Effect of Paced and Unpaced Practice on Skill Application and Retention: How Much is Enough?

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 769-801

  Péladeau, Normand ^a   Forget, Jacques ^b   Gagné, Françoys ^b  

^a Provalis Research   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Academic performance; Fluency; Long term retention; Mastery learning; Overlearning

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242711461     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00028312040003769     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Adams, G. L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
2. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. Amyotte, L. (1998). Méthodes quantitatives: Applications à la recherche en sciences humaines [Quantitative methods: Applications in social sciences research]. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Édition du Renouveau Pédagogique.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 18-21.
6. Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 296-308.
7. Bennett, W.J., Finn, C. E., & Cribb, J. T. E. (1999). The educated child: A parent's guide from preschool through eighth grade. New York: Free Press.
8. Berquam, E. M. (1981). The relation between frequency of response and retention on a paired associates task. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42(06), 2460A. (UMI No. 8127415)
9. Binder, C. (1993). Behavioral fluency: A new paradigm. Educational Technology, 23(10), 8-14.
10. Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163-197.
11. Binder, C., Haughton, E., & Van Eyk, D. (1990). Increasing endurance by building fluency: Precision Teaching attention span. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22, 24-27.
12. Block, J. H., & Anderson, L. W. (1975). Mastery learning in classroom instruction. New York: Macmillan.
13. Block, J. H., & Burns, R. B. (1976). Mastery learning. Review of Research in Education, 4, 3-49.
14. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Bonnett, M. (1995). Teaching thinking, and the sanctity of content. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 29, 295-309.
16. Brophy, J., & Evertson, C. (1976). Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
17. Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
18. Brown, S. A., Dunne, J. D., & Cooper, J. O. (1996). Immediate retelling's effect on student retention. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 387-407.
19. Bruce, G. S. (1999). Instructional design made easy. A workbook for designing accelerated learning programs (2nd ed.). Tucker, GA: Aubrey Daniels & Associates.
20. Bucklin, B. R., Dickinson, A. M., & Brethower, D. M. (2000). A comparison of the effects of fluency training and accuracy training on application and retention. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13, 140-163.
21. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
23. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
24. Commission d'évaluation de l'enseignement collégial. (1995). Guide spécifique pour l'évaluation des programmes d'études: Le programme de sciences humaines [Specific guide for the evaluation of programs of studies: The social sciences program]. Quebec, QC, Canada: Author.
25. Cook, T. J., & Poole, W. K. (1982). Treatment implementation and statistical power: A research note. Evaluation Review, 6, 425-431.
26. Cormier, S. M., & Hagman, J. D. (1987). Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Davies, T. P. (1972). An evaluation of computer assisted instruction using a drill and practice program. Dissertation Abstracts International, 32(12), 6970B. (UMI No. 7218627)
28. Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Stretton, K., & Hall, R. V. (1983). The peer tutoring game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 225-239.
29. Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results. American Psychologist, 43, 627-634.
30. Dougherty, K. M., & Johnson, J. M. (1996). Overlearning, fluency, and automaticity. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 289-292.
31. Driskell, J. E., Willis, R. P., & Cooper, C. (1992). Effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 615-622.
32. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885)
33. Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington.
34. Evans, S. S., & Evans, W. H. (1985). Frequencies that ensure skill competency. Journal of Precision Teaching, 6, 25-30.
35. Farr, M. J. (1987). The long-term retention of knowledge and skills: A cognitive and instructional perspective. New York: Springer.
36. Fischer, C. W., Berliner, D. C., Filby, N. N., Marlianve, R., Cahen, L. S., & Dishaw, M. M. (1980). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: An overview. In C. Denham & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Time to learn (pp. 7-32). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
37. Gagné, F., & St Père, F. (2002). When IQ is controlled, does motivation still predict achievement? Intelligence, 30, 71-100.
38. Gillingham, M. G., & Guthrie, J. T. (1987). Relationships between CBI and research on teaching. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 189-199.
39. Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (1988). Overview. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The Nature of Expertise (pp. xi-xxxvi). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
41. Greenwood, C. R., Hart, B., Walker, D., & Risley, T. (1994). The opportunity to respond and academic performance revisited: A behavioral theory of developmental retardation and its prevention. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainaito, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. W. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education (pp. 213-223). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
42. Grenon, G., & Viau, S. (1999). Méthodes quantitatives en sciences humaines [Quantitative methods in human sciences] (2nd ed.). Montréal: Gaétan Morin.
43. Guskey, T. R., & Gates, S. L. (1986). Synthesis of research on the effects of mastery learning in elementary and secondary classrooms. Educational Leadership, 43(8), 73-80.
44. Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99-136.
45. Haughton, E. (1972). Aims, growing, and sharing. In J. Jordan & L. Robbins (Eds.), Let's try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 20-39). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
46. Haughton, E. (1980). Practicing practices: Learning by activity. Journal of Precision Teaching, 1(1), 29-30.
47. Heath-Legg, A. J. (1992). The use of keyboard familiarization and basic word processing in a first-grade spelling program. Unpublished M.S. practicum, Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED348663)
48. Heward, W. L. (1994). Three "low-tech" strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainaito, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. W. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education (pp. 283-320). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
49. Hirsch, E. D. (1996). The schools we need and why we don't have them. New York: Doubleday.
50. Ivarie, J. J. (1986). Effects of proficiency rates on later performance of a recall and writing behavior. Remedial and Special Education, 7(5), 25-30.
51. Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy, numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475-1490.
52. Judd, W. A., & Glaser, R. (1969). Response latency as a function of training method, information level, acquisition, and overlearning. Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph, 60(4 Pt. 2), 1-30.
53. Kay, R. H. (1992). Understanding gender differences in computer attitudes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25, 159-171.
54. Keller, F. S. (1968). "Good-bye, teacher...." Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 78-89.
55. Kelly, R. L. (1996). A functional analysis of the effects of mastery and fluency on maintenance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(2), 639A. (UMI No. 9616720)
56. Keselman, H.J., Huberty, C.J., Lix, L. M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R. A., Donahue, B., et al. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68, 350-386.
57. Kohn, A. (1999). The schools our children deserve. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
58. Kubina, R. M., & Morrison, R. S. (2000). Fluency in education. Behavior and Social Issues, 10, 83-99.
59. Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 265-299.
60. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1987). Review of recent research literature on computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 222-230.
61. Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. L. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1979). A meta-analysis of outcome studies of Keller's Personalized System of Instruction. American Psychologist, 34, 307-318.
62. Lanchantin, S. (1991). Systematic development of an instructional module on writing topic sentences for fifth grade students. Master's thesis, New York Institute of Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED341072)
63. Lindsley, O. R. (1996). Is fluency free-operant response-response chaining? The Behavior Analyst, 19, 211-224.
64. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 1993, 48, 1181-1209.
65. Makepeace, M. D. (1998). The effect of rate vs. number of emissions of an operant behavior on behavior probability. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(4), 1835B. (UMI No. 9828812)
66. McCarty, A. L. (1999). A comparison of the effects of temporal requirement and response form on retention, equivalence and endurance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(2), 1066B. (UMI No. 9954044)
67. McDermott, P. A., & Stegemann, J. H. (1987). The comparative effects of computer-assisted instruction of motivation and achievement of learning disabled students. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED309611)
68. McFarland, R. A. (1928). The role of speed in mental ability. Psychological Bulletin, 25, 595-612.
69. McFarland, R. A. (1930). Experimental study of the relationship between speed and mental ability. Journal of General Psychology, 3, 67-96.
70. Mevarech, Z. R., Silber, O., & Fine, D. (1991). Learning with computers in small groups: Cognitive and affective outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(2), 233-243.
71. Morrison, D. E., & Henkel, R. E. (1970). The significance test controversy: A reader. Chicago: Adline.
72. Nathan, R., & Baron, L. J. (1995). The effects of gender, program type, and content on elementary children's software preferences. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27(3), 348-360.
73. Neisser, U. (1983). The rise and fall of the sensory register. The Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 6, 1-54.
74. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the power law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisitions (pp. 1-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.
