American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase III. Measurement of image quality differences at varying levels of data compression

European Heart Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 687-696

  Brennecke, R ^a   Burgel U ^a   Simon, R ^b   Rippin, G ^a   Fritsch, H P ^a   Becker, T ^b   Nissen, S E ^c  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; CARDIOLOGY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SOCIETIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0343293820     PISSN: 0195668X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1999.2102     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Simon R, Brennecke R, Hess O, Meier B, Reiner H, Zeelenberg C. Recommendations for digital imaging in angiocardiography. Eur Heart J. 15:1994;1332-1334.
2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 25:1995;800-802.
3. Pennebecker WB, Mitchell JL. JPEG Still Image Compression Standard. 1993;Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. p. 78.
4. Rigolin VH, Robiolio PA, Spero LA. Lossy JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Am J Cardiol. 78:1996;131-135.
5. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation. 96:1997;1157-1164.
6. Koning G, van Meurs BA, Haas H, Reiber JHC. Effects of data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 34:1995;175-185.
7. Koning G, Beretta P, Zwart P, Hekking E, Reiber JHC. Effect of lossy data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. Int J Card Imaging. 13:1997;261-270.
8. Kirkeeide R, Beretta P, Smalling RW, Anderson HV, Schroth G, Gould KL. Diagnostic content is unaffected by 12:1 image compression (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol. 29:1997;35.
9. Fritsch JP, Negwer F, Renneisen U, Brennecke R, Meyer J. Visual and quantitative analysis of coronary angiograms after irreversible data compression (abstr). Eur Heart J. 15:1994;46.
10. Karson TH, DeFranco A, Evans DJ. Replacement of cine film by digital angiography: clinical evaluation of a real-time optical storage system (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;2156A.
11. Silber S, Dörr R, Zindler G, Mühling H, Diebel T. Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms. Int J Cardiol. 60:1997;195-200.
12. Robinson PJA. Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image. Br J Radiol. 70:1997;1085-1098.
13. Tuinenburg JC, Koning G, Hekking. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographia data compression phase II: the effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in coronary angiography. Eur Heart J. 21:2000;679-686.
14. Kerensky RA, Cusma J, Kubilis P. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase I: the effects of lossy data compression of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography. Eur Heart J. 21:2000;668-678.
15. Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR. 163:1994;463-468.
16. Chester S. Review of equivalence and hypothesis testing. Am Statistical Ass Proc Biopharmaceutical Section. 1986;177-182.
17. Ho SY, Zhu G, Zhao W. Statistical testing for equivalence. Am Statistical Ass Proc Biopharmaceutical Section. 1993;240-244.