The simultaneous analysis of patient, physician and group practice influences on annual mammography performance

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 315-324

  Brown, Roger L ^a   Baumann, Linda J ^a   Helberg, Clay P ^a   Han, Youngshook ^a   Fontana, Susan A ^b   Love, Richard R ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Hierarchical regression; Mammography; Social norms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; FEMALE; GROUP PRACTICE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030218807     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00379-7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. 1. Marchant D. J., Sutton S. M., Jones R. and Smith K. Use of mammography: United States. Morb. Mort. Wkly Rep. 39, 621, 1990.
2. 2. Horton J. A., Romans M. C. and Cruess D, F. Mammography attitudes and usage study. Women's Health Issues 2, 180, 1992.
3. 3. Mettlin C. and Smart C. R. Breast cancer detection guidelines for women aged 40 to 49 years: rationale for the American Cancer Society reaffirmation of recommendations. CA: Cancer J. Clinicians 44, 248, 1994.
4. 4. Kaluzny A. D., Rimer B. and Harris R. The National Cancer Institute and guidelines development: lessons from the breast cancer screening controversy. J. Natn. Cancer Inst. 86, 901, 1994.
5. 5. Smith R. A. and Haynes S. Barriers to screening for breast cancer. Cancer Suppl. 69, 1968, 1991.
6. 6. Romans M. C. Utilization of mammography. Cancer 72, 1475, 1993.
7. 7. NCI, BCSC. Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies. JAMA 264, 54, 1990.
8. 8. Triandis H. C. Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In Nebraska Symp. Motivation (Edited by Howe H. E.); pp. 195-259. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 1980.
9. 9. Triandis H. C. A model of choice in marketing. In Research in Marketing: Choice Models for Buyer Behavior (Supplement 1) (Edited by McAlister L.), pp. 147-162. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut, 1982.
10. 10. Cameron L. D. and Leventhal H. Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. Pat. Educ. Couns. 10, 117, 1987.
11. 11. Baumann L. J., Brown R. L., Fontana S. A. and Cameron L. Assessing a theoretical model of mammography intention. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 23, 1733, 1993.
12. 12. Fishbein M. A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications. Presented at the 1979 Nebraska Symp. Motivation, Lincoln, NB, 1980.
13. 13. Lerman C., Rimer B., Trock B., Balshem A. and Ingstrom P. F. Factors associated with repeated adherence to breast cancer screening. Prevent. Med. 19, 279, 1990.
14. 14. Miller A. M. and Champion V. L. Mammography in women ≥50 years of age. Cancer Nurs. 16, 260, 1993.
15. 15. Fox S. A. and Stein J. A. The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med. Care 29, 1065, 1991.
16. 16. Fulton J. P., Buechner J. S., Scott H. D., DeBuono B. A., Feldman J. P., Smith R. A. and Kovenock D. A study guided by the health belief model of the predictors of breast cancer screening of women ages 40 and older. Publ. Hlth Rep. 106, 410, 1991.
17. 17. Champion V. L. The relationship of selected variables to breast cancer detection behaviors in women 35 and older. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 18, 733, 1991.
18. 18. Rimer B., Trock B., Engstrom P., Lerman C. and King E. Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am. J. Prevent. Med. 7, 69, 1991.
19. 19. Baines C. J., To T. and Wall C. Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the national breast screening study. Cancer 65, 1663, 1990.
20. 20. Champion V. L. Compliance with guidelines for mammography screening. Cancer Detect. Prevent. 16, 253, 1992.
21. 21. Kurtz M. E., Given B., Given C. W. and Kurtz J. C. Relationships of barriers and facilitators to breast self-examination, mammography and clinical breast examination in a worksite population. Cancer Nurs. 16, 251, 1993.
22. 22. Buechner J. S., Fulton J. P., Feldman J. P., DeBuono B. A. and Kovenock D. Trends in breast cancer screening: Rhode Island, 1987-1989. Morb. Mort. Wkly Rep. 38, 569, 1989.
