Proline induces the expression of salt-stress-responsive proteins and may improve the adaptation of Pancratium maritimum L. to salt-stress

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 54, Issue 392, 2003, Pages 2553-2562

  Khedr, Abdel Hamid A ^a   Abbas, Mohammad A ^b   Abdel Wahid, Amal A ^b   Quick, W Paul ^c   Abogadallah, Gaber M ^a  

^a Faculty of Science at New Damietta   (Egypt)

^b Mansoura University   (Egypt)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Growth; Pancratium maritimum L.; Proline; Salt responsive genes

Indexed keywords

ANTIOXIDANTS; DEGRADATION; GELS; PROTEINS; SALTS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; STRESS ANALYSIS;

SALT STRESS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ANTIOXIDANT; CATALASE; CSA PROTEIN, CITRUS SINENSIS; DEHYDRIN PROTEINS, PLANT; PROLINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; UBIQUITIN; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; OSMOLARITY; PLANT; PLANT ROOT;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANTIOXIDANTS; CATALASE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; PROLINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; UBIQUITIN;

CITRUS; CITRUS SINENSIS; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PANCRATIUM;

EID: 0242628041     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erg277     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aebi H. 1984. Catalase in vitro. Methods in Enzymology 105, 121-126.
2. Baisak R, Rana D, Acharya PBB, Kar M. 1994. Alterations in activities of oxygen active scavenging enzymes of wheat leaves subjected to water stress. Plant and Cell Physiology 35, 489-495.
3. Bartels D, Salamini F. 2001. Desiccation tolerance in the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. A contribution to the study of drought tolerance at the molecular level. Plant Physiology 127, 1346-1353.
4. Bates LE, Waldren RP, Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil 39, 205-207.
5. Cellier F, Conejero G, Breitler JC, Casse F. 1998. Molecular and physiological responses to water deficit in drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive lines of sunflower. Plant Physiology 116, 319-328.
6. Chance B, Maehly AC. 1955. Assay of catalase and peroxidases. Methods in Enzymology 2, 764-775.
7. Claes B, Dekeyser R, Villarroell R, Van Den Bulke M, Bauw G, Van Montagu M, Caplan A. 1990. Characterization of a rice gene showing organ-specific expression in response to salt stress and drought. The Plant Cell 2, 19-27.
8. Close TJ, Fenton RD, Moonan F. 1993. A view of plant dehydrins using antibodies specific to the carboxy terminal peptide. Plant Molecular Biology 23, 279-286.
9. Cochrane MP, Paterson L, Gould E. 2000. Changes in chlazal cell walls and in the peroxidase enzymes of the crease region during grain development in barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 507-520.
10. Csonka LN. 1981. Proline overproduction results in enhanced osmotolerance in Salmonella thyphimurium. Molecular Gene and Genetics 182, 82-86.
11. Garcia A-B, de Almeida Engler J, Iyer S, Gerats T, Van Monatgu M, Caplan AB. 1997. Effects of osmoprotectants upon NaCl in rice. Plant Physiology 115, 159-169.
12. Hamilton EW, Heckathorn SA. 2001. Mitochondrial adaptation to NaCl. Complex I is protected by Antioxidants and small heat shock proteins, whereas complex II is protected by proline and betaine. Plant Physiology 126, 1266-1274.
13. Hernandez JA, Jimenez P, Mullineaux P, Sevilla F. 2000. Tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to long-term salt-stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defences. Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 853-862.
14. Hewitt EJ. 1966. Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. Technical Communication 22. GB: Commonwealth Bureaux of Horticulture Plantation Crops.
15. Iyer S, Caplan A. 1998. Products of proline catabolism can induce osmotically regulated genes. Plant Physiology 116, 203-211.
