Novel-object place conditioning in adolescent and adult male and female rats: Effects of social isolation

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 80, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 317-325

  Douglas, Lewis A ^a   Varlinskaya, Elena I ^a   Spear, Linda P ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Conditioned place preference; Novelty; Rats; Sex differences; Social isolation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULTHOOD; AGE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; MALE; NONHUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PLACE PREFERENCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REWARD; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SPECIES COMPARISON; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STRESS;

EID: 0344585483     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Arnett J. Sensation seeking: a new conceptualization and a new scale. Pers. Individ. Differ. 16:1994;289-296.
2. Trimpop R.M., Kerr J.H., Kirkcaldy B.D. Comparing personality constructs of risk-taking behavior. Pers. Individ. Differ. 26:1999;237-254.
3. Bardo M.T., Donohew R.L., Harrington N.G. Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior. Behav. Brain Res. 77:1996;23-43.
4. Bates M.E., Labouvie E.W., White H.R. The effects of sensation seeking needs on alcohol and marijuana use in adolescence. Bull. Soc. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 5:1986;29-36.
5. Forsyth G., Hundleby J.D. Personality and situation as determinants of desire to drink in young adults. Int. J. Addict. 22:1987;653-669.
6. Zuckerman M. Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. 1994;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Spear L.P. The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24:2000;417-463.
8. Adriani W., Chiarotti F., Laviola G. Elevated novelty seeking and peculiar D-amphetamine sensation in periadolescent mice compared with adult mice. Behav. Neurosci. 112:1998;1152-1166.
9. Spear L.P., Brake S.C. Periadolescence: age-dependent behavior and psychopharmacological responsivity in rats. Dev. Psychobiol. 16:1983;83-109.
10. Renner M.J., Rosenweig M.R. Object interaction in juvenile rats (Rattus norvegicus): effects of different experimental history. J. Comp. Psychol. 100:1986;229-236.
11. Martin S.S., Robbins C.A., Kaplan H.B. Drugs, crime, and other deviant adaptations: longitudinal studies. Longitudinal research in the social and behavioral sciences: an interdisciplinary series. 1995;145-161 Plenum, New York.
12. Sackett G.P. Exploratory behavior of rhesus monkeys as a function of rearing experiences and sex. Dev. Psychol. 6:1972;260-270.
13. Hall F.S. Social deprivation of neonatal, adolescent, and adult rats has distinct neurochemical and behavioral consequences. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 12:1998;129-162.
14. Einon D.R., Morgan M.J. Early isolation produces enduring hyperactivity in the rat but no effect upon spontaneous alteration. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 30:1978;151-156.
15. Gentch C., Lichtsteiner M., Kraeuchi K., Feer H. Different reaction patterns in individually and socially reared rats during exposures to novel environments. Behav. Brain Res. 4:1982;45-54.
16. Sahakian B.J., Robbins T.W., Iverson S.D. The effects of isolation rearing on exploration in the rat. Anim. Learn. Behav. 5:1977;193-198.
17. Einon D.R., Morgan M.J. Habituation of object contact in socially-reared and isolated rats. Anim. Behav. 24:1976;415-420.
18. Einon D.R., Morgan M.J. A critical period for social isolation in the rat. Dev. Psychobiol. 10:1977;123-132.
19. Besheer J., Hensen H.C., Bevins R.A. Dopamine antagonism in a novel-object recognition and a novel-object place conditioning preparation. Behav. Brain Res. 103:1999;35-44.
20. Bevins R.A., Bardo M.T. Conditioned increase in place preference by access to novel objects: antagonism by MK-801. Behav. Brain Res. 99:1999;53-60.
21. Bevins R.A., Besheer J., Palmatier M.I., Jensen H.C., Pickett K.S., Eurek S. Novel-object place conditioning: behavioral and dopaminergic processes in expression of novelty reward. Behav. Brain Res. 129:2002;41-50.
22. National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. (DHEW Publication No. 86-23):1986;U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
23. Holson R.R., Pearce B. Principles and pitfalls in the analysis of prenatal treatment effects in multiparous species. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 14:1992;221-228.
24. Oppenheim R.W. Ontogenetic adaptations and retrogressive processes in the development of the nervous system and behaviour: a neuroembryological perspective. Connolly K.J., Prechhtl H.F.R. Maturation and development: biological and psychological perspectives. 1981;73-109 Lippincott, Philadelphia.
25. Spear L.P., Shalaby I.A., Brick J. Chronic administration of haloperidol during development: behavioral and psychopharmacological effects. Psychopharmacology. 70:1980;47-58.
