The utility of morphological characters in gastropod phylogenetics: An example from the Calyptraeidae

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 541-593

  Collin, Rachel ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^c APACHE POINT OBSERVATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Calyptraea; Cheilea; Crepidula; Crucibulum; Gastropod taxonomy

Indexed keywords

DNA; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY;

CALYPTRAEA; CALYPTRAEIDAE; CHEILEA; CREPIDULA; GASTROPODA;

EID: 0037394731     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0024-4066.2002.00166.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abbott RT. 1974. American seashells, 2nd edn. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
2. Bandel K, Riedel F. 1994. Classification of fossil and recent Calyptraeoidea (Caenogastropoda) with a discussion of neomesogastropod phylogeny. Berliner Geowiss Abhand E 13: 329-367.
3. Broderip WJ. 1834. Characters of new genera and species of Mollusca and Conchifera, collected by Mr. Cuming. Descriptions of new species of Calyptraeidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 2: 35-40.
4. Brown DI, Olivares CA. 1996. A new species of Crepidula (Mollusca: Mesogastropoda: Calyptraeidae) from Chile: additional characters for the identification of the eastern Pacific planar Crepidula group. Journal of Natural History 30: 1443-1458.
5. Carlton JT. 1979. History, biogeography, and ecology of the introduced marine and esturine invertebrates of the Pacific coast of North America. PhD Dissertation. Davis, CA, USA: University of California.
6. Coe WR. 1938. Sexual phases in the gastropod Crucibulum spinosa. Journal of Morphology 63: 345-361.
7. Coe WR. 1942a. The reproductive organs ofthe prosobranch mollusk Crepidula onyx and their transformation during the change from male to female phase. Journal of Morphology 70: 501-512.
8. Coe WR. 1942b. Influence of natural and exerimental conditions in determining shape of shell and rate of growth in gastropods of the genus Crepidula. Journal of Morphology 71: 35-47.
9. Coe WR. 1949. Divergent methods of development in morphologically similar species of prosobranch gastropods. Journal of Morphology 84: 383-400.
10. Collin R. 1995. Sex, size, and position: a test of models predicting the size at sex change in the protandrous gastropod Crepidula fornicata. American Naturalist 146: 815-831.
11. Collin R. 2000a. Life history, reproduction and development of Crepidula adunca and C. lingulata. Veliger 43: 24-33.
12. Collin R. 2000b. C. plana cryptic species complex in North America. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 1500-1514.
13. Collin R. 2002a. Another last word on Crepidula convexa and a description of C. ustulatulina sp. nov. (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) from the Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science, 70(1): 177-184.
14. Collin R. 2002b. Evolution of mode of development in. Crepidula. Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae): causes and consequences. PhD Dissertation. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago.
15. Conklin EG. 1897. The embryology of Crepidula. Journal of Morphology 13: 3-226.
16. Cunningham CW. 1997a. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylegenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylognetic methods. Systematic Biology 46: 464-478.
17. Cunningham CW. 1997b. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733-740.
18. Deslous-Paoli JM. 1985. Crepidula fornicata L. (gastéropode) dans le bassin de Marennes-Oléron: structure, dynamique et production d'une population. Oceanologica Acta 8: 453-460.
19. Dickinson AJG, Nason J, Croll RP. 1999. Histochemical localization of FMRF amide, serotonin and catecholamines in embryonic Crepidula fornicata (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia). Zoomorphology 119: 49-62.
20. Farris JS. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
21. Finlay HJ. 1924. The recent Mellusca of the Chatham Islands. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute 57: 320-485.
22. Fischer P. 1880-87. 13694. In: Manuel de Conchyliologie. Paris: Savy, 1.
23. Gallardo CS. 1979. Especies gemelas del género Crepidula (Gastropoda, Calyptraeidae) en la costa de Chile: una redescripción de C dilatata Lamarck y descripción de C. fecunda n. sp. Studies of Neotropical Fauna Environment 14: 215-226.
24. Gallardo CS. 1977. Crepidula philippiana n. sp. nuevo gastropodo Calyptraeidae de Chile con especial referencia al patron de desarrollo. Studies of Neotropical Fauna and Environment 12: 177-185.
25. Gould AA. 1846. Descriptions of shells of the exploring expedition. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History 2: 159-162.
26. Graham A. 1954. The anatomy of the prosobranch Trichotropis borealis Broderip and Sowerby, and the systematic position of the Capulidae. Journal of the Marine Biology Association of the United Kingdom 33: 129-144.
27. Hoagland KE. 1977. Systematic review of fossil and recent Crepidula. Malacologia 16: 363-420.
28. Hoagland KE. 1978. Protandry and the evolution of environmentally-mediated sex change: a study of the mollusca. Malacologia 17: 365-391.
29. Hoagland KE. 1986. Patterns of encapsulation and brooding in the Calyptraeidae (Prosobranchia: Mesogastropoda). American Malacological Bulletin 4: 173-183.
30. Keen AM. 1971. Sea shells of tropical west America, 2nd edn. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press, 1064.
31. Kleinsteuber H. 1913. Die Anatomie von Trochita, Calyptraea und Janacus. Zoologesches Jahrbuchsupplement 13: 385-476.
32. Kluge AG, Farris JS. 1969. Quanatitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18: 1-32.
33. Kool SP. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of the Rapaninae (Neogastropoda: Muricidae). Malacologia 35: 155-259.
34. Lesson RP. 1830. Mollusques. In: Dupery LJ, ed. Voyage autour du monde exécuté par ordre du roi, sur la corvette de S. M. La coquille pendant les années 1822-25. Zoologie 2(1). Paris: Bertrand, 239-488.