76. Olander, C. P., Collins, D. L., McArthur, B. L., Watts, R. O., & McDade, C. E. (1986). Retention among college students: A comparison of traditional versus Precision Teaching. Journal of Precision Teaching, 4, 80-82.
77. Ormrod, J. E., & Spivey, N. R. (1990). Overlearning and speeded practice in spelling instruction. Psychological Reports, 67(2), 365-366.
78. Otis, A. S. (1962). Examen Otis-Ottawa pour le recrutement du personnel [Otis-Ottawa exam for personnel recruitment], Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Édition de l'Université d'Ottawa.
79. Pedego, S. E. (1999). The comparative effects of single and yoked learning channel sets under overlearning and fluency training conditions on the retention of paired associate information. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(4), 1836B. (UMI No. 9928126)
80. Péladeau, N. (2000). PracticeMill (Version 1.2) [Computer software]. Montreal: Provalis Research.
81. Peterson, L. R. (1965). Paired associate latencies after the last error. Psychonomic Sciences, 2, 167-168.
82. Reynolds, J. H., & Glaser, R. (1964). Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 297-308.
83. Rosenshine, B., & Berliner, D. C. (1978). Academic engaged time. British Journal of Teacher Education, 4(1), 3-16.
84. Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching Functions. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook on research in teaching (pp. 376-391). New York: Macmillan.
85. Rossi, P., Freeman, H., & Lipsey, M. (1999). Evaluation: A systematic approach (6th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
86. Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing for cumulative knowledge psychology: Implications for the training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
87. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
88. Semb, G. B., & Ellis, J. A. (1994). Knowledge taught in school: What is remembered? Review of Educational Research, 64, 253-286.
89. Shirley, M. J., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1994). The effects of performance criteria on learning and retention of spelling words. Journal of Precision Teaching, 12, 73-86.
90. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 175-213.
91. Smith, E. S. (1980). The effect of computer-assisted instruction on academic achievement, school daily attendance, and school library usage at Margaret Murray Washington Career Center. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(6), 2431A. (UMI No, 8026342)
92. Spearman, C. (1914). The theory of two factors. Psychological Review, 21, 101-115.
93. Stallings, J. (1975). Implementation and child effects of teaching practices in Follow Through classrooms. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(Serial No. 163).
94. Stallings, J. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9(11), 11-16.
95. Taymans, J. M. (1985). An investigation of the relationship between response latency during overlearning and retention for learning disabled students engaged in computer-assisted instruction. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(2), 503A. (UMI No. 8608867)
96. Terrill, R., & Ducharme, R. (1994). Passage secondaire-collégial: Caractéristiques étudiantes et rendement scolaire [High-school-to-college promotion: Student characteristics and academic achievement] (2nd ed.). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Service Régional d'Admission du Montréal Métropolitain.
97. Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25(2), 26-30.
98. Thompson, B. (2002). What future quantitative social science research could look like: Confidence intervals for effect sizes. Educational Researcher, 31(5), 25-32.
99. Thorndike, E. L. (1921). The Psychology of drill in arithmetic: The amount of practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 183-194.
100. Tinker, M. A. (1931). The significance of speed in test response. Psychological Review, 38, 450-454.
101. Vincent, A. T. (1977). The effects of supplementary computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics achievement and attitude toward mathematics of EMR high school students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39(2), 736A. (UMI No. 7812963)
102. Vockell, E. L., & Schwartz, E. (1988). The computer in the classroom. Santa Cruz, CA: Mitchell.
103. Weitzman, D. L. (1964). Effect of tutoring on performance and motivation ratings in secondary school students. Oakland, CA: Oakland Unified School District. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED001562)
104. White, O. R. (1985). Aim * star wars (setting aims that compete): Episode 1. Journal of Precision Teaching, 6, 7-13.
105. White, W. A. T. (1988). A meta-analysis of Direct Instruction in special education. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4), 364-374.
106. Wittman, T.-K. (1996). The relationship between automatization of multiplication facts and elementary school children's mathematics anxiety. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(1), 108A. (UMI No. 9615505)
107. Wolf, W., & Stroud, J. (1961). IQ test completion and intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 245-253.