The evolutionary significance of homeosis in flowers: A morphological perspective

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 164, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  De Ronse Craene, Louis P ^a  

^a ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Floral evolution; Homeosis; Homology; Lacandonia; Molecular genetics; Ontogeny; Papaveraceae; Rosaceae; Transformation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ECOMORPHOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FLORAL TRAIT; POLLINATION;

INSECTA; LACANDONIA; MACLEAYA; PAPAVERACEAE; RHAMNACEAE; ROSACEAE; ROSALES; SANGUINARIA;

EID: 0242407503     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/376878     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (72)

1. Albert VA, MHG Gustafsson, L Di Laurenzio 1998 Ontogenetic systematics, molecular developmental genetics, and the angiosperm petal. Pages 349-374 in DE Soltis, PS Soltis, JJ Doyle, eds. Molecular systematics of plants. II. DNA sequencing. Kluwer, Boston.
2. Barabé D, C Lacroix 1999 Homeosis, morphogenetic gradient and the determination of floral identity in the inflorescences of Philodendron solimoesense (Araceae). Plant Syst Evol 219:243-261.
3. _ 2000 Homeosis in Araceae flowers: the case of Philodendron melinonii. Ann Bot 86:479-491.
4. _ 2001 Aspects of floral development in Philodendron grandifolium and Philodendron megalophyllum (Araceae). Int J Plant Sci 162:47-57.
5. Barabé D, C Lacroix, B Jeune 2000 Development of the inflorescence and flower of Philodendron fragrantissimum (Araceae): a qualitative and quantitative study. Can J Bot 78:557-576.
6. Bateman RM, WA DiMichele 2002 Generating and filtering major phenotypic novelties: neoGoldschmidtian saltation revisited. Pages 109-159 in QCB Cronk, RM Bateman, JA Hawkins, eds. Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor & Francis, London.
7. Bateson W 1894 Materials for the study of variation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Baum DA, MJ Donoghue 2002 Transference of function, heterotopy and the evolution of plant development. Pages 52-69 in QCB Cronk, RM Bateman, JA Hawkins, eds. Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor & Francis, London.
9. Beardsell DV, EG Williams, RB Knox 1993 Homeotic, meristic and cytological floral mutants of Thryptomene calycina (family Myrtaceae). Ann Bot 72:27-36.
10. Bennek C 1958 Die morphologische Beurteilung der Staub: und Blumenblätter der Rhamnaceen. Bot Jahrb Syst 77:423-457.
11. Buzgo M 2001 Flower structure and development of Araceae compared with alismatids and Acoraceae. Bot J Linn Soc 136:393-425.
12. Coen ES 1991 The role of homeotic genes in flower development and evolution. Ann Rev Plant Phys Plant Mol Biol 42:241-279.
13. Coen ES, EM Meyerowitz 1991 The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353:31-37.
14. Cooney-Sovetts C, R Sattler 1986 Phylloclade development in the Asparagaceae: an example of homoeosis. Bot J Linn Soc 94:327-371.
15. Corner EJH 1958 Transference of function. J Linn Soc Bot 90:33-40.
16. Cronquist A 1981 An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
17. Eichler AW 1878 Blüthendiagramme. 2. Engelmann, Leipzig.
18. Endress PK 1995 Floral structure and evolution in Ranunculaceae. Plant Syst Evol 9(suppl):47-61.
19. Evans RC, TA Dickinson 1996 North American black-fruited hawthorns. II. Floral development of 10-and 20-stamen morphotypes in Crataegus section Douglasii (Rosaceae: Maloideae). Am J Bot 83:961-978.
20. _ 1999 Floral ontogeny and morphology in subfamily Amygdaloideae T. and G. (Rosaceae). Int J Plant Sci 160:955-979.
