Reexamining data from the national reading panel's meta-analysis: Implications for school psychology

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 605-612

  Burns, Matthew K ^a  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242574707     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.10110     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Aaron, P.G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461-502.
2. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. American Psychological Association. (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). Washington, DC: author.
4. Casey, A., & Howe, K. (2002). Best practices in early literacy skills. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.) Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 721-736). Bethesda. MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Coles, G. (2000). Misreading reading: The bad science that hurts children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Cooper, H., Valentine, J.C., & Charlton, K. (2000). The methodology of meta-analysis. In R. Gersten, E.P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 263-280). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Cunningham, J.W. (2001). Book review of the Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 326-335.
9. Derzon, J.H. (2001). Antisocial behavior and the prediction of violence: A meta-analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 93-106.
10. Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Willows, D.M., Valeska Schuster, B. Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250-287.
11. Fukkink, R.G., & de Glopper, K. (1998). Effects of instruction in deriving word meaning from context: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 68, 450-469.
12. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). The professional knowledge base of instructional practices that support cognitive growth for English-language learners. In R. Gersten, E.P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 31-79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Greenberg, D., Ehri, L.C., & Pehrin, D. (1997). Are word reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and 3rd-5th graders matched for reading level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 262-275.
15. Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
16. Henson, R.K., & Smith, A.D. (2000). State of the art in statistical significance and effect size reporting: A review of the APA Task Force report and current trends. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33, 285-296.
17. Joseph, L.M. (2002). Best practices in planning interventions for students with reading problems. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 803-816). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
18. Kavale, K.A. (1984). Potential advantages of the meta-analysis technique for research in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 18, 61-72.
19. Kavale, K.A.. & Forness, S.R. (2000). Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta-analysis. In R. Gersten, E.P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 281-326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Keith, T. Z. (2002). Best practices in applied research. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 91-102). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
21. Kirk, R.E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
22. Kratochwill, T.R., & Stoiber, K.C. (2000). Uncovering critical research agendas for school psychology: Conceptual dimensions and future directions. School Psychology Review, 29, 591-603.
23. Lehner, J.W. (2000). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies (8th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Lyon, G.R. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3-27.
25. Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press.
27. Riniolo, T.C. (1997). Publication bias: A computer-assisted demonstration of excluding nonsignificant results from research interpretation. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 279-282.
28. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "File Drawer Problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
29. Salkind, N.J. (2000). Exploring research. Upper Saddle Creek, NJ: McGraw-Hill.
30. Sharpe, D. (1997). Of apples and oranges, file drawers, and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 881-901.
31. Swanson, H.L. (1989). Phonological processes and other routes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 493-497.
32. Troia, G.A. (1999). Phonological awareness intervention research: A critical review of the experimental methodology. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 28-52.
33. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
34. Weichel Murawski, W. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where are the data? Remedial & Special Education, 22, 258-267.
35. Ysseldyke, J., Dawson, P., Lehr, C., Reschly, D., Reynolds, M., & Telzrow, C. (1997). School psychology: A blueprint for training and practice (2nd ed.). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.