Relationships of practitioner communications and characteristics with women's mammography use

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 65-74

  Lauver, Diane Ruth ^a   Owen, Brenda ^a   Egan, Judith ^a   Lovejoy, Linda Sue ^a   Henriques, Jeffrey B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Mammography; Patient acceptance of health care; Practitioner practice patterns

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT INFORMATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELEPHONE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 0043209038     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00166-0     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Harris K.M., Vogel V.G. Breast cancer screening. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 16:1997;231-262.
2. Kerlikowski K., Grady D., Rubin S.M., Sandrock C., Ernste V.L. Efficacy of screening mammography: meta-analysis. JAMA. 273:1995;149-154.
3. McCarthy E.P., Burns R.B., Freund K.M., Ash A.S., Shwartz M., Marwill S.L.et al. Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 48:2000;1226-1233.
4. Behavioral Surveillance Branch. 1996 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance summary prevalence report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services
5. Behavioral Surveillance Branch. 1996 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance summary prevalence report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services; 1997.
6. Rakowski W., Pearlman D., Rimer B.K., Ehrich B. Correlates of mammography among women with low and high socioeconomic resources. Prev. Med. 24:1995;149-158.
7. Pearlman D.N., Ehrich B., Rakowski W., Clark M.A. Breast cancer screening practices among black, hispanic, and white women: reassessing differences. Am. J. Prev. Med. 12:1996;327-337.
8. Barton M.B., Moore S., Shtatland E., Bright R. The relation of household income to mammography utilization in a prepaid health care system. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 16:2001;200-203.
9. Healthy People 2010. Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health, vol. 2. 2nd ed. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; 2000.
10. Champion V., Miller A. Recent mammography in women aged 35 and older: predisposing variables. Health Care Women Int. 17:1996;233-245.
11. Lemkau J.P., Grady K., Carlson S. Maximizing the referral of older women for screening mammography. Arch. Fam. Med. 5:1996;174-178.
12. Miller A.M., Champion V.L. Mammography in older women: one-time and 3-year adherence to guidelines. Nurs. Res. 45(4):1996;239-245.
13. Rakowski W., Ehrich B., Dube C.E., Pearlman D.N., Goldstein M.G., Peterson K.K.et al. Screening mammography and constructs from Transtheoretical Model: associations using two definitions of the stages of-adoption. Ann. Behav. Med. 18:1996;91-100.
14. Skinner C.S., Champion V.L., Gonin R., Hanna M. Do perceived barriers and benefits vary by mammography stage? Psychol. Health Med. 2:1997;65-75.
15. Hynes D.M., Bastian L.A., Rimer B.K., Sloane R., Feussner J.R. Predictors of mammography use among women veterans. J. Women's Health. 7:1998;239-247.
16. Schillinger J.A., Mosbaek C., Austin D., Jack L. Jr., Heumann M., Moore J.et al. Health care reform in Oregon: the impact of the Oregon Health Plan on utilization of mammography. Am. J. Prev. Med. 18:2000;11-17.
17. Lane D., Caplan L., Grimson R. Trends in mammography use and their relation to physician and other factors. Cancer Detect. Prev. 20:1996;332-341.
18. Rimer B.K., Halabi S., Strigo T.S., Crawford Y., Lipkus I.M. Confusion about mammography: prevalence and consequences. J. Women's Health Gender Based Med. 8:1999;509-519.
19. Kok G., Borne B.V., Mullan P.D. Effectiveness of health education and health promotion: meta analyses of effect studies and determinants of effectiveness. Patient Educ. Couns. 30:1997;19-27.
20. Mead N., Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 51:2000;1087-1110.
21. Roter D.L., Hall J.A., Merisca R., Nordstrom B., Cretin D., Svarstad B. Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis. Med. Care. 36:1998;1138-1161.
22. White M.K., Malek T. Teaching clinician-patient communication in the treatment of breast diseases. J. Women's Health. 8:1999;39-44.
23. Fox S.A., Murata P.J., Stein J.A. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch. Intern. Med. 151:1991;50-56.
24. Fox S.A., Roetzheim R.G., Kington R.S. Barriers to cancer prevention in the older person. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 13:1997;79-95.
25. May D.S., Kiefe C.I., Funkhouser E., Fouad M.N. Compliance with mammography guidelines: physician recommendations and patient adherence. Prev. Med. 28:1999;386-394.
26. Marcus A.C., Bastani R., Reardon K., Karlins S., Prabhu Das I.et al. Proactive screening mammography counseling within the Cancer Information Service: results from a randomized trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 14:1993;119-129.
27. Simon S.R., Lee T.H., Goldman L., McDonough A.L., Pearson S.D. Communication problems for patients hospitalized with chest pain. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 13:1998;836-838.
28. Schneider E.C., Zaslavsky A.M., Landon B.E., Lied T.R., Sheingold S., Cleary P.D. National quality monitoring of medicare health plans: the relationship between enrollees' reports and the quality of clinical care. Med. Care. 39:2001;1313-1325.
