Valued relations aggregation with the borda method

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 127-132

  Marchant, Thierry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Borda; Characterization; PROMETHEE; Valued relation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013301561     PISSN: 10579214     EISSN: 10991360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199606)5:2<127::AID-MCDA96>3.0.CO;2-A     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bouyssou, D., ‘Ranking methods based on valued preference relations: a characterization of the net flow method’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 60, 61-67(1992).
2. Bouyssou, D., ‘Les relations de surclassement ont-elles des propriétés remarquables?', Working Paper CERESSEC DR 93032, ESSEC, Cergy, 1993.
3. Bouyssou, D., ‘Outranking relations: do they have special properties?', J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal., 4, (1995).
4. Brans, J. P., and Mareschal, B., ‘The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid’, Decis. Support Syst., 12, 297-310(1994).
5. Debord, B., ‘Axiomatisation de procédures d’agrégation de préférences’, Doctoral Thesis, Université Scientifique Technologique et Médicale de Grenoble, 1987.
6. Hansson, B., and Sahlquist, H., ‘A proof technique for social choice with variable electorate’, J. Econ. Theory, 13, 193-200(1976).
7. Nitzan, S., and Rubinstein, A., ‘A further characterization of Borda ranking method’, Public Choice, 36, 153-158(1981).
8. Roberts, F. S., Measurement Theory, Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley, 1979.
9. Roubens, M., and Vincke, Ph., Preference Modelling, Berlin:Springer, 1985.
10. Young, H. P., ‘An axiomatization of Borda’s rule’, J. Econ. Theory, 9, 43-52(1974).