26. Hall F.S., Humby T., Wilkinson L.S., Robbins T.W. The effects of isolation-rearing of rats on behavioral responses to food and environmental novelty. Physiol. Behav. 62:1997;281-290.
27. Einon D.F., Tye N.C. Chlordiazepoxide and isolation-induced timidity in rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berlin). 44:1975;85-88.
28. Zimmerman A., Stauffacher M., Langhans W., Würbel H. Enrichment-dependent differences in novelty exploration in rats can be explained by habituation. Behav. Brain Res. 121:2001;11-20.
29. Parker V., Morinan A. The socially isolated rat as a model of anxiety. Neuropharmacology. 25:1986;663-664.
30. Wright I.K., Upton N., Marsden C.A. Resocialization of isolation-reared rats does not alter their anxiogenic profile on the elevated x-maze model of anxiety. Physiol. Behav. 50:1991;1129-1132.
31. Hall F.S., Humby T., Wilkinson L.S., Robbins T.W. The effects of isolation-rearing on preference by rats for a novel environment. Physiol. Behav. 62:1997;299-303.
32. Vastola B.J., Douglas L.A., Varlinskaya E.I., Spear L.P. Nicotine-induced place preference in adolescent and adult rats. Physiol. Behav. 77:2002;107-114.
33. Campbell J.O., Wood R.D., Spear L.P. Cocaine and morphine-induced place conditioning in adolescent and adult rats. Physiol. Behav. 68:2000;487-493.
34. Andersen S.L., Dumont N.L., Teicher M.H. Developmental differences in dopamine synthesis inhibition by (±)-7-OH-DPAT. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 356:1997;173-181.
35. Teicher M.H., Barber N.I., Gelbard H.A., Gallitano A.L., Campbell A., Marsh E.et al. Developmental differences in acute nigrostriatal and mesocorticolimbic system response to haloperidol. Neuropsychopharmacology. 9:1993;147-156.
36. Blanc G., Herve D., Simon H., Lisopraws A., Glowinski J., Tassin J.P. Response to stress of mesocortical-frontal dopaminergic neurons in rats after long term isolation. Nature. 284:1980;265-267.
37. Holson R.R., Ali S.F., Scallet A.C. The effect of isolation rearing and stress on monoamines in forebrain nigrostiatal, mesolimbic, and mesocortical dopamine systems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 537:1988;512-514.
38. Jones G.H., Hernandez T.D., Kendall D.A., Marsden C.A., Robbins T.W. Dopaminergic and serotonergic function following isolation rearing in rats: study of behavioural responses and postmortem and in vivo neurochemistry. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 43:1992;17-35.
39. Heidbreder C.A., Weiss I.C., Domeney A.M., Pryce C., Homberg J., Hedou G.et al. Behavioral, neurochemical and endocrinological characterization of the early social isolation syndrome. Neuroscience. 100:2000;749-768.
40. Cabib S., Ventura R., Puglisi-Allegra S. Opposite imbalances between mesocortical and mesoaccumbens dopamine responses to stress by the same genotype depending on living conditions. Behav. Brain Res. 129:2002;179-185.
41. McKinney W.T. Animal models of depression: an overview. Psychiatr. Dev. 2:1984;77-96.
42. Polanza P. Animal models of anxiety and depression: how are females different? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25:2001;219-233.
43. Galea L.A., McEwen B.S., Tanapat P., Deak T., Spencer R.L., Dhabhar F.S. Sex differences in dendritic atrophy of CA3 pyramidal neurons in response to chronic restraint stress. Neuroscience. 81:1997;689-697.
44. Haleem D., Kennett G., Curzon G. Adaptation of female rats to stress: shift to male pattern by inhibition of corticosterone synthesis. Brain Res. 458:1988;339-347.
45. Kennett G., Chaouloff F., Marcou M., Curzon G. Female rats are more vulnerable than males in an animal model of depression: the possible role of serotonin. Brain Res. 382:1986;416-421.
46. Servatius R.J., Shors T.J. Exposure to inescapable stress persistently facilitates associative and nonassociative learning in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 108:1994;1101-1106.
47. Shors T.J., Weiss C., Thompson R.F. Stress-induced facilitation of classical conditioning. Science. 257:1992;537-539.
48. Wood G.E., Shors T.J. Stress facilitates classical conditioning in males, but impairs classical conditioning in females through activational effects of ovarian hormones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:1998;4066-4071.
49. Bevins R.A., Bardo M.T. Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 153:2000;31-43.
50. Harmer C.J., Phillips G.D. Isolation rearing enhances acquisition in a conditioned inhibition paradigm. Physiol. Behav. 65:1998;525-533.
51. Wongwitdecha N., Marsden C.A. Effects of social isolation rearing on learning in the Morris water maze. Brain Res. 715:1996;119-124.
52. Besheer J., Short K.R., Bevins R.A. Dopaminergic and cholinergic antagonism in a novel-object detection task with rats. Behav. Brain Res. 126:2001;211-217.
53. Andersen S.L., Teicher M.H. Sex differences in dopamine receptors and their relevance to ADHD. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24:2000;137-141.