Does rational persuasion influence potential consultees?

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 627-640

  Truscott, Stephen D ^a   Richardson, Robert D ^a   Cohen, Celina ^a   Frank, Alicia ^a   Palmeri, Deanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242490504     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.10132     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Clark, L., & Elliott, S.N. (1988). The influence of treatment strength information on knowledgeable teachers' pretreatment evaluations of social skills training methods. Professional School Psychology, 3, 241-251.
2. Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1984). Cognitive theories of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 17, pp. 267-359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Eckert, T.L., & Hintze, J.M. (2000). Behavioral conceptions and applications of acceptability: Issues related to service delivery and research methodology. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 123-148.
4. Eckert, T.L, & Shapiro, E.S. (1999). Methodological issues in analog acceptability research: Are teachers' acceptability ratings of assessment methods influenced by experimental design? School Psychology Review, 28, 1999, 5-16.
5. Elliott, S.N. (1988). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: Review of variables that influence treatment selection. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 68-80.
6. Elliott, S.N., & Von Brock, M. (1991). The Behavior Intervention Rating Scale: Development and validation of a pretreatment acceptability and effectiveness measure. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 43-51.
7. Erchul, W.P., & Martens, B.K. (1997). School consultation: Conceptual and empirical bases of practice. New York: Plenum Press.
8. Erchul, W.P., & Raven B.H. (1997). Social power in school consultation: A contemporary view of French and Raven's bases of power model. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 137-171.
9. Finn, J., & Bock, R.D. (1984). Multivariance PC. Licolnwood, IL: SSI.
10. Gelso, C.J., & Fassinger, R.E. (1990). Counseling psychology: Theory and research on interventions. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 355-386.
11. Greenwald, A.C. (1976). Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? Psychological Bulletin, 83, 314-320.
12. Gutkin, T.B. (1999). Collaborative versus directive/prescriptive/expert school-based consultation: Reviewing and resolving a false dichotomy. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 161-190.
13. Gutkin, T.B., & Conoley, C.C. (1990). Reconceptualizing school psychology from a service delivery perspective: Implications for practice, training, and research. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 203-223.
14. Haugtvedt, C.P., & Petty, R.E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 308-319.
15. Kazdin, A.E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259-273.
16. Margolis, H., & McGettigan, J. (1988). Managing resistance to instructional modifications in mainstreamed environments. RASE, 9, 15-21.
17. McDougal, J.L., Clonan, S.M., & Martens, B.K. (2000). Using organizational change procedures to promote the acceptability of prereferral intervention strategies: The school-based intervention team project. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 149-171.
18. Meyers, J. (1989). The practice of psychology in the schools for the primary prevention of learning and adjustment problems in children: A perspective from the field of education. In L.A. Bond, & B.E. Compas (Eds.), Primary prevention and promotion in the schools (pp. 391-422). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Nastasi, B.K., & Truscott, S.D. (2000). Acceptability research in school psychology: Current trends and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 117-122.
20. Nastasi, B.K., Varjas, K., Schensul, S.L., Silva, K.T., Schensul, J.J., Ratnayake, P. (2000). The Participatory Intervention Model: A framework for conceptualizing and promoting intervention acceptability. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 207-232.
21. Noell, G.H., & Witt, J.C. (1996). A critical re-evaluation of five fundamental assumptions underlying behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 189-203.
22. O'Keefe, D.J., & Medway, F.J. (1997). Application of persuasion research to consultation in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 173-193.
23. Ott, R.L. (1993). An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
24. Petty, R.E., Baker, S.M., & Gleicher, F. (1991) Attitudes and drug abuse prevention: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Donohew & H.E. Sypher et al. (Eds.), Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention (pp. 71-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Petty, R.E., Heesacker, M., & Hughes, J.N. (1997). The elaboration likelihood model: Implications for the practice of school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 107-136.
26. President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). New era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
27. Reimers, T.M., Wacker, D.P., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212-227.
28. Reschly, D.J., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 3-20). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
29. Sheridan, S.M., & Gutkin, T.B. (2000). The ecology of school psychology: Examining and changing our paradigm for the 21st Century. School Psychology Review, 29, 485-501.
30. Skinner, M.E., & Hales, M.R. (1992). Classroom teachers' "explanations" of student behavior: One possible barrier to the acceptance and use of applied behavior analysis procedures in the schools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3, 219-232.
31. Truscott, S.D., Cosgrove, G., Meyers, J., & Eidle-Barkman, K.A. (2000). The acceptability of organizational consultation with prereferral intervention teams. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 172-206.
32. Von Brock, M.B., & Elliott, S.N. (1987). Influence of treatment effectiveness information on the acceptability of classroom interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 131-144.
33. Wickstrom, K.F., Jones, K.M., LaFleur, L.H., & Witt, J.C. (1998). An analysis of treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 141-154.
34. Yukl, G., Kim, H., & Chavez, C. (1999). Task importance, feasibility, and agent influence behavior as determinants of target commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 137-143.
35. Yukl, G., Kim, H., & Falbe, C.M. (1996). Antecedents of influence outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 309-317.
36. Yukl, G., & Tracey, J.B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525-535.