Translations as evidence for semantics: An illustration

Linguistics

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 757-785

  Noël, Dirk ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041376547     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2003.024     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Aarts, Jan (1998). Introduction. In Corpora and Crosslinguistic Research: Theory, Method and Case Studies, Stig Johansson and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), ix-xiv. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2. Ajimer, Karin; and Altenberg, Bengt (1996). Introduction. In Languages in Contrast: Papers from a Symposium on Text-Based Cross-Linguistic Studies, Karin Aijmer et al. (eds.), 11-16. Lund: Lund University Press.
3. _; Altenberg, Bengt; and Johansson, Mats (eds.) (1996). Languages in Contrast: Papers from a Symposium on Text-Based Cross-Linguistic Studies, Lund 4-5 March 1994. Lund: Lund University Press.
4. Anderson, Lloyd B. (1986). Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: typologically regular asymmetries. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds.), 273-312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Aston, Guy; and Burnard, Lou (1998). The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
6. Baker, Mona (1999). The role of corpora in investigating the linguistic behaviour of professional translators. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2), 281-298.
7. _; Francis, Gill; and Tognini-Bonelli, Elena (eds.) (1993). Text and Technology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
8. Berry, Margaret (1996). What is theme? - a(nother) personal view. In Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations, Margaret Berry et al. (eds.), 1-64. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Bolinger, Dwight L. (1952). Linear modification. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 67, 1117-1144.
10. Brown, Gillian; and Yule, George (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Burnard, Lou (1995). Users Reference Guide for the British National Corpus. Oxford: Oxford University Computing Services.
12. Chafe, Wallace L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 26-56. New York: Academic Press.
13. _(1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), 21-55. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
14. _; and Nichols, Johanna (eds.) (1986). Evidentially: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Chevalier, Jean-Claude; Blanche-Benveniste, Claire; Arrivé, Michel; and Peytard, Jean (1964). Grammaire Larousse du français contemporain. Paris: Librairie Larousse.
16. Dabi, Östen (1980). Is linguistics empirical? A critique of Esa Itkonen's Linguistics and Metascience. In Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics, Thomas A. Perry (ed.), 133-145. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
17. Daneš, František (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš' (ed.), 106-128. The Hague: Mouton.
18. Derwing, Bruce L. (1980). Against autonomous linguistics. In Evidece and Argumentation in Linguistics, Thomas A. Perry (ed.), 163-189. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
19. Dyvik, Helge (1998). A translational basis for semantics. In Corpora and Crosslinguistic Research: Theory, Method and Case Studies, Stig Johansson and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), 51-86. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
20. Firbas, Jan (1967). On the interplay of means of functional sentence perspective. Proceedings of the International Congress of Linguists 10(2), 740-745.
21. _(1992). Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Francis, Gill; Hunston, Susan; and Manning, Elizabeth (1996). Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.
23. Gellerstam, Martin (1996). Translations as a source for cross-linguistic studies. In Languages in Contrast: Papers from a Symposium on Text-Based Cross-Linguistic Studies, Karin Aijmer et al. (eds.), 53-62. Lund: Lund University Press.
24. Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.) (1995). Thematic Development in English Texts. London: Pinter.
25. Givón, Talmy (1983). Introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Crosslanguage Study, Talmy Givón (ed.), 1-41. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
26. Grevisse, Maurice (1993). Le bon usage: Grammaire française, refondue par André Goosse, treizième édition revue. Paris: Duculot.
27. Haillet, Pierre (1995). Le conditionnel dans le discours journalistique: essai de linguistique descriptive. Neuville, Qué.: Bref.
28. Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3,199-244.
29. _(1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Arnold.
30. Itkonen, Esa (1974). Linguistics and Metascience. Studia Philosophica Turkuensia 2. Kokemäki: Risteen kirjapaino.
31. _(1980). Reply to Dahl. In Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics, Thomas A. Perry (ed.), 146-151. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
32. Johansson, Stig (1998). On the role of corpora in cross-linguistic research. In Corpora and Crosslinguistic Research: Theory, Method and Case Studies, Stig Johansson and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), 3-24. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
33. _; and Oksefjell, Signe (eds.) (1998). Corpora and Crosslinguistic Research: Theory, Method and Case Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
34. Kemmer, Susan; and Barlow, Michael (2000). Using corpora for linguistic analysis: the make causative in English. Paper presented in the forum on "Computer corpora and the study of English" at the 42nd Annual Convention of the Midwest Modern Language Association, Kansas City, November 2-4.
35. Lauridsen, Karen M. (1996). Text corpora and contrastive linguistics: which type of corpus for which type of analysis? In Languages in Contrast: Papers from a Symposium on Text-Based Cross-Linguistic Studies, Karin Aijmer et al. (eds.), 63-71. Lund: Lund University Press.
36. Lehmann, Christian (1995 [1982]). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.
37. Levin, Beth (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Liddicoat, Anthony J. (1997). The function of the conditional in French scientific writing. Linguistics 35(4), 767-780.
39. Mair, Christian (1990). Infinitival Complement Clauses in English: A Study of Syntax in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Melamed, I. Dan (2001). Empirical Methods for Exploiting Parallel Texts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Noël, Dirk (1997). The choice between infinitives and that-clauses after believe. English Language and Linguistics 1(2), 271-284.
42. _(1998). Infinitival copular complement clauses in English: explaining the predominance of passive matrix verbs. Linguistics 36(6), 1045-1063.
43. _(2001). The passive matrices of English infinitival complement clauses: evidentials on the road to auxiliarihood? Studies in Language 25(2), 255-296.
44. Perry, Thomas A. (ed.) (1980). Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
45. Peters, Carol; Picchi, Eugenio; and Biagini, Lisa (2000). Parallel and comparable bilingual corpora in language teaching and learning. In Multilingual Corpora in Teaching and Research, Simon Philip Botley et al. (eds.), 73-85. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
46. Postal, Paul M. (1974). On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Prince, Ellen F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223-255. New York: Academic Press.
48. Ringen, Jon D. (1980). Linguistic facts: a study of the empirical scientific status of transformational generative grammars. In Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics, Thomas A. Perry (ed.), 97-132. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
49. Rudanko, Juhani (2000). Complements of verbs of avoiding over three centuries: a study in the use of electronic corpora. Paper presented in the forum on "Computer corpora and the study of English" at the 42nd Annual Convention of the Midwest Modern Language Association, Kansas City, November 2-4.
50. Salkie, Raphael (1999). How can we unpack a translation corpus? Paper presented at the symposium "Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies: Empirical Approaches," Louvain-la-Neuve, February 5-6.
51. Sanders, Gerald A. (1980). Linguistically-significant attributes of linguistic objects. In Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics, Thomas A. Perry (ed.), 9-46. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
52. Schütze, Carson T. (1996). The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammatically Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Sinclair, John McH. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Teubert, Wolfgang (1999). Corpus linguistics: a partisan view. TELRI Newsletter 8, 4-19. (http://www.telri.de/telri2/newsletter/news18.html)
55. Wagner, Robert Léon; and Pinchon, Jacqueline (1962). Grammaire du français classique et moderne. Paris: Librairie Hachette.
56. Wilmet, Marc (1997). Grammaire critique du Français. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.