Multilevel phenotypic selection on morphological characters in a metapopulation of Silene tatarica

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 509-517

  Aspi, Jouni ^a   Jäkäläniemi, Anne ^a   Tuomi, Juha ^a   Siikamäki, Pirkko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Contextual analysis; Group selection; Herbivory; Pollination; Selection gradient

Indexed keywords

DISTURBANCE; GROUP SELECTION; HERBIVORY; MORPHOLOGY; POLLINATION;

ANIMALIA; RANGIFER TARANDUS; RIPARIA; SILENE; SILENE TATARICA;

EID: 0242584417     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01542.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aarssen, L. W. 1995. Hypotheses for the evolution of apical dominance in plants: implications for the interpretation of overcompensation. Oikos 74:149-256.
2. Andersson, S. 1991. Floral display and pollination success in Achillea ptarmica (Asteraceae). Holarct. Ecol. 14:186-191.
3. _. 1992. Phenotypic selection in a population of Crepis tectorum ssp. pumila (Asteracae). Can. J. Bot. 70:89-95.
4. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719.
5. _. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38:720-734.
6. Banschbach, V. S., and J. M. Herbers. 1996. Complex colony structure in social insects: II. Reproduction, queen-worker conflict, and levels of selection. Evolution 50:298-307.
7. Boyd, L. H. and G. R. Iversen. 1979. Contextual analysis: concepts and statistical techniques. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
8. Brodie, E. D., III, A. J. Moore and F. Janzen. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:313-318.
9. Cambell, D. R. 1989. Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female pollination success. Evolution 43:318-334.
10. Danell, K., K. Edenius, and P. Lundberg. 1991. Herbivory and tree stand composition: Moose patch use in winter. Ecology 72:1350-1357.
11. Donnelly, S. E., C. J. Lortie, and L. W. Aarssen. 1998. Pollination in Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae): The advantage of being tall. Am. J. Bot. 85:1618-1625.
12. Eckhart, V. M. 1991. The consequences of floral display for pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis. Evol. Ecol. 5:370-384.
13. _. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescens. Pp. 123-148 in M. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin.
14. Frankham, R., J. D. Ballou, and Briscoe, D. A. 2002. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
15. Galen, C. and J. Cuba. 2001. Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 55:1963-1971.
16. Geber, M. A. 1990. The cost of meristem limitation in Polygonum arenastrum: negative genetic correlations between fecundity and growth. Evolution 44:799-819.
17. Goodnight, C. J., and L. Stevens. 1997. Experimental studies of group selection: What do they tell us about group selection in nature? Am. Nat. 150S:59-79.
18. Goodnight, C. J., J. M. Schwartz, and L. Stevens. 1992. Contextual analysis of models of group selection, soft selection, hard selection, and the evolution of altruism. Am. Nat. 140:743-761.
19. Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L Tathan, and W. C. Black. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall, NJ.
20. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
21. Hanski, I., and O. Ovaskainen. 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755-758.
22. Harder, L. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373:512-515.
23. Heisler, I. L., and J. Damuth. 1987. A method for analyzing selection in hierarchically structured populations. Am. Nat. 130:582-602.
24. Hjältén, J., K. Danell, and P. Lundberg. 1993. Herbivore avoidance by association: Vole and hare utilization of woody plants. Oikos 68:125-131.
25. Hoekstra, H. E., J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, A. Hoang, C. E. Hill, P. Beerli, and J. G. Kingsolver. 2001. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:9157-9160.
26. Huhta, A.-P., J. Tuomi, and P. Rautio. 1999. Cost of apical dominance in two monocarpic herbs, Erysimum strictum and Rhinanthus minor. Can. J. Bot. 78:591-599.
27. Huhta, A.-P., T. Lennartsson, J. Tuomi, P. Rautio, and K. Laine. 2000. Tolerance of Gentianella campestris in relation to damage intensity: an interplay between apical dominance and herbivory. Evol. Ecol. 13:373-392.
28. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-261.
29. Koutaniemi, L. 1984. The role of ground frost, snow cover, ice break-up and flooding in the fluvial processes of the Oulanka river, NE Finland. Fennia 162:127-161.
30. Kwak, M. M., O. Veltetrop, and J. van Andel. 1998. Pollen and gene flow in fragmented habitats. Appl. Vegetat. Sci. 1:37-54.
31. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 36:1210-1226.
32. Lortie, C. J., and L. W. Aarssen. 1999. The advantage of being tall: Higher flowers receive more pollen in Verbascum thapsus L. (Scrophulariaceae). Ecoscience 6:68-71.
33. McNaughton, S. J. 1978. Serengeti ungulates: Feeding selectively influences the effectivity of plant defense guilds. Science 199:806-807.
34. Mitchell-Olds, T., and R. G. Shaw. 1987. Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical interferences and biological interpretations. Evolution 41:1149-1161.
35. Mustajärvi, K., P. Siikamäki, S. Rytkönen, and A. Lammi. 2001. Consequences of plant population size and density for plant-pollinator interactions and plant performance. J. Ecol. 89:80-87.
36. Oostermeijer, F. G. B., S. H. Luijten, T. Petanidou, M. Kos, A. C. Ellis-Adam, and H. C. M. den Nijs. 2000. Pollination in rare plants: is population size important? Pp. 201-213 in Ø. Totland, ed. The Scandinavian association for pollination ecology honours Knut Fægri. Det Norske Videnskap-Akademi, Oslo.
37. Peakall, R., and S. N. Handel. 1994. Pollinators discriminate among floral heights of a sexually deceptive orchid: implications for selection. Evolution 47:1681-1687.
38. Pedersen, B., and J. Tuomi. 1995. Hierarchical selection and fitness in modular and clonal organisms. Oikos 73:167-180.
39. Price, G. R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520-521.
40. Rathke, B. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. Pp. 305-329 in L. Real, ed. Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
41. Rausher, M. D. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46:616-626.
42. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
43. Robertson, A. W., and M. R. Macnair. 1995. The effects of floral display size on pollinator service to individual flowers of Myosotis and Mimulus. Oikos 72:106-114.
44. Schmid-Hempel, P. and B. Speiser. 1988. Effects of inflorescence size on pollination in Epilobium angustifolium. Oikos 53:98-104.
45. Stevens, L., C. J. Goodnight, and S. Kalisz. 1995. Multilevel selection in natural populations of Impatiens capensis. Am. Nat. 145:513-526.
46. Stinchcombe, J. R., M. T. Rutter, D. S. Burdick, P. Tiffin, M. D. Rausher, and R. Mauricio. 2002. Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: theory and practice. Am. Nat. 160:511-523.
47. Tilman, D., J. Knops, D. Wedin, P. Reich, M. Ritchie, and E. Siemann 1997. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1300-1302.
48. Totland, Ø. 1999. Effects of temperature on performance and phenotypic selection on plant traits in alpine Ranunculus acris. Oecologia 120:242-251.
49. Tsuji, K. 1995. Reproductive conflicts and levels of selection in the ant Pristomyrmex pungens: contextual analysis and partitioning of covariance. Am. Nat. 146:586-607.
50. Tuomi, J., and M. Augner. 1993. Synergistic selection of unpalatability in plants. Evolution 47:668-672.
51. Tuomi, J., and T. Vuorisalo. 1989. Hierarchical selection in modular organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4:209-213.
52. Vuorisalo, T., J. Tuomi, B. Pedersen, and P. Käär. 1997. Hierarchical selection in clonal plants. Pp. 243-261 in de H. Kroon and J. van Groendael, eds. The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys, Leiden.
53. Wade, M. J., and S. J. Arnold. 1980. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice and sperm precedence. Anim. Behav. 28:446-461.
54. Wade, M. J., and S. Kalisz. 1990. The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44:1947-1955.
55. Wahlberg, N., A. Moilanen, and I. Hanski. 1996. Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273:1536-1538.
56. Wyatt, R. 1982. Inflorescence architecture: How flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit-set. Am. J. Bot. 69:585-594.
57. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, NJ.