Des indices de robustesse pour la méthode prudente et pour la fonction de choix de borda

Journal of Decision Systems

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 269-288

  Durand, Sylvain ^a   Trentesaux, Damien ^b  

^a Institut IMAG   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE VALENCIENNES   (France)

Author keywords

Borda ranking rule; Maximin; Prudence; Robustness; Stability; Weights

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344339482     PISSN: 12460125     EISSN: 21167052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/12460125.2000.9736713     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ARROW, K., and RAYNAUD, H., 1986. Social choice and multicriterion decision-making, Cambridge:MIT Press.
2. BANA E COSTA, C., 1988. A methodology for sensitivity analysis in three-criteria problems:A case study in municipal management. European Journal of Operational Research, 33:159–173.
3. BLACK, D., 1958. The Theory of committees and elections, Cambridge University Press.
4. BOUYSSOU, D., and PIRLOT, M., 1996. Choosing and ranking on the basis of fuzzy preference relations with the "min in favor'', ESSEC. rapport de recherche
5. BRANS, J. P., and VINKE, P., 1985. A preference ranking organization method:the PROMETHEE method. Management Science, 31:647–656.
6. DYER, J., FISHBURN, P., STEUER, R., WALLENIUS, J., and ZIONTS, S., 1992. Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory:The next ten years. Management Science, 38:645–654.
7. FRENCH, S., 1992. Mathematical Programming Approaches to Sensitivity Calculations in Decision Analysis. Journal of Operational Research Society, 43 (8):813–819.
8. GAL, T., and WOLF, K., 1986. Stability in vector maximization–A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 25:169–182.
9. KÖHLER, G., 1978. Choix multicritère et analyse algébrique des données ordinales, Université Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble. Thèse de troisième cycle
10. MARCHANT, T., 1996. Valued Relations Aggregation with the Borda Method. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 5:127–132.
11. MARESCHAL, B., 1988. Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research, 33:54–64.
12. MOUSSEAU, V., 1993. Problèmes liés à l’évaluation de l’importance relative des critères en aide multicritère à la décision:Réflexions théoriques, expérimentations et implémentation informatique, Université de Paris-Dauphine. Thèse de troisième cycle
13. PEREZ, J., and BARBA-ROMERO, S., 1995. Three practical criteria of comparison among ordinal preference aggregating rules. European Journal of Operational Research, 85:473–487.
14. RIOS INSUA, D., and FRENCH, S., 1991. A framework for sensitivity analysis in discrete multiobjective decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 54:176–190.
15. ROY, B., and VANDERPOOTEN, D., 1996. The European School of MCDA:Emergence, Basic Feature and Current Work. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 5:22–38.
16. ROY, B., 1997. “ Un chaînon manquant en RO-AD:Les conclusions robustes ”. In Cahiers du LAMSADE Vol. 144
17. STEWART, T., 1996. Robustness of Additive Value Function Methods in MCDM. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 5:301–309.
18. YOUNG, H. P., 1977. Extending Condorcet’s rule. Journal of Economic Theory, 16:335–353.