Coteaching for Content Understanding: A Schoolwide Model

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 315-347

  Morocco, Catherine Cobb ^a   Aguilar, Cynthia Mata ^a  

^a EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344198056     PISSN: 10474412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532768xjepc1304_04     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aguilar, C. M., & Morocco, C. C. (2000, Summer). Beacons of Excellence shines a light on inclusive schools that work. Mosaic: An EDC Report Series, 9-10.
2. Alexander, W. M., & George, P. S. (1981). The exemplary middle school. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3. Allen, D., Blythe, T., & Powell, B. S. (1996). A guide to looking collaboratively at student work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project Zero.
4. Arhar, J. M. (1992). Interdisciplinary teaming and the social bonding of middle level students. In J. L. Irvin (Ed.), Transforming middle level education: Perspectives and possibilities (pp. 139-161). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Bauwens, J., & Hourcade, J. J. (1995). Cooperative teaching: Rebuilding the schoolhouse for all students. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
6. Bauwens, J., Hourcade, J., J., & Friend, M. (1989). Cooperative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 17-22.
7. Boudah, D., Schumaker, J., & Deshler, D. (1997). Collaborative instruction: Is it an effective option for inclusion in secondary classrooms? Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 20, 293-316.
8. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the twenty-first century (The report of the task force on education of young adolescents). New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
9. Clifford, J. (1990). Notes on (field) notes. In R. Sanjek (Ed.), Fieldnotes: The making of anthropology (pp. 47-71). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10. Coben, S. S., Thomas, C. C., Sattler, R. O., & Morsink, C. V. (1997). Meeting the challenge of consultation and collaboration: Developing interactive teams. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 427-432.
11. Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Coteaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28, 1-16.
12. Dieker, L. A. (2001). What are the characteristics of "effective" middle and high school co-taught teams for students with disabilities? Preventing School Failure, 46(1), 14-23.
13. DiGisi, L. (1999). All students in supported inquiry-based science with technology (ASSIST), the action reflection process: Building teacher practice through looking at student work. Newton, MA: Education Development Center.
14. Donaldson, G. (2001). Cultivating leadership in schools: Connecting people, purpose, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Elmore, R. (2000, Winter). Building a new structure, for school leadership. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
16. Fennick, E. (2001). Coteaching: An inclusive curriculum for transition. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 33, 60-67.
17. Fennick, E., & Liddy, D. (2001). Responsibilities and preparation for collaborative teaching: Co- teachers' perspectives. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 229-240.
18. Field, S., LeRoy, B., & Rivera, S. (1994). Meeting functional curriculum needs in middle school general education classrooms. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 26, 40-43.
19. Gable, R. A., Hendrickson, J. M., & Rogan, J. P. (1996). TEAMS supporting students at risk in the regular classroom: Teacher educational assistance for middle school students. Clearing House, 69, 235-239.
20. Gable, R A., & Manning, M. L. (1997). In the midst of reform: The changing structure and practice of middle school education. Clearing House, 71, 58-62.
21. Glatthorn, A. A. (1990). Cooperative professional development: Facilitating the growth of the special education teacher and the classroom teacher. Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 11(3), 29-34.
22. Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters. Thinking K-16 2(3). A Publication of the Education Trust, 5(2), 1-14.
23. Haycock, K., Jerald, C., Huang, S. (2001). Closing the gap: Done in a decade. Thinking K-16. A Publication of the Education Trust, 5(2), 3-21.
24. Hobbs, T., & Westling, D. L. (1998). Promoting successful inclusion through collaborative problem-solving. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 31, 12-19.
25. Howell,P. (1991). Taking AIM to assist middle school students with special needs. Preventing School Failure, 35, 43-47.
26. Janney,R.E., Snell,M. E., Beers, M. K., & Raynes, M. (1995). Integrating students with moderate and severe disabilities into general education classes. Exceptional Children, 61, 423-439.
27. Jorgensen, C. M. (1995). Essential questions - inclusive answers. Educational Leadership, 52, 52-55.
