DNA Sequence Evolution with Neighbor-Dependent Mutation

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 313-322

  Arndt, Peter F ^a,c   Burge, Christopher B ^b   Hwa, Terence ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

CpG methylation deamination; Dinucleotide frequency; DNA sequence evolution; Neighbor dependent mutation

Indexed keywords

DINUCLEOTIDE; DNA; DNA BASE; NUCLEOTIDE;

CONFERENCE PAPER; CPG ISLAND; DEAMINATION; DNA METHYLATION; DNA SEQUENCE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MODEL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION RATE; NEIGHBOR DEPENDENT MUTATION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VERTEBRATE;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DNA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0242659321     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/10665270360688039     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Arndt, P.F., and Hwa, T. 2002 In preparation.
2. Batzer, M.A., Kilroy, G.E., Richard, P.E., Shaikh, T.H., Desselle, T.D., Hoppens, C.L., and Deininger, P.L. 1990. Structure and variability of recently inserted alu family members. Nucl. Acids Res. 18, 6793.
3. ben Avraham, D., and Köhler, J. 1992 Mean-field (n,m)-cluster approximation for lattice models. Physical Rev. 45, 8358.
4. Coulondre, C., Miller, J.H., Farabaugh, P.J., and Gilbert, W. 1978. Molecular basis of base substitution hotspots in E. coli. Nature 274, 775.
5. Fryxell, K.J., and Zuckerkandl, E. 2000. Cytosine deamination plays a primary role in the evolution of mammalian isochores. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1371.
6. Gardiner, C.W. 1996. Handbook of Stochastic Methods, Springer, New York.
7. Gojobori, T., Li, W.-H., and Graur, D. 1982. Patterns of nucleotide substitution in pseudogenes and functional genes. J. Mol. Evol. 18, 360.
8. Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., and Yano, T. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22, 160.
9. Hess, S.T., Blake, J.D., and Blake, R.D. 1994. Wide variations in neighbor-dependent substitution rates. J. Mol. Biol. 236, 1022.
10. Karlin, S., and Burge, C. 1995. Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: A genomic signature. Trends Genet. 11, 283.
11. Karlin, S., and Mrázek, J. 1997. Compositional differences within and between eukaryotic genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 10227.
12. Karlin, S., Mrázek, J., and Campbell, A.M. 1997. Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications. J. Bact. 179, 775.
13. Li, W.-H., Wu, C.I., and Luo, C.C. 1984. Nonrandomness of point mutation as reflected in nucleotide substitutions in pseudogenes and its evolutionary implications. J. Mol. Evol. 21, 58.
14. Neyman, J. 1971. In S.S. Gupta and J. Yackel, eds., Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics, Academic Press, New York.
15. Petrov, D.A., and Hartl, D.L. 1999. Patterns of nucleotide substitution in drosophila and mammalian genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1475.
16. Razin, A., and Riggs, A.D. 1980. DNA methylation and gene function. Science 210, 604.
17. Russell, G.J., and Subak-Sharpe, J.H. 1977. Similarity of the general designs of protochordates and invertebrates. Nature 266, 533.
18. Russell, G.J., Walker, P.M., Elton, R.A., and Subak-Sharpe, J.H. 1976. Doublet frequency analysis of fractionated vertebrate nuclear DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 108, 1.
19. Schwartz, S., Zhang, Z., Frazer, K.A., Smit, A., Riemer, C., Bouck, J., Gibb, R., Hardison, R., and Miller, W. 2000. Pipmaker - a web server for aligning two genomic DNA sequences. Genome Res. 10, 577.
20. Wang, D.G., Fan, J.B., Siao, C.J., Berno, A., Young, R., Sapolsky, R., et al. 1998. Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the humane genome. Science 280, 1077.
21. Yang, Z., and Yoder, A.D. 1999. Estimation of the transition/ transversion rate bias and species sampling. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 274.