Method for identification of interfering signals in EPR dating of tooth enamel

Radiation Measurements

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 781-785

  Hayes, Robert B ^a   Haskell, Edwin H ^b  

^a Westinghouse Govt Services Group   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOSIMETRY; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; GEOCHRONOLOGY; IRRADIATION; SIGNAL INTERFERENCE;

FOSSIL TOOTH ENAMEL; SPECTRAL RESOLUTION;

TOOTH ENAMEL;

EID: 0343878069     PISSN: 13504487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00108-6     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. 2- to the ESR spectrum near g=2 of powdered human tooth enamel. Calcif. Tissue Int. 41:1987;124-129.
2. Grün R. Dose determination on fossil tooth enamel using ESR spectrum deconvolution with Gaussian and Lorentzian peak shapes. Ancient TL. 16:1998;51-55.
3. Grün R. Reproducibility measurements for ESR signal intensity and dose determination: high precision but doubtful accuracy. Radiat. Meas. 29:1998;177-193.
4. Grün R., Clapp R. An automated sample changer for Bruker ESR spectrometers. Ancient TL. 14:1996;1-5.
5. Haskell E.H., Hayes R.B., Kenner G.H. A high sensitivity EPR technique for alanine dosimetry. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 77:1998;43-49.
6. Hayes, R.B., 1999. Electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry: methodology and material characterization. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
7. Hayes, R.B., Haskell, E.H., Barrus, J.K., Kenner, G.H. Romanyukha, A.A., 2000. Accurate EPR radiosensitivity calibration using small sample masses. Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A., 441, 535-550.
8. Jonas, M., 1997. Electron spin resonance dating and dosimetry of tooth enamel. Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
9. Jonas M., Grün R. Q-band ESR studies of fossil tooth enamel: implications for spectrum deconvolution and dating. Radiat. Meas. 27:1997;49-58.
10. Jonas M., Marseglia. The case for the use of integrated spectrum deconvolution in ESR dating - a numerically generated example. Radiat. Meas. 27:1997;359-364.
11. Lyons R.G. The difference in integrating. . Radiat. Meas. 27:1997;345-350.
12. Sholom S.V., Haskell E.H., Hayes R.B., Kenner G.H., Chumak V.V. Influence of crushing and additive irradiation procedures on EPR of tooth enamel. Radiat. Meas. 29:1998;105-111.
13. Vanhaelewyn, G., Callens, F., Grün, R., 2000. EPR spectrum deconvolution and dose assessment of fossil tooth enamel using maximum likelihood common factor analysis. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 52, 1317-1326.