Heterochrony in plant evolutionary studies through the twentieth century

Botanical Review

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 57-88

  Li, Ping ^a   Johnston, Mark O ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002642063     PISSN: 00068101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02857782     Document Type: Review

References (204)

1. Alberch, P. & M. J. Blanco. 1996. Evolutionary patterns in ontogenetic transformation: From laws to regularities. Int. J. Developm. Biol. 40: 845-858.
2. _, S. J. Gould, G. F. Oster & D. B. Wake. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5: 296-317.
3. Ambros, V. 1997. Heterochronic genes. Pp. 501-518 in D. L. Riddle, T. Blumenthal, B. J. Meyer & J. R. Priess (eds.), C. elegans II. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.
4. An, G. 1994. Regulatory genes controlling flowering time or floral organ development. Pl. Molec. Biol. 25: 335-337.
5. Anderson, E. & D. DeWinton. 1985. The genetics of Primula sinensis. IV. Indications as to the ontogenetic relationship of leaf and inflorescence. Ann. Bot. 49: 671-687.
6. Asama, K. 1960. Evolution of the leaf forms through the ages explained by the successive retardation and neoteny. Sci. Rep. Tôhoku Imp. Univ., ser. 2, Special vol. 4: 252-280.
7. Atchley, W. R. 1987. Developmental quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogenies. Evolution 41: 316-330.
8. _. 1990. Heterochrony and morphological change: A quantitative genetic perspective. Semin. Developm. Biol. 1: 289-297.
9. Axelrod, D. I. 1960. The evolution of flowering plants. Pp. 227-305 in S. Tax (ed.), Evolution after Darwin, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Bateman, R. M. 1994. Evolutionary-developmental change in the growth architecture of fossil rhizomorphic lycopsids: Scenarios constructed on cladistic foundations. Biol. Rev. 69: 527-597.
11. _ & W. A. DiMichele. 1991. Hizemodendron, gen. nov., a pseudoherbaceous segregate of Lepido-dendron (Pennsylvanian): Phylogenetic context for evolutionary changes in lycopsid growth architecture. Syst. Bot. 16: 195-205.
12. Bertrand-Garcia, R. & M. Freeling. 1991. Hairy-sheath-frayed1-O: a systemic, heterochronic mutant of maize that specifies slow developmental stage transitions. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 747-765.
13. Blackstone, N. W. 1987a. Allometry and relative growth: Pattern and process in evolutionary studies. Syst. Zool. 36: 76-78.
14. _. 1987b. Size and time. Syst. Zool. 36: 211-215.
15. Bolker, J. A. & R. A. Raff. 1996. Developmental genetics and traditional homology. BioEssays 18: 489-494.
16. Bookstein, F. L., B. C. Chernoff, R. L. Elder, J. M. Humphries, G. R. Smith & R. E. Strauss. 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
17. Bowman, J. L., D. R. Smyth & E. M. Meyerowitz. 1989. Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Pl. Cell 1: 37-52.
18. _, H. Sakai, T. Jack, D. Weigel, U. Mayer & E. M. Meyerowitz. 1992. SUPERMAN, a regulator of floral homeotic genes in Arabidopsis. Development 114: 599-615.
19. _, J. Alvarez, D. Weigel, E. M. Meyerowitz & D. R. Smyth. 1993. Control of flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana by APETALA1 and interacting genes. Development 119: 721-743.
20. Carlquist, S. 1969. Toward acceptable evolutionary interpretations of floral anatomy. Phytomorphology: 332-362.
21. Carlson, S. J. 1991. Development as an evolutionary force. Evolution 45: 1534-1535.
22. Cheung, M. & R. Sattler. 1967. Early floral development of Lythrum salicaria. Canad. J. Bot. 45: 1609-1618.
23. Clearwater, M. J. & K. S. Gould. 1993. Comparative leaf development of juvenile and adult Pseudopanax crassifolius. Canad. J. Bot. 72: 658-670.
24. Coen, E. S. 1991. The role of homeotic genes in flower development and evolution. Ann. Rev. Pl. Physiol. & Pl. Molec. Biol. 42: 241-279.
25. _ & J. M. Nugent. 1994. Evolution of flowers and inflorescences. Development Supplement: 107-116.
26. _, J. M. Romero, S. Doyle, R. Elliott, G. Murphy & R. Carpenter. 1990. Floricaula: A homeotic gene required for flower development in Antirrhinum majus. Cell 63: 1311-1322.
27. Colasanti, J. & V. Sundaresan. 1996. Control of the transition to flowering. Current Opin. Biotechnol. 7: 145-149.
28. Conway, L. J. & R. S. Poethig. 1993. Heterochrony in plant development. Semin. Developm. Biol. 4: 65-72.
29. Coupland, G. 1995. Regulation of flowering time: Arabidopsis as a model system to study genes that promote or delay flowering. Philos. Trans. 350: 27-34.
30. _, S. Dash, J. Goodrich, K. Lee, D. Long, M. Martin, P. Puangsomlee, J. Putterill, F. Robson, E. Sundberg & K. Wilson. 1993. Molecular and genetic analysis of the control of flowering time in response to day length in Arabidopsis thaliana. Flowering Newsletter 16: 27-32.
31. Crone, W. & E. M. Lord. 1994. Floral organ initiation and development in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) and in the organ identity mutants apetala2-1 and agamous-1. Canad. J. Bot. 72: 384-401.
