An evaluation of methods for single-trial estimation of P3 latency

Psychophysiology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 153-162

  Jaškowski, Piotr ^a   Verleger, Rolf ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

^b PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cross covariance; Event related potential; Maximum likelihood; P3(00); Simulations; Single trial estimation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIMULATION; TECHNIQUE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0343550520     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.3720153     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Demiralp, T., Ademoǧlu, A., Schürmann, M., Başar-Eroǧlu, C., Basar, E. (1999). Detection of P300 waves in single trials by the wavelet transform (WT). Brain and Language, 66, 108-128.
2. Donchin, E., Ritter, W., McCallum, W. C. (1978). Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP. In E. Callaway, P. Tueting, S. H. Koslow (Eds.), Event-related brain potentials in man (pp. 349-411). New York: Academic Press.
3. Falkenstein, M., Koshlykova, N. A., Kiroj, V. N., Hoormann, J., Hohnsbein, J. (1995). Late ERP components in visual and auditory go/nogo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96, 36-43.
4. Fein, G., Turetsky, B. (1989). P300 latency variability in normal elderly: Effects of paradigm and measurement technique. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 384-394.
5. Fisher, R. A. (1925). Theory of statistical estimation. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 22, 700-725.
6. Ford, J. M., White, P., Lim, K. O., Pfefferbaum, A. (1994). Schizophrenics have fewer and smaller P300s: A single-trial analysis. Biological Psychiatry, 35, 96-103.
7. Gasser, T., Möcks, J., Verleger, R. (1983). Selavco: A method to deal with trial-to-trial variability of evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 717-723.
8. Gratton, G., Kramer, A. F., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E. (1989). Simulation studies of latency measures of components of the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology, 26, 233-248.
9. Haig, A. R., Gordon, E., Glynn, R., Anderson, J. (1995). Classification of single trial ERP sub-types: Application of globally optimal vector quantization using simulated annealing. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 288-297.
10. Hohnsbein, J., Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. I. Simple and choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 7, 438-446.
11. Jaśkowski, P., Verleger, R. (1999). Amplitudes and latencies of single-trial ERP estimated by a maximum likelihood method. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46, 987-993.
12. Kolev, V., Demiralp, T., Yordanova, J., Ademoǧlu, A., Isoǧlu-Alkaç, Ü. (1997). Time-frequency analysis reveals multiple functional components during oddball P300. NeuroReport, 8, 2061-2065.
13. Lange, D. H., Pratt, H., Inbar, G. F. (1997). Modeling and estimation of single evoked brain potential components. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 44, 791-799.
14. Leuthold, H., Sommer, W. (1998). Post-perceptual effects and P300 latency. Psychophysiology, 35, 34-46.
15. Matt, J., Leuthold, H., Sommer, W. (1992). Differential effects of voluntary expectancies on reaction times and event-related potentials: Evidence for automatic and controlled expectancies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 810-822.
16. Michalewski, H. J., Prasher, D. K., Starr, A. (1986). Latency variability and temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potentials (N1, P2, N2, and P3) in normal subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 65, 59-71.
17. Möcks, J., Gasser, T., Pham, D. T. (1984). Variability of single visual evoked potentials evaluated by two new statistical tests. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 57, 571-580.
18. Möcks, J., Köhler, W., Gasser, T., Pham, D. T. (1988). Novel approaches to the problem of latency jitter. Psychophysiology, 25, 217-226.
19. Pfefferbaum, A., Christensen, C., Ford, J. M., Kopell, B. S. (1986). Apparent response incompatibility effects on P3 latency depend on the task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 64, 424-437.
20. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Johnson, R., Jr., Wenegrat, B. G., Kopell, B. S. (1983). Manipulation of P3 latency: Speed vs. accuracy instructions. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 188-197.
21. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Wenegrat, B. G., Roth, W. T., Kopell, B. S. (1984). Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. I. Normal aging. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 59, 85-103.
22. Pham, D. T., Möcks, J., Köhler, W., Gasser, T. (1987). Variable latencies of noisy signals: Estimation and testing in brain potential data. Biometrika, 74, 525-533.
23. Puce, A., Berkovic, S. F., Cadusch, P. J., Bladin, P. F. (1994a). P3 latency jitter assessed using 2 techniques. I. Simulated data and surface recordings in normal subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 352-364.
24. Puce, A., Berkovic, S. F., Cadusch, P. J., Bladin, P. F. (1994b). P3 latency jitter assessed using 2 techniques. II. Surface and sphenoidal recordings in subjects with focal epilepsy. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 555-567.
25. Smulders, F. T. Y., Kenemans, J. L., Kok, A. (1994). A comparison of different methods for estimating single-trial latencies. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 107-114.
26. Squires, K. C., Wickens, C., Squires, N. K., Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science, 193, 1142-1146.
27. Tomberg, C. (1995). New application of the Z estimator to identify the cognitive P300 in non-averaged human brain potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 184, 153-156.
28. Unsal, A., Segalowitz, S. J. (1995). Sources of P300 attenuation after head injury: Single-trial amplitude, latency jitter, and EEG power. Psychophysiology, 32, 249-256.
29. Verleger, R. (1987). Sequential effects on P3 in a counting task: A partial replication. Biological Psychology, 25, 221-246.
30. Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131-156.
31. Verleger, R., Lefèbre, C., Wieschemeyer, R., Kömpf, D. (1997). Event-related potentials suggest slowing of brain processes in generalized epilepsy and alterations of visual processing in patients with partial seizures. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 205-219.
32. Verleger, R., Wascher, E. (1995). Fitting ex-Gauss functions to P3 wave-shapes: An attempt at distinguishing between real and apparent changes of P3 latency. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 146-158.
33. Woody, C. D. (1967). Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals. Medical and Biological Engineering, 5, 539-553.