Motion, speed, and other ideas that "should be put in books"

Journal of Mathematical Behavior

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 465-477

  Schorr, Roberta Y ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Graphical representations; Graphs; Motion; Speed; Velocity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344513351     PISSN: 07323123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ainley J. Transparency in graphs and graphing tasks: an iterative design process Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19 2000 365-384
2. Carraher, D., Schliemann, A., & Nevirovsky, R., (1995). Graphing from everyday experience. Hands on. 10(2) (http://www.terc.edu/handson/f95/graphing.html). Terc, Mass.
3. Cobb, P., Wood T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, E. (1993). Mathematics as procedural instructions and mathematics as meaningful activity: the reality of teaching for understanding. In: R. B. Davis, & C. A. Maher (Eds.), Schools, mathematics, and the world of reality (pp. 119-133). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Davis, R. B. (1984). Learning mathematics: the cognitive science approach to mathematics education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
5. Davis, R. B., & Maher, C. A. (1997). How students think: the role of representations. In: L. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 93-115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence E. Erlbaum Associates.
6. Goldsmith, L. T., & Schifter, D. (1993). Characteristics of a model for the development of mathematics teaching. Reports and papers in progress. Newton, MA: Center for Learning, Teaching & Technology, Education Development Center.
7. Kaput, J. J. (1994). Democratizing access to calculus: new routes to old roots. In: A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 77-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Kaput, J. J., & Roschelle, J. (1997). Deepening the impact of technology. Beyond assistance with traditional formalisms in order to democratize access to ideas underlying calculus. In: E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lahti, Finland, July 14-19 (Vol. 1, pp. 105-112). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki.
9. Leinhardt G. Zaslavsky O. Stein M. Functions, graphs, and graphing: tasks, learning, and teaching Review of Educational Research 601 1990 1-64
10. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2000). Beyond constructivism: a models and modeling perspective on teaching, learning, and problem solving in mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change. In: A. E. Kelly, & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 665-708). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence E. Erlbaum Associates.
12. Maher, C. A. (1998). Kommunikation och konstruktivistisk undervisning [Communication and constructivist teaching]. In: A. Engrstom (Red.), Matematik och reflektion (pp. 124-143). Lund, Sweden: Studenlitteratur.
13. Monk S. Nemirovsky R. The case of Dan: student construction of a functional situation through visual attributes Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education 4 1994 139-168
14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
15. Nemirovsky, R., & Monk, S. (2000). "If you look at it the other way ..." an exploration into the nature of symbolizing. In: P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms (pp. 177-221). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Nobel T. Nemirovsky R. Wright T. Tierney C. Experiencing change: the mathematics of change in multiple environments Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 321 2001 85-108
17. Roschelle, J. (1999). Choosing and using video equipment for data collection. In: R. A. Lesh, & A. E. Kelley (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 709-732). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence E. Erlbaum Associates.
18. Schorr R.Y. Impact at the student level Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19 2000 209-231
19. Schorr, R. Y. & Lesh, R. (2003). A models and modeling perspective on classroom-based teacher development. In: R. Lesh, & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: a models and modeling perspective on teaching, learning, and problem solving in mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Sherin B.L. How students invent representations of motion: a genetic account Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19 2000 399-443
21. Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In: G. Harel, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 181-234). Albany, NY: SUNY Press
22. Wright T. Karen in motion: the role of physical enactment in developing an understanding of distance, time and speed Journal of Mathematical Behavior 20 2001 145-162