Recognizing and testing homology of courtship displays in storks (Aves: Ciconiiformes: Ciconiidae)

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 884-893

  Slikas, Beth ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Avian behavior; Behavioral evolution; Congruence; DNA DNA hybridization; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

HYBRIDIZATION; PHYLOGENY; STORK;

BIRD; COURTSHIP DISPLAY; HOMOLOGY;

AVES; CICONIIDAE; CICONIIFORMES; GALLIFORMES;

EID: 0031903782     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03713.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ARNTZEN, J. W., AND M. SPARREBOOM. 1989. A phylogeny for Old World newts, genus Triturus: biochemical and behavioral data. J. Zool. Lond. 219:645-664.
2. ATZ, J. W. 1970. The application of the idea of homology to behaviour. Pp. 53-74 in L. R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D. S. Lehrman, and J. S. Rosenblatt, eds. Development and evolution of behaviour: essays in memory of T. C. Schneirla. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
3. CARPENTER, J. M. 1989. Testing scenarios: wasp social behavior. Cladistics 5:131-144.
4. CODDINGTON, J. A. 1990. Cladistics and spider classification: araneomorph phylogeny and the monophyly of orb-weavers (Araneae: Araneomorphae, Orbiculariae). Acta Zool. Fenn. 190:75-87.
5. DE QUEIROZ, A., AND P. H. WIMBERGER. 1993. The usefulness of behaviour for phylogeny estimation: levels of homoplasy in behavioural and morphological characters. Evolution 47:46-60.
6. DESALLE, R., AND A. V. Z. BROWER. 1997. Process partitions, congruence, and the independence of characters: inferring relationships among closely related Hawaiian Drosophila from multiple gene regions. Syst. Biol. 46:751-764.
7. FOSTER, S. A., W. A. CRESKO, K. P. JOHNSON, M. U. TLUSTY, AND H. E. WILLMOT. 1996. Patterns of homoplasy in behavioral evolution. Pp. 245-269 in M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford, eds. Homoplasy. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
8. GRIFFITHS, C. S. 1994. Monophyly of the Falconiformes based on syringeal morphology. Auk 111:787-805.
9. HANCOCK, J. A., J. KUSHLAN, AND M. P. KAHL. 1992. Storks, ibises, and spoonbills of the world. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
10. IRWIN, R. E. 1996. The phylogenetic content of avian courtship display and song evolution. Pp. 234-252 in E. Martins, ed. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
11. KAHL, M. P. 1966. Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. Part 1. The marabou stork, Leptoptilos crumeniferus (Lesson). Behaviour 27:76-106.
12. _. 1971a. Social behavior and taxonomic relationships of the storks. Living Bird 10:151-170.
13. _. 1971b. Observations on the jabiru and maguari storks in Argentina, 1969. Condor 73:220-229.
14. _. 1972a. Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. Part 2. The adjutant storks, Leptoptilos dubius (Gmelin) and L. javanicus (Horsfield). Ardea 60:97-111.
15. _. 1972b. Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. The wood storks (genera Mycteria and Ibis). Ibis 114:15-29.
16. _. 1972c. Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. Part 4. The "typical" storks (genera Ciconia, Sphenorhynchus, Dissoura, and Euxenura). Z. Tierpsychol. 30:225-252.
17. _. 1972d. A revision of the family Ciconiidae (Aves). J. Zool. (Lond.) 167:451-461.
18. _. 1972e. Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. Part 5. The openbill storks (genus Anastomus). J. Ornithol. 113:121-137.
19. _. 1973. Comparative ethology of the Ciconiidae. Part 6. The blacknecked, saddlebill, and jabiru storks (genera Xenorhynchus, Ephippiorhynchus, and Jabiru). Condor 75:17-27.
20. KEMP, A. C. 1995. Aspects of the breeding biology and behavior of the secretarybird Sagittarius serpentarius near Pretoria, South Africa. Ostrich 66:61-68.
21. KENNEDY, M., H. G. SPENCER, AND R. D. GRAY. 1996. Hop, step, and gape: do the social displays of the Pelicaniformes reflect phylogeny? Anim. Behav. 51:273-291.
22. KRAJEWSKI, C., AND J. W. FETZNER, JR. 1994. Phylogeny of cranes (Gruiformes: Gruidae) based on cytochrome b sequences. Auk 111:351-365.