32. Cronquist, A. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Ed. 2. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.
33. Demason, D. A. & P. J. Villani. 1998. Roles of the Af and Tl genes in pea leaf development: Homeosis or heterochrony? Amer. J. Bot. Supplement: 3.
34. Dengler, N. G. 1984. Comparison of leaf development in normal (+/+), entire (e/e), and lanceolate (La/+) plants of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum 'Ailsa Craig.' Bot. Gaz. 145: 66-77.
35. _. 1992. Patterns of leaf development in anisophyllous shoots. Canad. J. Bot. 70: 676-691.
36. Dickinson, T. A. 1978. Epiphylly in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 44: 181-232.
37. _ & R. Sattler. 1974. Development of the epiphyllous inflorescence of Phyllonoma integerrima (Turcz.) Loes.: Implications for comparative morphology. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 69: 1-13.
38. Diggle, P. K. 1992. Development and the evolution of plant reproductive characters. Pp. 326-355 in R. Wyatt (ed.), Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction: New approaches. Chapman & Hall, New York.
39. Donoghue, M. J. & M. J. Sanderson. 1994. Complexity and homology in plants. Pp. 393-421 in B. K. Hall (ed.), Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
40. Douglas, A. W. & S. C. Tucker. 1996. Comparative floral ontogenies among Persoonioideae including Bellendena (Proteaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 1528-1555.
41. Drews, G. N., D. Weigel & E. M. Meyerowitz. 1991. Floral patterning. Current Opin. Gen. Developm. 1: 174-178.
42. Duchartre, P. 1844. Observations sur l'organogénie de la fleur et en particulier de l'ovaire chez les plantes à placenta central libre. Ann. Sci. Nat. Paris III 2: 279-297.
43. Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of seed plants. John Wiley, New York.
44. Fink, W. L. 1982. The conceptual relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 8: 254-264.
45. _. 1988. Phylogenetic analysis and the detection of ontogenetic patterns. Pp. 71-91 in M. L. McKinney (ed.), Heterochrony in evolution: A multidisciplinary approach. Plenum Press, New York.
46. Fiorello, C. V. & R. Z. German. 1997. Heterochrony within species: Craniofacial growth in giant, standard, and dwarf rabbits. Evolution 51: 250-261.
47. Fisher, J. B. 1973. Unusual branch development in the palm Chrysalidocarpus. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 66: 83-95.
48. Flanagan, C. A. & H. Ma. 1994. Spatially and temporally regulated expression of the MADS-box gene AGL2 in wild-type and mutant Arabidopsis flowers. Pl. Molec. Biol. 26: 581-595.
49. Freeling, M., R. Bertrand-Garcia & N. Sinha. 1992. Maize mutants and variants altering developmental time and their heterochronic interactions. BioEssays 14: 227-236.
50. Friedman, W. E. & J. S. Carmichael. 1998. Heterochrony and developmental innovation of female gametophyte ontogeny in Gnetum, a highly apomorphic seed plant. Evolution 52: 1016-1030.
51. Gallardo, R., E. Dominguez & J. M. Muñoz. 1993. The heterochronic origin of the cleistogamous flower in Astragalus cymbicarpos (Fabaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 80: 814-823.
52. Ganders, F. R. 1975. Mating patterns in self-compatible distylous populations of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 53: 773-779.
53. _. 1976. Pollen flow in distylous populations of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 54: 2530-2535.
54. _. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand J. Bot. 17: 607-635.
55. Gifford, E. M. & A. S. Foster. 1989. Morphology and evolution of vascular plants. Ed. 3. W. H. Freeman, New York.
56. Gilbert, S. F., J. M. Opitz & R. A. Raff. 1996. Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Developm. Biol. 173: 357-372.
57. Gleissberg, S. & J. W. Kadereit. 1999. Evolution of leaf morphogenesis: Evidence from developmental and phylogenetic data in Papaveraceae. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 160: 787-794.
58. Goodwin, B. 1989. Morphogenesis, evolution and organic stability. Pp. 187-192 in B. David, J. L. Dommergues, J. Chalme & B. Laurin (eds.), Ontogenèse et évolution, Vol. Geobios, mémoire spécial no. 12. Édition de L'Université Claude-Bernard, Lyon.
59. Gould, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41: 587-640.
60. _. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
61. _. 1988. The uses of heterochrony. Pp. 1-13 in M. L. McKinney (ed.), Heterochrony in evolution: A multidisciplinary approach. Plenum Press, New York.
62. _. 1992. Ontogeny and phylogeny: Revisited and reunited. BioEssays 14: 275-279.
63. Greyson, R. I. 1972. Initiation and early growth of flower organs of Nigella and Lycopersicon: Insights from allometry. Bot. Gaz. 133: 184-190.