21. Frohlich MW, EM Meyerowitz 1997 The search for flower homeotic gene homologs in basal angiosperms and Gnetales: a potential new source of data on the evolutionary origin of flowers. Int J Plant Sci 158(suppl):S131-S142.
22. Hill JP, EM Lord 1989 Floral development in Arabidopsis thaliana: a comparison of the wild type and the homeotic pistillata mutant. Can J Bot 67:2922-2936.
23. Hodges SA, ML Arnold 1995 Spurring plant diversification: are floral nectar spurs a key innovation? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 262: 343-348.
24. Hoot SB 1995 Phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae based on preliminary atpB, rbcL and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data. Plant Syst Evol 9(suppl):241-251.
25. Innes RL, WR Remphrey, LM Lenz 1989 An analysis of the development of single and double flowers in Potentilla fruticosa. Can J Bot 67:1071-1079.
26. Kania W 1973 Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Rosaceenblüten. Bot Jahrb Syst 93:175-246.
27. Karrer AB 1991 Blütenentwicklung und systematische Stellung der Papaveraceae und Capparaceae. PhD diss. University of Zürich.
28. Kirchoff BK 1991 Homeosis in the flowers of the Zingiberales. Am J Bot 78:833-837.
29. _ 2000 Hofmeister's rule and primordium shape: influences on organ position in Hedychium coronarium (Zingiberaceae). Pages 75-83 in KL Wilson, DA Morrison, eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne.
30. Leavitt RG 1909 A vegetative mutant, and the principle of homeosis in plants. Bot Gaz 47:30-68.
31. Lehmann NL, R Sattler 1992 Irregular floral development in Calla palustris (Araceae) and the concept of homeosis. Am J Bot 79:1145-1157.
32. _ 1993 Homeosis in floral development of Sanguinaria canadensis and S. canadensis "Multiplex" (Papaveraceae). Am J Bot 80: 1323-1335.
33. _ 1994 Floral development and homeosis in Actaea rubra (Ranunculaceae). Int J Plant Sci 155:658-671.
34. _ 1996 Staminate floral development in Begonia cuccullata var. hookeri and three double-flowering begonia cultivars, examples of homeosis. Can J Bot 74:1729-1741.
35. _ 1997 Polyaxial development in homeotic flowers of three begonia cultivars. Can J Bot 75:145-154.
36. Li P, MO Johnston 2000 Heterochrony in plant evolutionary studies through the twentieth century. Bot Rev 66:57-88.
37. Lindenhofer A, A Weber 1999a Polyandry in Rosaceae: evidence for a spiral origin of the androecium in Spiraeoideae. Bot Jahrb Syst 121:553-582.
38. _ 1999b The spiraeoid androecium of Pyroideae and Amygdaloideae (Rosaceae). Bot Jahrb Syst 121:583-605.
39. _ 2000 Structural and developmental diversity of the androecium of Rosoideae (Rosaceae). Bot Jahrb Syst 122:63-91.
40. Mabberley DJ, A Hay 1994 Homoeosis, canalization, decanalization, "characters" and angiosperm origins. Edinb J Bot 51:117-126.
41. Maclntyre JP, CR Lacroix 1996 Comparative development of perianth and androecial primordia of the single flower and the homeotic double-flowered mutant in Hibiscus rosa-sinensis (Malvaceae). Can J Bot 74:1871-1882.
42. Márquez-Gusmán J, M Engleman, A Martínez-Mena, E Martínez, C Ramos 1989 Anatomia reproductiva de Lacandonia schismatica (Lacandoniaceae). Ann Mo Bot Gard 76:124-127.
43. Martínez E, CH Ramos 1989 Lacandoniaceae (Triuridales): una nueva familia de Mexico. Ann Mo Bot Gard 76:128-135.
44. McComb JA, C Newell, G Lullfitz 1996 A double-flowered geraldton wax (Chamelaucium uncinatum Schauer) with an anomalous flower in the ovary. Hortscience 31:283-284.
45. Morgan DR, DE Soltis, KR Robertson 1994 Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. Am J Bot 81:890-903.
46. Payer JB 1857 Traité d'organogénie comparée de la fleur. Victor Masson, Paris.
