Species-specific song convergence in a moving hybrid zone between two passerines

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 507-517

  Secondi, J ^a,b,e   Bretagnolle, V ^c   Compagnon, C ^d   Faivre, B ^d  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

Author keywords

Hippolais; Hybridization; Interspecific interactions; Interspecific territoriality; Parapatry

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENCE; HYBRID ZONE; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; PASSERINE; SONG;

HIPPOLAIS; HIPPOLAIS ICTERINA; HIPPOLAIS POLYGLOTTA;

EID: 0344583854     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00248.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK. 2001. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 613-622.
2. Arnold ML, Emms SK. 1998. Paradigm lost. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 379-389.
3. Baker MC, Baker Miller AE. 1990. Reproductive behavior of female buntings isolating mechanisms in a hybridizing pair of species. Evolution 44: 332-338.
4. Baker MC, Boylan JT. 1999. Singing behavior, mating associations and reproductive success in a population of hybridizing lazuli and indigo buntings. Condor 101: 493-504.
5. Barton NH, Hewitt GM. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 16: 113-148.
6. Bleeker W, Hurka H. 2001. Introgressive introgression in Rorippa (Brassicae): gene flow and its consequence in natural and anthropogenic habitats. Molecular Ecology 10: 2012-2022.
7. Dasmahapatra KK, Blum MJ, Aiello A, Hackwell S, Davies N, Bermingham EP, Mallet J. 2002. Inferences from a rapidly moving hybrid zone. Evolution 56: 741-753.
8. Britch SC, Cain ML, Howard DJ. 2001. Spatio-temporal dynamics of the Allonemobius fasciatus - A. socius hybrid zone: a 14-year old perspective. Molecular Ecology 10: 627-638.
9. Butlin R. 1998. What do hybrid zones in general, and the Chortippus parallelus zone in particular, tell us about speciation? In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless forms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 367-378.
10. Cain ML, Andreasen V, Howard DJ. 1999. Reinforcing selection is effective under a relatively broad set of conditions in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 53: 1343-1453.
11. Carney SE, Gardner KA, Rieseberg LH. 2000. Evolutionary changes over fifty-year history of a hybrid population of sunflowers (Helianthus). Evolution 54: 462-474.
12. Catchpole CK, Leisler B. 1986. Interspecific territorialism in Reed warblers: a local effect revealed by playback experiments. Animal Behaviour 34: 299-300.
13. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 1995. Bird song biology: themes and variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Cody ML. 1973. Character convergence. Annual Review of Systematics and Ecology 4: 189-211.
15. Coyne J. 1992. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355: 511-515.
16. Cramp S. 1992. Handbook of birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, Vol. 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Dukes JS, Mooney HA. 1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 135-139.
18. Emlen ST, Rising JD, Thompson WL. 1975. A behavioral and morphological study of sympatry in the indigo and lazuli buntings of the great plains. Wilson Bulletin 87: 145-302.
19. Faivre B. 1993. La prédation joue-t-elle un rôle dans la régression de l'Hypolaïs ictérine Hippolais icterina? Revue D'écologie (Terre Vie) 48: 399-420.
20. Faivre B, Secondi J, Ferry C, Chastragnat L, Cézilly F. 1999. Morphological variation and the recent evolution of wing length in the icterine warbler: a case of unidirectional introgression? Journal of Avian Biology 30: 152-158.
21. Feßl B, Hoi H. 2000. Song complexity and song structure in the Moustached warbler Acrocephalus melanopogon. Journal of Avian Biology 31: 144-150.
22. Ferry C, Deschaintre A. 1974. Le chant, signal interspécifique chez Hippolais icterina et H. polyglotta. Alauda 17: 289-312.
23. Gill FB. 1997. Local cytonuclear extinction of the golden-winged warbler. Evolution 51: 519-525.
24. Gill FB, Murray BG. 1972. Discrimination behavior and hybridization of the blue-winged and golden-winged warblers. Evolution 26: 282-293.
25. Gleason JM, Ritchie MG. 1998. Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni species complex: do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution 52: 1193-1200.
26. Good TP, Ellis JC, Annett CA, Pierotti R. 2000. Bounded hybrid superiority in an avian hybrid zone: effects of mate, diet and habitat choice. Evolution 54: 1774-1783.
27. Grant PR, Grant BR. 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256: 193-197.
28. Grant BR, Grant PR. 1996. Cultural inheritance of song and its role in the evolution of Darwin's finch. Evolution 50: 2471-2487.
