Psychosocial Variables, External Barriers, and Stage of Mammography Adoption

Health Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 649-653

  Lauver, Diane Ruth ^a   Henriques, Jeffrey B ^a   Settersten, Lori ^b   Bumann, Mary Carson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Mammography behavior; Transtheoretical model; Triandis's theory of behavior

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHYSICIAN; POPULATION; SAMPLING; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TELEPHONE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 0345017793     PISSN: 02786133     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.649     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brown, R., Baumann, L., Helberg, C., Han, Y., Fontana, S., & Love, R. (1996). The simultaneous analysis of patient, physician and group practice influences on annual mammography performance. Social Science & Medicine, 43, 315-324.
2. Champion, V., & Huster, G. (1995). Effect of interventions on stage of mammography adoption. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 169-187.
3. Lauver, D. (1992). A theory of care-seeking behavior. Image: A Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 24, 281-287.
4. Lauver, D. (1994). Care-seeking behavior with breast cancer symptoms in Caucasian and African-American women. Research in Nursing & Health, 17, 421-431.
5. Lauver, D. (1996). Understanding barriers to mammography use among women of low socioeconomic status: Comparisons from quantitative and qualitative data. Journal of Women's Health, 5, 473-480.
6. Lauver, D., Henriques, J., Owen, B., Egan, J., & Lovejoy, L. (2003). Relationships of practitioner communications and characteristics with women's mammography use. Patient Education & Counseling, 51, 65-74.
7. Lauver, D., & Kane, J. (1999). A motivational message, external barriers, and mammography utilization. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 23, 254-264.
8. Lauver, D., Kane, J., Bodden, J., McNeel, J., & Smith, L. (1999). Engagement in breast screening behaviors. Oncology Nursing Forum, 26, 545-554.
9. Lauver, D., Settersten, L., Kane, J., & Henriques, J. (2003). Tailored messages, external barriers, and women's utilization of professional breast cancer screening over time: A randomized clinical trial. Cancer, 97, 2724-2735.
10. Marcus, B., Rakowski, W., & Rossi, J. (1992). Assessing motivational readiness and decision making for exercise. Health Psychology, 11, 257-261.
11. McNair, D., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. (1971). Profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
12. Melnyk, K. (1990). Barriers to care, operationalizing the variable. Nursing Research, 39, 108-112.
13. Montano, D., & Taplin, S. (1991). A test of theory to predict mammography. Social Science & Medicine, 32, 733-741.
14. Pearlman, D. N., Rakowski, W., & Ehrich, B. (1995). The information environment of women and mammography screening: Assessing reciprocity in social relationships. Journal of Women's Health, 4, 541-553.
15. Prochaska, J., & Velicer, W. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12, 38-48.
16. Prochaska, J., Velicer, W., Rossi, J., Goldstein, M., Marcus, B., Rakowski, W., et al. (1994). Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology, 13, 39-46.
17. Rakowski, W., Dube, C., Goldstein, M. (1996). Considerations for extending the transtheoretical model of behavioral change to screening mammography. Health Education Research: Theory & Practice, 11, 77-96.
18. Rakowski, W., Dube, C., Marcus, B., Prochaska, J., Velicer, W., & Abrams, D. (1992). Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography. Health Psychology, 11, 111-118.
19. Rakowski, W., Ehrich, B., Dube, C., Pearlman, D., Goldstein, M., Peterson, K., et al. (1996). Screening mammography and constructs from the theoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 91-100.
20. Rakowski, W., Ehrich, B., Goldstein, M., Rimer, B., Pearlman, D., Clark, M., et al. (1998). Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Preventive Medicine, 27, 748-756.
21. Rakowski, W., Stoddard, A., Rimer, B., Fox, S., Andersen, M., Urban, N., et al. (1997). Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography. Health Psychology, 16, 433-441.
22. Skinner, C., Champion, V., Gonin, R., & Hanna, M. (1997). Do perceived barriers and benefits vary by mammography stage? Psychology, Health, & Medicine, 2, 65-75.
23. Stoddard, A., Rimer, B., Lane, D., Fox, S., Lipkus, I., Luckmann, R., et al. (1998). Underusers of mammogram screening: Stage of adoption in five U.S. subpopulations. Preventive Medicine, 27, 478-487.
24. Triandis, H. (1980). Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior. In M. Page (Ed.), 1979 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 195-259). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.