47. Pelaz S, GS Ditta, E Baumann, E Wisman, MF Yanofsky 2000 B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 405:200-203.
48. Pellmyr O 1985 The pollination biology of Actaea pachypoda and A. rubra (including A. erythrocarpa) in northern Michigan and Finland. Bull Torrey Bot Club 112:265-273.
49. Rao VS 1974 The nature of the perianth in Elaeagnus on the basis of floral anatomy with some comments on the systematic position of Elaeagnaceae. J Indian Bot Soc 53:156-161.
50. Rohwer JG 1993 Lauraceae. Pages 366-390 in K Kubitzki, JG Rohweder, V Bittrich, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol 2. Springer, Berlin.
51. Ronse De Craene LP, D Clinckemaillie, E Smets 1993 Stamen-petal complexes in Magnoliatae. Bull Jard Bot Nat Belg 62:97-112.
52. Ronse De Craene LP, E Smets 1990 The systematic relationship between Begoniaceae and Papaveraceae: a comparative study of their floral development. Bull Jard Bot Belg 60:229-273.
53. _ 1995 The androecium of Monocotyledons. Pages 243-254 in PJ Rudall, P Cribb, DF Cutler, CJ Hymphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
54. _ 1996 The morphological variation and systematic value of stamen pairs in the Magnoliatae. Feddes Repert 107:1-17.
55. _ 2001 Staminodes: their morphological and evolutionary significance. Bot Rev 67:351-402.
56. Ronse De Craene LP, PS Soltis, DE Soltis 2003 Evolution of floral structures in basal angiosperms. Int J Plant Sci 164(suppl):S329-S363.
57. Ronse De Craene LP, P Vanvinckenroye, E Smets 1998 Pseudodiplostemony, and its implications for the evolution of the androecium in the Caryophyllaceae. J Plant Res 111:-25-43.
58. Rudall PJ 2003 Monocot pseudanthia revisited: floral structure of the mycoheterotrophic family Triuridaceae. Int J Plant Sci 164(suppl): S307-S320.
59. Sattler R 1966 Towards a more adequate approach to comparative morphology. Phytomorphology 16:417-429.
60. _ 1988 Homeosis in plants. Am J Bot 75:1606-1617.
61. _ 1994 Homology, homeosis, and process morphology in plants. Pages 424-475 in BK Hall, ed. Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, New York.
62. Sattler R, R Rutishauser 1997 The fundamental relevance of morphology and morphogenesis to plant research. Ann Bot 80:571-582.
63. Smith-Huerta NL 1992 A comparison of floral development in wild type and a homeotic sepaloid petal mutant of Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). Am J Bot 79:1423-1430.
64. Soltis DE, PS Soltis, MW Chase, ME Mort, DC Albach, M Zanis, V Savolainen, et al 2000 Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot J Linn Soc 133:381-461.
65. Takahashi H 1994 A comparative study of floral development in Trillium apetalon and T. kamtschaticum (Liliaceae). J Plant Res 107: 237-243.
66. Theissen G, A Becker, K-U Winter, T Münster, C Kirchner, H Saedler 2002 How the land plants learned their floral ABCs: the role of MADS-box genes in the evolutionary origin of flowers. Pages 173-205 in QCB Cronk, RM Bateman, JA Hawkins, eds. Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor & Francis, London.
67. Tucker SC 1988a Heteromorphic flower development in Neptunia pubescens, a mimosoid legume. Am J Bot 75:205-224.
68. _ 1988b Loss versus suppression of floral organs. Pages 69-82 in P Leins, SC Tucker, PK Endress, eds. Aspects of floral development. Cramer, Berlin.
69. _ 1992 The role of floral development in studies of legume evolution. Can J Bot 70:692-706.
70. _ 2000 Floral development and homeosis in Saraca (Leguminosae: Caesalpinoideae: Detarieae). Int J Plant Sci 161:537-549.
71. von Goethe JW 1790 Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu erklären. Ettinger, Gotha.
72. Weigel D, EM Meyerowitz 1994 The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell 78:203-209.