How introverts versus extroverts approach small-group argumentative discussions

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 183-197

  Nussbaum, E Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242648121     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/499699     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ames, G. J., & Murray, F. B. (1982). When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive change by social conflict. Developmental Psychology, 18, 894-897.
2. Beatty, M. J., McCroskey, J. C., & Heisel, A. D. (1998). Communication apprehension as temperamental expression: A communibiological paradigm. Communication Monographs, 65, 197-219.
3. Blickle, G. (1996). Who really cares for the better arguments? Construction and validation of scales assessing assertive and consensus motives in argumentation. Zeitschrift Fuer Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 17, 109-118.
4. Blickle, G. (1997). Argumentativeness and the facets of the big five. Psychological Reports, 81, 1379-1385.
5. Chapman, M., & McBride, M. L. (1992). The education of reason: Cognitive conflict and its role in intellectual development. In C. U. Shantz & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 36-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Chi, M. T. H. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
7. Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Revieiu of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
8. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9. Damon, W., & Killen, M. (1982). Peer interaction and the process of change in children's moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 28, 347-367.
10. Das, J. P., Schokman-Gates, K. L., & Murphy, D. (1986). Development of a measure of extraversion and neuroticism for mentally retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90, 540-549.
11. Dewaele, J. M., & Furnham, A. (2000). Personality and speech production: A pilot study of second language learners. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 355-365.
12. Dillon, J. T. (1988). Questioning and discussion: A miiltidisciplinary study. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect (A. St. James-Emler & N. Emler, Trans., in collaboration with D. Mackie). New York: Pergamon.
14. Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality (pp. 244-276). New York: Guilford.
15. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum.
16. Eysenck, S. B. G. (1963). Manual for the Junior Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
17. Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D. (1990). Outcomes of the discussion method. In W. W. Wilen (Ed.), Teaching and learning through discussion: The theory, research and practice of the discussion method (pp. 25-44). Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
18. Gray, J. A. (1987). Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 493-509.
19. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer- and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379-432.
20. Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S. (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 72-80.
21. Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types (H. G. Baynes, Trans.; revised by R. F. C. Hull). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921)
22. Keefer, M. W., Zeitz, C. M., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 53-81.
23. Loffredo, D. A., & Opt, S. K. (1998). Relating the MBTI to communication apprehension, receiver apprehension, and argumentativeness. Journal of Psychological Type, 47, 21-27.
24. Mason, L. (1995, April). Collaborative reasoning on self-generated analogies: Conceptual growth in understanding scientific phenomena. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
25. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
26. Muntigl, P., & Turnbull, W. (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 225-256.
27. Nussbaum, E. M. (1998). The evolution of argumentation in an alternative learning environment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(09), 3417A. (University Microfilms No. DA9810180)
28. Nussbaum, E. M. (in press). The process of becoming a participant in small-group critical discussions: A case study. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy.
29. Owens, L., & Straton, R. G. (1980). The development of a co-operative, competitive, and individualised learning preference scale for students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 147-161.
30. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
31. Resnick, L., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C. N., & Wathen, S. H. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Special issue in discourse and shared reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 347-364.
32. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
33. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1979). An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
35. Walton, D. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Webb, N. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-423.