35. Leviton AE, Gibbs RH, Heal E, Dawson CE. 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology. Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 1985: 802-832.
36. Lima GM, Pechenik JA. 1985. The influence of temperature on growth rate and length of larval life of the gastropod Crepidula plana Say. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 90: 55-71.
37. Loomis SH, VanNieuwenhuyze W. 1985. Sediment correlates to density of Crepidula fornicata Linnaeus in the Pataguanset River, Connecticut. Veliger 27: 266-272.
38. Matusiak JP, Fell PE. 1982. Reproductive cycle of Crepidula convexa (Say) within a New England eelgrass community. International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction 5: 253-260.
39. McGee BL, Targett NM. 1989. Larval and habitat selection in Crepidula (L.) and its effect on adult distribution patterns. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 131: 195-214.
40. Menke KT. 1851. Conchylien von Mazatlan, mit kritischen Anmerkungen. Zeitscrift für Malakozoology 8: 33-38.
41. Mörch OAL. 1877. Synopsis molluscorum marinorum Indiarum occidentalium imprimis insularum danicarum. Malakozoological Blätt 24: 93-123.
42. Moritz CE. 1938. The anatomy of the gastropod Crepidula adunca Sewerby. University of California Publications in Zoology 43: 83-91.
43. Olson AA, Harbison A. 1953. Pliocene mollusca of southern Florida. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Monograph 8: 1-457.
44. Owen R. 1834. On the anatomy of Calyptraeidae. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 1: 207-212.
45. Pechenik JA. 1980. Growth and energy balance during the larval lives of three prosobranch gastropods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 44: 1-28.
46. Pechenik JA, Hilbish TJ, Eyster LS, Marshall D. 1996. Relationship between larval and juvenile growth rates in two marein gastropods, Crepidula plana and C. fornicata. Marine Biology 125: 119-127.
47. Sauriau P-G, Pichocki-Seyfried C, Walker P, de Montaudouin X, Palud C, Héral M. 1998. Crepidula fornicata L. (mollusque, gastéropode) en baie de Marennes-Oléron: cartographie des fonds par sonar á balayage latéral et estimation du stock. Oceanologica Acta 21: 1-10.
48. Schander C, Sundberg P. 2001. Useful characters in gstropod phylogeny: soft information or hard facts? Systematic Biology 50: 136-141.
49. Shenk MA, Karlson RH. 1986. Colonization of a shell resource by calyptraeid gastropods: tests of habitat selection and preemption models. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 99: 79-89.
50. Simone LRL. 2002. Comparative morphological study and phylogeny of representatives of the superfamilies Calyptraeoidea (including Hipponicoidea) (Mollusca, Caenogastropoda). Bioto Neotropica 2(2). Accessed online at http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br.
51. Simone LRL, Pastorino G, Penchaszadeh PE. 2000. Crepidula argentina (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae), a new species from the littoral of Argentina. Nautilus 114: 127-141.
52. Sullivan J. 1996. Combining data with different distribution of among-site variation. Systematic Biology 45: 375-380.
53. Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4. Sunderland, MA USA: Sinauer Associates.
54. Taylor JD, Miller JA. 1989. The morphology of the osphradium in relation to feeding habits in Meso- and Neogastropods. Journal of Molluscan Studies 55: 227-237.
55. Thiele J. 1929. Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde. Fischer Jena 1: 376.
56. Thorson G. 1965. A neotenous dwarf-form of Capulus ungaricus (L.) (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia) commensalistic on Turritella communis Risso. Ophelia 2 (1): 175-210.
57. Véliz D, Guisado C, Winkler FM. 2001. Morphological, reproductive, and genetic variability among three populations of Crucibulum quiriquinae (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) in Northern Chile. Marine Biology 139: 527-534.
58. Vermeij GJ, Carlson SJ. 2000. The muricid gastropod subfamily Rapaninae: phylogeny and ecological history. Paleobiology 26: 19-46.
59. Vermeij GJ, Lowell RB, Walters LJ, Marks JA. 1987. Good hosts and their guests: relations between trochid gastropods and the epizoic limpet Crepidula adunca. Nautilus 101: 69-74.
60. Wagner PJ. 2001. Gastropod phylogenetics: progress, problems and implications. Journal of Paleontology 75: 1128-1140.
61. Warner RR, Fitch DL, Standish JD. 1996. Social control of sex change in the shelf limpet, Crepidula norrisiarum: size-specific responses to local group composition. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 204: 155-167.
62. Wenz W. 1940. Gastropoda, Prosobranchia. In: Schindewolf OH, ed. Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Berlin: Borntraeger, 721-960.
63. Werner B. 1955. Über die Anatomie, die Entwicklung, und Biologie des Veligers und der Veliconcha von Crepidula fornicata L. (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 5: 169-217.
64. Werner B, Grell KG. 1950. Die amerikanische Pantoffelschnecke Crepidula fornicata L Eine Anleitung zur Präparation. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 24.
65. Woodruff DS, McMeekin LL, Mulvey M, Carpenter MP. 1986. Population genetics of Crepidula onyx: variation in a Californian slipper snail recently established in China. Veliger 29: 53-63.
66. Yipp MW. 1983. The anatomy of the organs of reproduction of Crepidula walshi (Mollusca: Gastropoda). In: Morton B, Dudgeon D, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China. Hong Kong: Malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China, 243-256.
67. Yoder AD, Irwin JA, Payseur BA. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 408-424.
68. Young CM. 1938. Evolution of ciliary feeding in the Prosobranchia, with an account of feeding in Capulus ungaricus. Journal of Marine Biology Association of the United Kingdon 22: 453-468.