16. Le-Rudulier D, Strom AR, Dandekar AM, Smith LT, ValentineRC. 1984. Molecular biology of osmoregulation. Science 224, 1064-1068.
17. Lin CC, Kao CH. 2001. Cell wall peroxidase activity, hydrogen peroxide level and NaCl-inhibited root growth of rice seedlings. Plant and Soil 230, 135-143.
18. MacCue KF, Hanson AD. 1990. Drought and salt tolerance. Trends in Biotechnology 8, 358-362.
19. Mittler R, Merquiol E, Hallak-Herr E, Rachmilevitch S, Kaplan A, Cohen M. 2001. Living under a 'dormant' canopy: a molecular acclimation mechanism of the desert plant Retama raetam. The Plant Journal 25, 407-416.
20. Nanjo T, Kobayashi M, Yoshiba Y, Yukika S, Keishiro W, Tsukaya H, Kakubari Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. 1999. Biological functions of proline in morphogenesis and osotolerance revealed in antisense transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 18, 185-193.
21. Okuma E, Soeda K, Tada M, Murata Y. 2000. Exogenous proline mitigates the inhibition of growth of Nicotiana tabacum cultured cells under saline conditions. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 46, 257-263.
22. O'Mahony PJ, Oliver MJ. 1999. The involvement of ubiquitin in vegetative desiccation tolerance. Plant Molecular Biology 41, 657-667.
23. Sairam RK, Saxena DC. 2000. Oxidative stress and antioxidants in wheat: possible mechanism of water stress tolerance. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 184, 55-61.
24. Samaras Y, Bressan RA, Csonka LN, Gracia-Rios MG, Paino D'Urzo M, Rhodes D. 1995. Proline accumulation during drought and salinity. In: Smirnoff N, ed. Environment and plant metabolism: flexibility and accumulation. Oxford, UK: BIOS Scientific Publishers, 161-187.
25. Saranga Y, Rhodes D, Janick J. 1992. Changes in amino acid composition associated with tolerance to partial desiccation of celery somatic embryos. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 111, 337-341.
26. Schneider K, Wells B, Schmelzer E, Salamini F, Bartels D. 1993. Desiccation leads to the rapid accumulation of both cytosolic and chloroplastic proteins in the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum Hochst. Planta 189, 120-131.
27. 2. Plant Physiology 110, 393-402.
28. Serrano R, Gaxiola R. 1994. Microbial models and stress tolerance in plants. Critical Review of Plant Science 13, 121-138.
29. Sgherri CL, Navari-Izzo F. 1995. Sunflower seedlings subjected to water deficit stress: oxidative stress and defence mechanisms. Physiologia Plantarum 93, 25-30.
30. Shalata A, Mittova V, Volokita M, Guy M, Tal M. 2001. Response of cultivated tomato and its wild salt-tolerant relative Lycopersicon pennelli to salt-dependent oxidative stress: the root antioxidative system. Physiologia Plantarum 122, 487-194.
31. Stewart CR, Lee JA. 1974. The role of proline accumulation in halophytes. Planta 120, 279-289.
32. Ushimaru T, Kanematsu S, Katayama M, Tsuji H. 2001. Antioxidative enzymes in seedlings of Nelumbo nucifera germinated under water stress. Physiologia Plantarum 112, 39-46.
33. Werner JE, Finkelstein RR. 1995. Arabidopsis mutants with reduced response to NaCl and osmotic stress. Physiologia Plantarum 93, 659-666.
34. Woodbury W, Spencer AK, Stahmann MA. 1971. An improved procedure using ferricyanide for detecting catalase isozymes. Analytical Biochemistry 44, 301-305.
35. Yancey PH, Clark ME, Hand SC, Bowlus RD, Somero GN. 1982. Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science 217, 1214-1222.
36. Yen HE, Wu S, Hung Y, Yen S. 2000. Isolation of three salt-induced low abundance cDNAs from light grown callus of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum suppression subtractive hybridisation. Physiologia Plantarum 110, 402-409.
37. Zahran MA, Willis AJ. 1992. The vegetation of Egypt. Chapman and Hall. Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 54, No. 392, pp. 2563-2568, November 2003