29. Mayer-Oakes S.A., Atchinson K.A., Mattias R.E., DeJong F.J., Lubben J., Schweitzer S.O. Mammography use in older women with regular physicians: what are the predictors? Am. J. Prev. Med. 12:1996;44-50.
30. van den Brink-Muinen A.V., Bensing J.M., Kerssens J.J. Gender and communication style in general practice: differences between women's health care and regular health care. Med. Care. 36:1998;100-106.
31. McCarthy B.D., Yood M.V., McWilliam C.H., Lee M.J. Screening mammography use: the importance of a population perspective. Am. J. Prev. Med. 12:1996;91-95.
32. Barr J.K., Franks A.L., Lee N.C., Herther P., Schachter M. Factors associated with continued participation in mammography screening. Prev. Med. 33:2001;661-667.
33. Roter D.L., Stewart M., Putnam S.M., Lipkin M., Stiles W., Iniu T.S. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 277:1997;350-356.
34. Lurie N., Slater J., McGovern P., Ekstrum J., Quam L., Margolis K. Preventive care for women: does the sex of the physician matter. New. Engl. J. Med. 329:1993;478-482.
35. Franks P., Clancy C.M. Physician gender bias in clinical decision-making: screening for cancer in primary care. Med. Care. 31:1993;213-218.
36. Hall J.A., Irish J.T., Roter D.L., Ehrlich C.M., Miller L.H. Satisfaction, gender, and communication in medical visits. Med. Care. 32:1994;1216-1231.
37. Ahmad F., Stewart D.E., Dameron J.I., Hyman I. Rural physicians' perspectives on cervical and breast cancer screening: a gender-based analysis. J. Women's Health Gender Based Med. 10:2001;201-208.
38. Cassard S.D., Weisman C.S., Plichta S.B., Johnson T.L. Physician gender and women's preventive services. J. Women's Health. 6:1997;199-207.
39. Lauver DR, Settersten L, Kane JH, Henriques JB. Tailored messages, external barriers, and women's utilization of professional breast cancer screening over time: a randomized clinical trial. Under review.
40. Mandelblatt JS, Wheat ME, Monane M, Moshief RD, Hollenberg JP, Tang J. Breast cancer screening for elderly women with and without comorbid conditions: a decision analysis. Ann. Int. Med. 1992;116:722-730
41. Fletcher S.W., Black W., Harris R., Rimer B.K., Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85:1993;1644-1656.
42. National Cancer Institute. Expert board gives advice to NCI on breast cancer screening guidelines 1987. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:1795.
43. United States Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Alexandria (VA): International Medical Publishing; 1996.
44. Newcomb P.A., Egan K.M., Titus-Ernstoff L.et al. Lactation in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer. Am. J. Epidemiol. 150:1999;174-182.
45. Owens R., Heron K. Estimates of delay in seeking breast cancer diagnosis. J. Psychosocial. Oncol. 7:1989;193-197.
46. Champion V. Strategies to increase mammography utilization. Med. Care. 32:1994;118-129.
47. Champion V., Huster G. Effect of interventions on stage of mammography adoption. J. Behav. Med. 18:1995;169-187.
48. Trock B., Rimer B., King E., Balshem A., Cristinzio C., Engstrom P. Impact of an HMO-based intervention to increase mammography utilization. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2:1993;151-156.
49. Etzi S., Lane D.S., Grimson R. The use of mammography vans by low-income women: the accuracy of self-reports. Am. J. Public Health. 84:1994;107-109.
50. Kottke T.E., Trapp M.A., Fores M.M., Kelly A.W., Jung S., Novotny P.J.et al. Cancer screening behaviors and attitudes of women in southeastern Minnesota. JAMA. 273:1995;1099-1105.
51. McGovern P.G., Lurie N., Margolis K.L., Slater J.S. Accuracy of self-report of mammography and pap smear in a low-income urban population. Am. J. Prev. Med. 14:1998;201-208.
52. Lauver D. Understanding barriers to mammography use among women of low socioeconomic status: comparisons from quantitative and qualitative data. J. Women's Health. 5:1996;473-480.
53. Ware J.E., Snyder M.K., Wright W.R., Davies A.R. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval. Prog. Plann. 6:1983;247-263.
54. SPSS for Windows, Release 10.1.4 (16 March 2001), Copyright SPSS Inc., 1989-2000.
55. Dolan N.C., Reifler D.R., McDermott M.M., McGaghie W.C. Adherence to screening mammography recommendations in a university general medicine clinic. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 10:1995;299-306.
56. Grady K.E., Lemkau J.P., McVay J.M., Reisine S.T. The importance of physician encouragement in breast cancer screening of older women. Prev. Med. 21:1992;766-780.
57. Rimer B.K., Resch N., King E.et al. Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older. Public Health Rep. 107:1992;369-380.
58. Rakowski W., Ehrich B., Goldstein M., Reimer B., Pearlman D., Clark M.et al. Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched tailored intervention. Prev. Med. 27:1998;748-756.
59. Skinner C.S., Strecher V.J., Hospers H. Physician recommendation for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? Am. J. Public Health. 84:1994;43-49.
60. Lane D., Messina C.R. Methodology for targeting physicians for interventions to improve breast cancer screening. Am. J. Prev. Med. 16:1999;289-297.
61. Conlisk E., Herrick H., Passaro K. Patients' reports of counseling on mammography screening by health care providers, North Carolina, 1997. MMWR. 48:1999;356-358.
62. Costanza M.E., Greene H.L., McManus D., Hoople N.E., Barth R. Can practicing physicians improve their counseling and physician examination skills in breast cancer screening? J. Cancer Educ. 10:1995;14-21.