Who's in charge?; Intermediate levels of control for robots we can live with

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages 462-467

  Miller, Christopher A ^a   Parasuraman, Raja ^b  

^a SMART INFORMATION FLOW TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

Delegation; Hierarchical task model; Mixed initiative; Supervisory control; Tasking

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; ROBOTS; SCADA SYSTEMS;

HIERARCHICAL TASK MODEL; HUMAN HUMAN SUPERVISORY; HUMAN ROBOTIC INTERACTION; MIXED INITIATIVE;

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0242576576     PISSN: 08843627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. R. Amalberti, "Automation in aviation: A human factors perspective," in Handbook of aviation human factors, D. Garland, J. Wise and V. Hopkins, Eds., pp. 173-192, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum, 1999.
2. L. Bainbridge, "Ironies of automation," Automatica, vol. 19, pp. 775-779, 1983.
3. C. Billings, Aviation Automation: The search for a human-centered approach, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum, 1997.
4. A. Bisantz, S. Cohen, M. Gravelle and K. Wilson, "To cook or not to cook: A case study of decision aiding in quick-service restaurant environments," Georgia Institute of Technology, College of Computing, Atlanta, GA, Report No. GIT-CS-96/03, 1996.
5. S. Casey, Set Phasers on Stun, Aegean Publishing Company, Santa Barbara, CA, 1993.
6. F. Colucci, "Rotorcraft Pilot's Associate Update: The Army's Largest Science and Technology Program," Vertiflite, pp. 16-20, March/April, 1995.
7. M. Endsley and E. Kiris, "The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation," Human Factors, vol. 37, pp. 381-394, 1995.
8. K. Erol, J. Hendler, D. Nau, "UMCP: A sound and complete procedure for hierarchical task network planning," in AI Planning Sys.: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf., Los Altos, CA, pp. 249-254, 1994.
9. D. Kaber, E. Omal, and M. Endsley, "Level of automation effects on telerobot performance and human operator situation awareness and subjective workload," in Auto. Tech & Human Perf.: Current research and Trends, M. Mouloua and R. Parasuraman, Eds., pp. 165-170, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1999.
10. R. Karasek and T. Theorell, Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New York, 1990.
11. A. Kirlik, "Modeling strategic behavior in human-automation interaction: Why an 'aid' can (and should) go unused," Human Factors, vol. 35, pp. 221-242, 1993.
12. G. Klein, Sources of Power; How People Make Decisions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
13. C. Layton, P. Smith, and E. McCoy, "Design of a cooperative problem solving system for enroute flight planning: An empirical evaluation," Human Factors, vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 94-119, 1994.
14. J. Lee and N. Moray, "Trust, control strategies, and allocation of function in human-machine systems," Ergonomics, vol. 35, pp. 1243-1270, 1992.
15. J. Lee and N. Moray, "Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation," Int. Jour. Hum. Comp. Studies, vol. 40, pp. 153-184, 1994.
16. M. Lewis, "Designing for human-agent interaction," AI. Magazine, pp. 67-78, Summer, 1998.
17. C. Miller, "Bridging the Information Transfer Gap: Measuring Goodness of Information Fit," Jour. Visual Lang. and Comp., vol. 10, pp. 523-558, 1999.
18. C. Miller, and R. Parasuraman, Beyond levels of automation: An architecture for more flexible human-automation collaboration. To appear in Proc. Human Factors & Erg. Soc., Denver, October, 2003.
19. C. Miller, & R. Parasuraman, Designing for flexible human-automation interaction: Playbooks for supervisory control, unpublished report, SIFT, Mpls. MN, 2002.
20. C. Miller, M. Pelican & R. Goldman, "Tasking" Interfaces for Flexible Interaction with Automation: Keeping the Operator in Control. In Proc. Conf. Human Int. with Complex Sys. UIUC, Ill, May, 2000.
21. M. McNesese, E. Salas, and M. Endsley, New Trends in Cooperative Activities. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 2001.
22. N. Moray, Mental workload. Plenum, New York, 1979.
23. K. Mosier & L. Skitka, "Human decision makers and automated decision aids," in Auto. Tech. & Human Perf.: Theory and Appl, R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua, Eds., pp. 201-220, Earlbau, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.
24. R. Opperman, Adaptive User Support, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1994.
25. R. Parasuraman, R. Malloy, and I. Singh, "Performance consequences of automation-induced 'complacency,'" Int. Jour. of Av. Psych, vol. 3, pp. 1-23, 1993.
26. R. Parasuraman and V. Riley, "Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse," Human Factors, vol. 39, pp. 230-253, 1997.
27. R. Parasuraman, T. Sheridan and C. Wickens, "A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. - Part A: Syst. And Hum., vol. 30, pp. 286-297, 2000.
28. Parasuraman, R., Galster, S., and Miller, C. (in press). Human Control of Multiple Robots in the RoboFlag Simulation Environment. To appear in Proc. IEEE SMC. Washington, DC, October, 2003.
29. C. Perrow, Normal Accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books, USA, 1984.
30. J. Rasmussen, Information processing and human-machine interaction. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.
31. J. Reason, Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate Publishing., Aldershot, UK, 1997.
32. V. Riley, Human Use of Automation, unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1994.
33. N. Sarter & D. Woods, "How in the world did we ever get into that mode?," Human Factors, vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 5-19, 1995.
34. N. Sarter, D. Woods & C. Billings, "Automation Surprises," in Hndbk. of Hum. Fact. and Erg., 2nd ed., G. Salvendy, Ed., Wiley, New York, pp. 1926-1943, 1997.
35. M. Scerbo, "Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation," In Automation & human performance: Theory & applications, R. Parasuraman, & M. Mouloua, Eds. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 37-63, 1996.
36. L. Shattuck, Communication of Intent in Distributed Supervisory Control Systems. Unpublished dissertation. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 1995.
37. T. Sheridan, "Supervisory Control," in Handbook of Human Factors. G. Salvendy, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 1244-1268, 1987.
38. T. Sheridan & W. Verplank, "Human & Computer control of undersea teleoperators," MIT Man-Machining Systems Laboratory, Cambridge, MA. Tech Report, 1978.
39. U. Metzger & R. Parasuraman, "The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: An empirical study of active control versus passive monitoring," Human Factors, vol. 43, pp. 519-528, 2001.
40. K. Vicente, Cognitive work analysis. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1999.
41. E. Weiner, "Cockpit Automation," in E. Weiner & D. Nagek, Eds., Human Factors in Aviation, Academic, San Diego, pp. 433-461, 1988.
42. C. Wickens, "Designing for situation awareness and trust in automation," in Proc. IFAC Conf. on Int. Syst. Eng., Baden-Baden, Germany, pp. 174-179, 1994.
43. E. Wiener & R. Curry, "Flight-deck automation: Promises and problems," Ergonomics, vol. 23, pp. 995-1011, 1980.
44. Wickens, C., Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 2nd Ed. Harper-Collins, New York, 1992.
45. C. Wickens, A. Mavor, R. Parasuraman, and J. McGee, The future of air traffic control: Human operators and automation. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1998.
46. D. Woods, "Decomposing automation: Apparent simplicity, real complexity," in Auto. and Human Perf.: Theory and Applications, R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua, Eds., Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 1-16, 1996.