29. Grant PR, Grant BR. 1997a. Hybridization, sexual imprinting and mate choice. American Naturalist 149: 1-28.
30. Grant PR, Grant BR. 1997b. Mating patterns of Darwin's finch hybrids determined by song and morphology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 317-343.
31. Harrison RG. 1993. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Helb HW, Dowsett-Lemaire F, Bergmann HH, Conrads K. 1985. Mixed singing in European birds - a review. Zeistschrift Tierpsychologie 69: 27-41.
33. Helbig AJ, Seibold I. 1999. Molecular phylogeny of Palearctic-African Acrocephalus and Hippolais warblers (Aves: Sylviidae). Molecular Phylogenetic Evolution 11: 246-260.
34. Hewitt GM. 1988. Hybrid zones - natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 3: 158-167.
35. Hostert EE. 1997. Reinforcement: a new perspective on an old controversy. Evolution 51: 697-702.
36. Howard DJ. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Harrison RG, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 46-69.
37. Johnson KP. 1999. The evolution of bill coloration and plumage dimorphism - the transference hypothesis in dabbling ducks. Behavioral Ecology 10: 63-67.
38. Jouard H. 1935. Sur la distribution en France des deux espèces d'Hypolaïs, et sur quelques-uns des caractères propres à les faire distinguer sûrement. Alauda 7: 85-99.
39. Liou LW, Price TD. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48: 1451-1459.
40. Mann NI, Slater PJB, Eales LA, Richards C. 1991. The influence of visual stimuli on song tutor choice in the zebra finch, Taenopygia guttata. Animal Behaviour 42: 285-293.
41. McCracken K, Sheldon F. 1997. Avian vocalizations and the phylogenetic signal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94: 3833-3836.
42. Miller DE. 1982. Character and variance shift in acoustic signals of birds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, eds. Acoustic communication in birds. New York: Academic Press, 253-291.
43. Moore WS. 1987. Random mating in the northern flicker hybrid zone: implications for the evolution of bright and contrasting plumage patterns in birds. Evolution 41: 539-546.
44. Mousseau TA, Howard DJ. 1998. Genetic variation in cricket calling song across a hybrid zone between two sibling species. Evolution 52: 1104-1110.
45. Pearson SF. 2000. Behavioral asymmetries in a moving hybrid zone. Behavioral Ecology 11: 84-92.
46. Peterson AT, Soberón J, Sánchez-Cordero V. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary times. Science 285: 1265-1267.
47. Reed TM. 1982. Interspecific territoriality in the Chaffinch and Great Tit on islands and the mainland of Scotland: playback and removal experiments. Animal Behaviour 30: 171-181.
48. Rhymer JM, Simberloff D. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annual Review of Systematics and Ecology 27: 83-109.
49. Rice JC. 1978. Behavioural interactions of interspecifically territorial vireos. I. Song discrimination and natural interactions. Animal Behaviour 26: 527-549.
50. Robbing MB, Braun MJ, Tobey EA. 1986. Morphological and vocal variation across a contact zone between the chickadees Parus atricapillus and P.carolinensis. Auk 103: 655-666.
51. Robinson SK, Terborgh J. 1995. Interspecific aggression and habitat selection by Amazonian birds. Journal of Animal Ecology 64: 1-11.
52. Rohwer SA. 1973. Significance of sympatry to behavior and evolution of great plain meadowlarks. Evolution 27: 44-57.
53. Rohwer S, Bermingham E, Wood C. 2001. Plumage and mitochondrial DNA haplotype variation across a moving hybrid zone. Evolution 55: 405-422.
54. Ryan MJ, Rand RS. 1998. Evoked vocal response in male túngara frogs: pre-existing biases in male responses? Animal Behaviour 56: 1509-1516.
55. Sanderson N, Szymura JM, Barton NH. 1992. Variation in mating calls across the hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads Bombina bombina and B. variegata. Evolution 46: 595-607.
56. SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Insitute Inc.
57. Secondi J, Faivre B, Kreutzer M. 1999. Maintenance of male reaction to the congeneric song in the Hippolais warbler hybrid zone. Behavioural Processes 46: 151-158.
58. Servedio MR, Kirkpatrick M. 1997. The effect of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51: 1764-1772.
59. Shapiro LH. 1998. Hybridization and geographic variation in two meadow katidid contact zones. Evolution 52: 784-796.
60. Slikas B. 1998. Recognizing and testing homology of courtship displays in storks (Ayes: Ciconiiformes: Ciconidae). Evolution 52: 884-893.
61. Wallace DIM. 1964. Field identification of Hippolais warblers. British Birds 57: 282-301.
62. Yeatman L. 1976. Atlas des oiseaux nicheurs de France. Paris: SOF.
63. Yeatman-Berthelot D, Jarry G. 1994. Nouvel atlas des oiseaux nicheurs de France. Paris: SOF, 1985-1989.