. Journal of Semantics 9(1), 1-26.
9. Altenberg, Bengt; and Aijmer, Karin (2000). The English-Swedish Parallel Corpus: A resource for contrastive research and translation studies. In Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Papers from the 20th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20) Freiburg im Breisgau 1999, Christian Mair and Marianne Hundt (eds.), 15-33. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Rodopi.
10. Andersen, Gisle; and Fretheim, Thorstein (eds.) (2000). Pragmatic Markers and Prepositional Attitude. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
11. Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
12. Bazzanella, Carla; and Morra, Lucia (2000). Discourse markers and the indeterminacy of translation. In Argomenti per una linguistica della traduzione, On linguistic aspects of translation, Notes pour une linguistique de la traduction, Ioern Korzen and Carla Marello (eds.), 149-157. Alessandria: Edizioni dell' Orso.
13. Bolinger, Dwight (1989). Intonation and its Uses. Melody in Grammar and Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
14. Carlson, Lauri (1984). 'Well' in Dialogue Games: A Discourse Analysis of the Interjection 'well' in Idealized Conversation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
15. Chafe, Wallace (1986). Evidentially in English conversation and academic writing. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds.), 261-272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Crystal, David (1975). The English Tone of Voice. London: Edward Arnold.
17. De Vriendt, Sera; Vandeweghe, Willy; and Van de Craen, Piet (1991). Combinatorial aspects of modal particles in Dutch. Multilingua 10(1-2), 43-59.
18. Downing, Angela (2001). "Surely you know that?" Surely as a marker of evidentially and stance. Functions of Language 8(2), 253-285.
19. Edmondson, Willis; and House, Juliane (1981). Let's Talk and Talk about it: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. Munich: Urban and Schwarzenberg.
20. Finell, Anne (1989). Well now and then. Journal of Pragmatics 13, 653-656.
21. Fischer, Kerstin (2000). From Cognitive Semantics to Lexical Pragmatics. The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Particles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
22. Fleischman, Suzanne; and Yaguello, Marina (1999). Discourse markers in comparative perspective: A contribution to cross-language pragmatics. Handout at the ICLA Conference, Stockholm, July.
23. Foolen, Ad (1984). Maar als modaal partikel in imperatieve zinnen [Maar as modal particle in imperative sentences]. In Studies over Nederlandse Partikels [Studies on Dutch particles]. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 35, Johan Auwera and Willy Vandeweghe (eds.), 67-75. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
24. Fraser, Bruce (1990). An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 3, 383-395.
25. Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6, 322-361.
26. _; and Hasan, Ruqaiya (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
27. Hasselgård, Hilde; Johansson, Stig; Behrens, Bergljot; and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds.) (2002). Information Structure in a Cross-linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
28. Hasselgård, Hilde; and Oksefjell, Signe (eds.) (1999). Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
29. Heinemann, Irmgard (1985). Die Niederländische Partikel wel und ihre Deutschen Entsprechungen. Linguistica Antverpiensia XVII-XIX, 38-58.
30. Hopper, Paul J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization vol.1, Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), 17-35. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
31. Johansson, Stig; and Oksefjell, Signe (eds.) (1998). Corpora and Cross-linguistic Research: Theory, Method and Case Studies. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
32. Jucker, Andreas H. (1993). The discourse marker well. A relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 19(5), 435-453.
33. _(1997). The pragmatic marker well in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics 1, 91-110.
34. Lakoff, Robin (1973). Questionable answers and answerable questions. In Issues in Linguistics, B. B. Kachru et al. (eds.), 453-467. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
35. Lyons, John (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange. APPRAISAL systems in English. In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds.), 142-175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt (1998). The Function of Discourse Particles. A Study with Special Reference to Spoken French. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
38. Noël, Dirk (2003). Translations as evidence for semantics: an illustration. Linguistics 41(4), 757-785.
39. Oxford English Dictionary (1989). 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
40. Paulussen, Hans (1999). A corpus-based contrastive analysis of English 'on/up', Dutch 'op' and French 'sur' within a cognitive framework. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Ghent.
41. Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Schourup, Lawrence (2001). Rethinking well. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1026-1060.
43. Smith, Sara; and Jucker, Andreas H. (2000). Actually and other markers of an apparent discrepancy between prepositional attitudes of conversational partners. In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude, Gisle Andersen and Thorstein Fretheim (eds.), 207-237. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
44. _(2002). Discourse markers as turns. Evidence for the role of intersubjectivity in inter-actional sequences. In Rethinking Sequentially: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, A. Fetzer and C. Meierkord (eds.), 151-178. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
45. Svartvik, Jan (1980). Well in conversation. In Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum et al. (eds.), 167-177. London: Longman.
46. _(1990). The TESS project. In The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and research, Jan Svartvik (ed.), 63-86. Lund: Lund University Press.
47. Teleman, Ulf; Hellberg, Staffan; and Andersson, Erik (1999). Svenska Akademiens Grammatik. Stockholm: Norstedts.
48. Toury, Gideon (1995). Descriptive Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
49. Van As, Saskia (1992). Nu en nou: één woord, twee stijlen [Nu and nou: one word, two styles]. In De kunst van de Grammatica [The art of Grammar], E. C. Schermer-Vermeer et al. (eds.), 1-14. Universiteit van Amsterdam: Vakgroep Nederlandse Taalkunde.
50. Van Dale Groot Woordenboek der Nederlandse Tool (1995). Utrecht/Antwerpen: Van Dale Lexicografie.
51. Van der Auwera, Johan; and Vandeweghe, Willy (1984). Inleiding [Introduction]. In Studies over Nederlandse Partikels [Studies on Dutch particles]. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 35, Johan Van der Auwera and Willy Vandeweghe (eds.), 7-15. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
52. Watts, Richard J. (1987). Relevance in conversational moves: A reappraisal of well. Studio Anglica Posnaniensia XIX, 37-59.
53. _(1989). Taking the pitcher to the 'well': Native speakers' perception of their use of discourse markers in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 13, 203-237.
54. Westheide, Henning (1985). Eine kontrastive Analyse der Partikeln Dt. wohl und N1. wel. Zeitschrift für Germanische Linguistik 13(2), 186-202.
55. _(1991). Dutch moor and North German man - on their use as downtoning particles in related speech economies. Multilingua 10(1-2), 123-138.
56. Weydt, Harald (1969). Abtönungspartikel: Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Bad Homburg: Gehlen.
57. White, Peter (1999). A quick tour through appraisal theory. Background paper for Appraisal workshop, University of Ghent, March 1999.
58. _(2000). Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In Working with dialogue, M. Coulthard et al. (eds.), 67-80. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
59. Wierzbicka, Anna (1976). Particles and linguistic relativity. International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1(2-3), 327-367.
60. Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal (1998 [1882]). The Hague and Leiden: Nijhoff.