23. 23. Zapka J. G., Stoddard A., Maul L. and Costanza M. E. Interval adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Med. Care 29, 697, 1991.
24. 24. ACS. 1989 survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. CA-A 40, 77, 1990.
25. 25. Smith M. D., Altman D. E., Leitman R. et al. Taking the public's pulse on health system reform. Hlth Affairs 11, 125, 1992.
26. 26. Black J. S., Sefcik T. and Kapoor W. Health promotion and disease prevention in the elderly. Arch. Int. Med. 150, 389, 1990.
27. 27. Rimer B. K., Keintz M. K., Kessler H. B., Engstrom P. F. and Rosan J. R. Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers. Radiology 172, 243, 1989.
28. 28. Burg M. A. and Lane D. S. Mammography referrals for elderly women: is Medicare reimbursement likely to make a difference? Hlth Serv. Res. 27, 505, 1992.
29. 29. Lurie N., Slater J., McGovern P., Ekstrum P., Quam L. and Margolis K. Preventive care for women: does the sex of the physician matter? N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 1356, 1993.
30. 30. Belcher D. W., Berg A. D. and Inui T. S. Practical approaches to providing better preventive care: are physicians a problem or a solution? Am. J. Prevent. Med. 4, 27, 1988.
31. 31. McPhee S. J. and Bird J. A. Implementation of cancer prevention guidelines in clinical practice. JGIM 5, S116, 1990.
32. 32. Frame P. S. and Werth P. L. How primary health care providers can integrate cancer prevention into practice. Cancer 72, 1132, 1993.
33. 33. Walsh J. M. E. and McPhee S. J. A systems model of clinical preventive care: an analysis of factors influencing patient and physician. Hlth Educ. Q. 19, 158, 1992.
34. 34. Fox S. A., Klos D. S. and Tsou C. V. Underuse of screening mammography by family physicians. Radiology 166, 431, 1988.
35. 35. Weinberger M., Saunders A. F., Samsa G. P., Bearon L. B., Gold D. T., Brown J. T., Booher P. and Loehrer P. J. Breast cancer screening in older women: practices and barriers reported by primary care physicians. JAGS 39, 22, 1991.
36. 36. Graham L., Smith R. A., Peters D. and Ronan L. A survey of Maine primary care physicians on issues related to breast cancer screening. Presented at the Prevention 90, Atlanta, GA, 1990.
37. 37. Brown R. L. The use of multilevel hierarchical linear modeling in primary care research. Presented at the Fifth Annual Primary Care Res. Methods and Statistics Conf., San Antonio, 1990.
38. 38. Hosmer D. W. and Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989.
39. 39. Aitkin M., Anderson D., Francis B. and Hinde J. Statistical Modeling in GLIM. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989.
40. 40. Goldstein H. Nonlinear multilevel models, with an application to discrete response data. Biometrika 78, 45, 1991.
41. 41. Presser R., Rasbash J. and Goldstein H. ML3 Software for Three-level Analysis: Users' Guide. Institute of Education, University of London, London, 1990.
42. 42. Paterson L. Multilevel logistic regression. In Data Analysis with ML3 (Edited by Prosser R.). Institute of Education, University of London, London, 1993.
43. 43. Paterson L. Entry to University by school leavers. A Guide to ML3 for New Users. Institute of Education, University of London, London, 1993.
44. 44. Demographic Services Center. 1990 Census of Population: characteristics of the population of the state of Wisconsin. Bureau of Intergovernmental Relations, 1991. (Electronic Data Tape).
45. 45. Department of Health and Social Services. Behavioral Risk Factors 1993. Division of Health, State of Wisconsin, 1994.
46. 46. Kang S. H. and Bloom J. R. Social support and cancer screening among older Black Americans. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 85, 737, 1993.
47. 47. Kang S. H., Bloom J. R. and Romano P. S. Cancer screening among African-American women: their use of tests and social support. Am. J. publ. Hlth 84, 101, 1994.