28. Kirk, J., & Miller, M. (1986). Reliability, validity and qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Analyzing and interpreting ethnographic data: Ethnographer's toolkit. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
30. Legters, N. E. (1999). Teacher collaboration in restructuring urban high school (Report No. 36). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
31. Lipsitz, J., Mizell, H. M., Jackson, A. W., & Austin, L. M. (1997). Speaking with one voice: A manifesto for middle-grades reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 533-540.
32. Lipsky, D. K. (1994). National survey gives insight to inclusive movement. Inclusive Education Programs, 1, 4-7.
33. Little, T. S., & Dacus, N. B. (1999). Looping: Moving up with the class. Educational Leadership, 57, 42-45.
34. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, K. (1996). Teacher's professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757-798.
35. Maclver, D. J., & Epstein, J. L. (1991). Responsive practices in the middle grades: Teacher teams, advisory groups, remedial instruction, and school transition programs. American Journal of Education, 99, 587-622.
36. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Morocco, C. C., Clark-Chiarelli, M., Aguilar, C. M., & Brigham, N. (2002). Cultures of excellence and belonging in urban middle schools. Research in Middle Level Education On-Line, 25(2). Retrieved August 20, 2002, from http://www.nmsa.org/research/rmle/rmle/article4
38. Morocco, C. C., & Solomon, M. Z. (1999). Revitalizing professional development. In M. Z. Solomon (Ed.), The diagnostic teacher: Constructing new approaches to professional development (pp. 247-267). New York: Teachers College Press.
39. Murawski, W. W., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of coteaching research: Where are the data? Remedial and Special Education, 22, 258-267.
40. Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators. WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring Schools.
41. Palincsar, A. S., & Collins, K. M. (in press). Learning skills. In T. Husen & N. Postlewaite (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education: Research Studies, Vol. 2. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
42. Patton, M. Q. (1987). Qualitative evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Redditt, S. (1991). Two teachers working as one. Equity and Choice, 8(1), 49-56.
44. Rice, D., & Zigmond, N. (2000). Coteaching in secondary schools: Teacher reports of developments in Australian and American classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 190-197.
45. Schensul, J. J., LeCompte, M. D., Nastasi, B. K., & Borgatti, S. P. (1999). Enhanced ethnographic methods: Audiovisual techniques, focused group interviews, and elicitation techniques. Ethnographer's toolkit. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
46. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21.
47. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48. Swiderek, B. (1997). Full inclusion - making it work. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 41, 234-235.
49. Tanner, C. K. (1996). Inclusive education in the United States: Beliefs and practices among middle school principals and teachers. Educational Policy Archives, 4, 1-30.
50. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Arguelles, M. E. (1997). The ABCDEs of coteaching. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 30(2), 1-10.
51. Voss, J. F., Wiley, J., & Carretero, M. (1995). Acquiring intellectual skills. Annual Review of 'Psychology, 46, 155-181.
52. Walther-Thomas, C. S. (1997). Coteaching experiences: The benefits and problems that teachers and principals report over time. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 395-407.
53. Walther-Thomas, C. S., Bryant, M., & Land, S. (1996). Planning for effective coteaching. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 255-264.
54. Wasser, J. D., & Bressler, L. (1996). Working in the interpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5-15.
55. Weiss, M. P., & Brigham, F. J. (2000). Coteaching and the model of shared responsibility: What does the research support? In T. E. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Educational interventions: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities, Vol. 34 (pp. 217-245). Stamford, CT: JAI.
56. White, A. E., & White, L. L. (1992). A collaborative model for children with mild disabilities in middle schools. Focus on Exceptional Children, 24, 1-10.
57. Zigmond, N. (2001). Special education at the crossroads. Preventing School Failure, 45, 70-74.
58. Zigmond,N., & Magiera,K. (2001). A focus on coteaching: Use caution. Current Practice Alerts, 5. Retrieved August 20, 2002, from http://www.didcec.org/alerts/
59. Zorfass, J. M. (1999). Professional development through interdisciplinary curriculum design. In M. Z. Solomon (Ed.), The diagnostic teacher. Constructing new approaches to professional development (pp. 201-230). New York: Teachers College Press.