Relationship between motion VEP and perceived velocity of gratings: Effects of stimulus speed and motion adaptation

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 115-126

  Müller, Rolf ^a   Bochmann, Gunder ^a   Greenlee, Mark W ^b   Göpfert, Edith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Motion adaptation; Motion VEP; Perceived speed; Speed channels; Stationary adaptation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CELL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; NERVE CELL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; VELOCITY; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0344943266     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026246404560     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Foster KH, Gaska JP, Nagler M, Pollen DA. Spatial and temporal frequency selectivity of neurons in visual cortical areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. J Physiol (London) 1985; 365: 331-63.
2. Lagae L, Raiguel S, Orban GA. Speed and direction selectivity of macaque middle temporal neurons. J Neurophysiol 1993; 69: 19-39.
3. Cheng K, Hasegawa T, Saleem KS, Tanaka K. Comparison of neuronal selectivity for stimulus speed, length, and contrast in the prestriate visual cortical areas V4 and MT of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 1994; 71: 2269-80.
4. Gegenfurtner KR, Kiper DC, Levitt JB. Functional properties of neurons in macaque area V3. J Neurophysiol 1997; 77: 1906-23.
5. Göpfert E, Müller R, Markwardt F, Schlykowa L. Visuell evozierte Potentiale bei Musterbewegung. Z EEG-EMG 1983; 14: 47-51.
6. Bach M, Ullrich D. Motion adaptation governs the shape of motion-evoked cortical potentials. Vision Res 1994; 34: 1541-47.
7. Kubova Z, Kuba M, Spekreijse H, Blakemore C. Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials. Vision Res 1995; 35: 197-205.
8. Göpfert E, Müller R, Breuer D, Greenlee MW. Similarities and dissimilarities between pattern VEPs and motion VEPs. Doc Ophthalmol 1999; 97: 67-79.
9. Watson AB, Robson JG. Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision. Vision Res 1981; 21: 1115-22.
10. Thompson P. Discrimination of moving gratings at and above detection threshold. Vision Res 1983; 23: 1533-38.
11. Mandler MB. Temporal frequency discrimination above threshold. Vision Res 1984; 24: 1873-80.
12. Mandler MB, Makous W. A three channel model of temporal frequency perception. Vision Res 1984; 24: 1881-7.
13. Yo C, Wilson HR. Peripheral temporal frequency channels code frequency and speed inaccurately but allow accurate discrimination. Vision Res 1993; 33: 33-45.
14. Smith AT, Edgar GK. Antagonistic comparison of temporal frequency filter outputs as a basis for speed perception. Vision Res 1994; 34: 253-65.
15. Schrater PR, Simoncelli EP. Local velocity representation: Evidence from motion adaptation. Vision Res 1998; 38: 3899-912.
16. Torriente I, Valdes-Sosa M, Ramirez D, Bobes MA. Visual evoked potentials related to motion-onset are modulated by attention. Vision Res 1999; 39: 4122-39.
17. Smith AT, Singh KD, Greenlee MW. Attentional suppression of activity in the human visual cortex. NeuroReport 2000; 11: 271-7.
18. Mecacci L, Spinelli D. The effects of spatial frequency adaptation on human evoked potentials. Vision Res 1976; 16: 477-9.
19. Smith AT, Jeffreys DA. Size and orientation specificity of transient visual evoked potentials in man. Vision Res 1978; 18: 651-5.
20. Müller R, Göpfert E, Hartwig M. VEP-Untersuchungen zur Kodierung der Geschwindigkeit bewegter Streifenmuster im Kortex des Menschen. Z EEG-EMG 1985; 16: 75-80.
21. Müller R, Göpfert E, Breuer D, Greenlee MW. Motion VEPs with simultaneous measurement of perceived velocity. Doc Ophthalmol 1999; 97: 121-34.
22. Bach M, Ullrich D. Contrast dependency of motion-onset and pattern-reversal VEPs: Interaction of stimulus type, recording site and response component. Vision Res 1997; 37: 1845-49.
23. Hoffmann M, Dorn TJ, Bach M. Time course of motion adaptation: Motion-onset visual evoked potentials and subjective estimates. Vision Res 1999; 39: 437-44.
24. Markwardt F, Göpfert E, Müller R. Influence of velocity, temporal frequency and initial phase position of grating patterns on motion VEP. Biomed Biochim Acta 1988; 47: 753-60.
25. Göpfert E, Müller R, Simon EM. The human motion onset VEP as a function of stimulation area for foveal and peripheral vision. Doc Ophthalmol 1990; 75: 165-73.
26. Rovamo J, Virsu V. An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Exp Brain Res 1979; 37: 495-510.
27. Tootell RBH, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Malach R, Born RT, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, Belliveau JW. Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 3215-30.
28. Lieberman H, Pentland AP. Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The best PEST. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1982; 14: 21-5.
29. Müller R, Greenlee MW. Effect of contrast and adaptation on the perception of the direction and speed of drifting gratings. Vision Res 1994; 34: 2071-92.
30. Mackie RT, McCulloch DL, Bradnam MS, Glegg M, Evans AL. The effect of motion on pattern-onset visual evoked potentials in adults and children. Doc Ophthalmol 1996; 91: 371-80.
31. Heeger DJ. Model of the extraction of image flow. J Opt Soc Am A 1987; 4: 1455-71.
32. Maunsell JHR, Van Essen DC. Topografic organization of the middle temporal visual area in the macaque monkey: Representational biases and the relationship to callosal connections and myeloarchitectonic boundaries. J Comp Neurol 1987; 266: 535-55.
33. Albright TD, Desimone R. Local precision of visuotopic organization in the middle temporal area (MT) of the macaque. Exp Brain Res 1987; 65: 582-92.
34. Tootell RBH, Mendola JD, Hadjikhani NK, Liu AK, Dale AM. The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 818-24.
35. Chen Y, Bedell HE, Frishman LJ. The precision of velocity discrimination across spatial frequency. Percep Psychophys 1998; 60: 1329-36.
36. Magnussen S, Greenlee MW. Retention and disruption of motion information in visual short term memory. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 1992; 18: 151-6.
37. Magnussen S, Greenlee MW. The psychophysics of perceptual memory. Psychol Res 1999; 62: 81-92.
38. Snowden RJ, Hess RF. Temporal frequency filters in the human peripheral visual field. Vision Res 1992; 32: 61-72.
39. Hess RF, Snowden RJ. Temporal properties of human visual filters: Number, shapes and spatial covariation. Vision Res 1992; 32: 47-59.
40. Heeger DJ. Modeling simple-cell direction selectivity with normalized, half-squared, linear operators. J Neurophysiol 1993; 70: 1885-98.
41. Thomas JP, Olzak LA. Contrast gain control and fine spatial discriminations. J Opt Soc Am A 1997; 14: 2392-405.
42. Schiller PH, Logothetis K, Charles ER. Functions of the colour-opponent and broad-band channels of the visual system. Nature 1990; 343: 68-70.
43. Smith RA. Studies of temporal frequency adaptation in visual contrast sensitivity. J Physiol 1971; 216: 531-52.
44. Blakemore C, Campbell FW. On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol 1969; 203: 237-60.