23. LANYON, S. M., AND J. G. HALL. 1994. Reexamination of barbet monophyly using mtDNA sequence data. Auk 111:389-397.
24. LIGON, J. D. 1967. Relationships of the cathartid vultures. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology of Univ. of Michigan, no. 651.
25. LORENZ, K. Z. 1941. Vergleichende Bewegungsstudien an Anatinen. J. Ornithol. 89:194-294.
26. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade. Vers. 3. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
27. McKITRICK, M. C. 1992. Phylogenetic analysis of avian parental care. Auk 109:828-846.
28. _. 1994. On homology and the ontological relationship of parts. Syst. Biol. 43:1-10.
29. OLSON, S. L. 1979. Multiple origins of the Ciconiiformes. Proc. Colonial Waterbird Group 1978:165-170.
30. PAPAJ, D. R. 1993. Afterword: Learning, adaptation, and the lessons of O. Pp. 374-386 in D. R. Papaj and A. C. Lewis, eds. Insect learning: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Chapman and Hall. New York.
31. PATERSON, A. M., R. D. GRAY, AND G. P. WALLIS. 1995. Penguins, petrels, and parsimony: does cladistic analysis of behavior reflect seabird phylogeny? Evolution 49:974-989.
32. PATTERSON, C. 1988. Homology in classical and molecular biology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:603-625.
33. PAYNE, R. B. 1986. Bird songs and avian systematics. Curr. Ornithol. 3:87-126.
34. POWELL, J. R. 1991. Monophyly/paraphyly/polyphyly and gene/ species trees: an example from Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8: 892-896.
35. PRUM, R. O. 1990. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of display behaviour in the neotropical manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Ethology 84:202-231.
36. REMANE, A. 1952. Die Grundlagen des Natürlichen Systems der Vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Geest und Portig K.G., Leipzig, Germany.
37. SANDERSON, M. J., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43:1781-1795.
38. SEIBOLD, I., AND A. J. HELBIG. 1995. Evolutionary history of New and Old World vultures inferred from nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Philo. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 350:163-178.
39. SHELDON, F. H. 1994. Advances in the theory and practice of DNA-hybridization as a systematic method. Pp. 284-297 in B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, eds. Molecular approaches to ecology and evolution. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
40. SHELDON, F. H., AND D. W. WINKLER. 1993. Intergeneric phylogenetic relationships of swallows measured by DNA-DNA hybridization. Auk 110:798-824.
41. SIBLEY, C. G., AND J. A. AHLQUIST. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
42. SLIKAS, B. 1997. Phylogeny of the avian family Ciconiidae (storks) based on cytochrome b sequences and DNA-DNA hybridization distances. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:275-300.
43. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP; phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Vers. 3.1.1, Illinois Natural History Survey. Champaign, IL.
44. TINBERGEN, N. 1951. The study of instinct. Clarendon, Oxford.
45. _. 1952. "Derived" activities: their causation, biological significance, origin, and emancipation during evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 27:1-32.
46. _. 1953. The herring gull's world. Collins, London.
47. _. 1959. Comparative studies of the behaviour of gulls (Laridae): a progress report. Behaviour 15:1-70.
48. VAN TETS, G. F. 1965. A comparative study of some social communication patterns in the Pelicaniformes. Ornithol. Monogra. 2:1-88.
49. WENZEL, J. W. 1992. Behavioral homology and phylogeny. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:261-281.
50. _. 1993. Application of the biogenetic law to behavioral ontogeny: a test using nest architecture in paper wasps. J. Evol. Biol. 6:229-247.
51. WOOD, D. S. 1984. Concordance between classifications of the Ciconiidae based on behavioral and morphological data. J. Ornithol. 125:25-37.