Developmental Dynamics and Contemporary Evolutionary Psychology: Status Quo or Irreconcilable Views? Reply to Bjorklund (2003), Krebs (2003), Buss and Reeve (2003), Crawford (2003), and Tooby et al. (2003)

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 129, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 866-872

  Lickliter, Robert ^a   Honeycutt, Hunter ^b  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; EVOLUTION; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGY; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 0242574520     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.866     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Alberch, P. (1982). The generative and regulatory roles of development in evolution. In D. Mosakowski & G. Roth (Eds.), Environmental adaptation and evolution (pp. 19-36). Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer-Verlag.
2. Bjorklund, D. F. (2003). Evolutionary psychology from a developmental systems perspective: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 836-841.
3. Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1-30.
4. Buss, D. M., & Reeve, H. K. (2003). Evolutionary psychology and developmental dynamics: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 848-853.
5. Cacioppo, J. T., Bernston, G. G., Sheridan, J. F., & McClintock, M. K. (2000). Multilevel integrative analysis of human behavior: Social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 829-843.
6. Cervone, D. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and explanation in personality psychology: How do we know which module to invoke? American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 1001-1014.
7. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Cognition, 31, 187-276.
8. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1997). Evolutionary psychology: A primer. Retrieved January 14, 2002, from the University of California, Santa Barbara, Center for Evolutionary Psychology Web site: http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/primer.html
9. Crawford, C. B. (2003). A prolegomenon for a more viable evolutionary psychology - The myth and the reality: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 854-857.
10. Crawford, C., & Krebs, D. L. (1998). Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter Hawthorne.
12. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1999). The truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian view of parental love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Davies, P. S. (1996). Evolutionary theory in cognitive psychology. Minds and Machines, 6, 445-462.
14. DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Braverman, J., & Salovey, P. (2002). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1103-1116.
15. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1997). Beyond difference: A biologist's perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 233-258.
16. Fiddick, L., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). No interpretation without representation: The role of domain-specific representations in the Wason selection task. Cognition, 77, 1-79.
17. Fodor, J. (2000). Why are we so good at detecting cheaters? Cognition, 75, 29-32.
18. Francis, R. C. (1990). Causes, proximate and ultimate. Biology and Philosophy, 5, 401-415.
19. Gaulin, S. J. C., & McBurney, D. H. (2002). Psychology: An evolutionary approach. New York: Prentice Hall.
20. Gehring, W. (1998). Master control genes in development and evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Gilbert, S. F. (2000). Developmental biology (6th ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
22. Gottlieb, G. (1992). Individual development and evolution: The genesis of novel behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Gottlieb, G. (1998). Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105, 792-802.
24. Gottlieb, G. (2000). Environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 93-97.
25. Gottlieb, G. (2002). Developmental-behavioral initiation of evolutionary change. Psychological Review, 109, 211-218.
26. Gottlieb, G., & Halpern, C. T. (2002). A relational view of causality in normal and abnormal development. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 421-435.
27. Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Hall, B. K. (1999). Evolutionary developmental biology (2nd ed.). Boston: Kluwer.
29. Harris, C. R. (2003). A review of Sex differences in sexual jealousy, including self-report data, psychophysiological responses, interpersonal violence, and morbid jealousy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 102-128.
30. Ingold, T. (2002). Between evolution and history: Biology, culture, and the myth of human origins. Proceedings of the British Academy, 112, 43-66.
31. Jablonka, E. (2001). The systems of inheritance. In S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, & R. D. Gray (Eds.), Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution (pp. 99-116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Jamieson, I. G. (1986). The functional approach to behavior: Is it useful? American Naturalist, 127, 195-208.
33. Johnston, T. D., & Gottlieb, G. (1990). Neophenogenesis: A developmental theory of phenotypic evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 147, 471-495.
34. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2000). Why babies' brains are not Swiss army knives. In H. Rose & S. Rose (Eds.), Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 209-228). New York: Harmony Books.
35. Keller, E. F. (2000). The century of the gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Kirschner, M., & Gerhart, J. (1998). Evolvability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 8420-8427.
37. Krebs, D. L. (2003). Fictions and facts about evolutionary approaches to human behavior: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 842-847.
38. Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (1978). An introduction to behavioral ecology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
39. Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Li, S.-C. (2003). Biocultural orchestration of developmental plasticity across levels: The interplay of biology and culture in shaping the mind and behavior across the life span. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 171-194.
41. Lickliter, R., & Berry, T. D. (1990). The phylogeny fallacy: Developmental psychology's misapplication of evolutionary theory. Developmental Review, 10, 348-364.
42. Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2003). Developmental dynamics: Toward a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 819-835.
43. Mayr, E. (1961, November 10). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501-1506.
44. Miller, L. C., Putcha-Bhagavatula, A., & Pedersen, W. C. (2002). Men's and women's mating preferences: Distinct evolutionary mechanisms? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 88-93.
45. Moss, L. (2003). What genes can't do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Newman, S. A., & Muller, G. B. (2000). Epigenetic mechanisms of character origination. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 288, 304-317.
47. O'Grady, R. T. (1984). Evolutionary theory and teleology. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 107, 563-578.
48. Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. D. (2001). Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Raff, R. A. (1996). The shape of life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Richardson, K. (1998). The origins of human potential: Evolution, development and psychology. London: Routledge.
52. Robert, J. S. (2001). Interpreting the homeobox: Metaphors of gene action and activation in development and evolution. Evolution and Development, 3, 287-295.
53. Rose, H. (2000). Colonizing the social sciences? In H. Rose & S. Rose (Eds.), Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 127-153). New York: Harmony Books.
54. Rose, S. (1999). Precis of Lifelines: Biology, freedom, determinism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 871-921.
55. Schlichting, C. D., & Pigliucci, M. (1998). Phenotypic evolution: A reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
56. Schlinger, H. D. (1996). How the human got its spots. Skeptic, 4, 68-76.
57. Sober, E. (1995), Natural selection and distributive explanation: A reply to Neander. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46, 384-397.
58. Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 52, 3-39.
59. Sperber, D., & Girotto, V. (2002). Use or misuse of the selection task? Rejoinder to Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby. Cognition, 85, 277-290.
60. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture: I. Theoretical considerations. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 29-49.
61. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19-136). New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Barren, H. C. (2003). The second law of thermodynamics is the first law of psychology - Evolutionary developmental psychology and the theory of tandem, coordinated inheritances: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 858-865.
63. Waddington, C. (1941, January 25). The evolution of developmental systems. Nature, 147, 108-109.
64. White, P. A. (1990). Ideas about causation in philosophy and psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 3-18.
65. Wolf, U. (1995). The genetic contribution to the phenotype. Human Genetics, 95, 127-148.
66. Wray, G. A., & Abouheif, E. (1998). When is homology not homology? Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 8, 675-680.