64. Guerrant, E. O. 1982. Neotenic evolution of Delphinium nudicaule (Ranunculaceae): A hummingbird-pollinated larkspur. Evolution 36: 699-712.
65. _. 1984. The role of ontogeny in the evolution and ecology of selected species of Delphinium and Limnanthes. Ph.D. diss., University of California.
66. _. 1988. Heterochrony in plants: The intersection of evolution, ecology, and ontogeny. Pp. 111-133 in M. L. McKinney (ed.), Heterochrony in evolution: A multidisciplinary approch. Plenum Press, New York.
67. _. 1989. Early maturity, small flowers and autogamy: A developmental connection? Pp. 61-84 in J. H. Bock & Y. B. Linhart (eds.), The evolutionary ecology of plants. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
68. Gupta, V. K. & G. L. Stebbins. 1969. Peroxidase activity in hooded and awned barley at successive stages of development. Biochem. Gen. 3: 15-24.
69. Haeckel, E. 1875. Die Gastrula and die Eifurchung der Thiere. Jena Z. Naturwiss 9: 402-508.
70. _. 1905. The evolution of man. Watts, London.
71. Hall, B. K. 1990. Heterochrony in vertebrate development. Developm. Biol. 1: 237-243.
72. _. 1992. Evolutionary developmental biology. Chapman & Hall, New York.
73. _. 1998. Evolutionary developmental biology. Ed. 2. Chapman & Hall, New York.
74. _, ed. 1994. Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
75. _ & T. Miyake. 1995. How do embryos measure time? Pp. 3-19 in K. J. McNamara (ed.), Evolutionary change and heterochrony. John Wiley, New York.
76. Harlan, J. R. 1945. Cleistogamy and chasmogamy in Bromus carinatus Hook. & Arn. Amer. J. Bot. 32: 66-72.
77. Haugh, G. W., E. A. Schultz & J. M. Martinez-Zapater. 1995. The regulation of flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana: Meristems, morphogenesis, and mutants. Canad. J. Bot. 73: 959-981.
78. Hill, J. P. 1996. Heterochrony in the anther. Pp. 118-135 in W. G. D'Arcy & R. C. Keating (eds.), The anther: Form, function and phylogeny. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, England.
79. _ & E. M. Lord. 1989. Floral development in Arabidopsis thaliana: A comparison of the wild type and the homeotic pistillata mutant. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 2922-2936.
80. _ & _. 1990. The role of developmental timing in the evolution of floral form. Semin. Developm. Biol. 1: 281-287.
81. _, _ & R. G. Shaw. 1992. Morphological and growth rate differences among outcrossing and self-pollinating races of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 5: 559-573.
82. Jack, T., L. L. Brockman & E. M. Meyerowitz. 1992. The homeotic gene APETALA3 of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a MADS box and is expressed in petals and stamens. Cell 68: 683-697.
83. _, L. E. Sieburth & E. M. Meyerowitz. 1993. Genes that control flower development in Arabidopsis. Semin. Developm. Biol. 4: 51-63.
84. _, G. L. Fox & E. M. Meyerowitz. 1994. Arabidopsis homeotic gene APETALA3 ectopic expression: Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation determine floral organ identity. Cell 76: 703-716.
85. Johnston, M. O. & D. J. Schoen. 1996. Correlated evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression: An experimental study of nine populations of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 50: 1478-1491.
86. Jones, C. S. 1988. Positional influences on leaf development in a wild and cultivated Cucurbita species. Amer. J. Bot. 75: 33.
87. _. 1992. Comparative ontogeny of a wild cucurbit and its derived cultivar. Evolution 46: 1827-1847.
88. _. 1993. Heterochrony and heteroblastic leaf development in two subspecies of Cucurbita argyrosperma (Cucurbitaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 80: 778-795.
89. Jordan, B. R. & R. G. Anthony. 1993. Floral homeotic genes: Isolation, characterization and expression during floral development. Pp. 93-116 in B. R. Jordan (ed.), The molecular biology of flowering. CAB International, Wallingford, England.
90. Kampny, C. M. & E. M. Harris. 1998. Heterochrony: The basis of floral shape evolution. Amer. J. Bot. Supplement: 4.
91. _, T. A. Dickinson & N. G. Dengler. 1993. Quantitative comparison of floral development in Veronica chamaedrys and Veronicastrum virginicum (Scrophulariaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 80: 449-460.
92. _, _ & _. 1994. Quantitative floral development in Pseudolysimachion (Scrophulariaceae): Intraspecific variation and comparison with Veronica and Veronicastrum. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 1343-1353.
93. Kaplan, D. R. 1970. Comparative foliar histogenesis in Acorus calamus and its bearing on the phyllode theory of monocotyledonous leaves. Amer. J. Bot. 57: 331-361.
94. _. 1973a. Comparative developmental analysis of the heteroblastic leaf series of axillary shoots of Acorus calamus L. (Araceae). Cellule 69: 253-290.
95. _. 1973b. The monocotyledons: Their evolution and comparative biology. VII. The problem of leaf morphology and evolution in the monocotyledons. Quart. Rev. Biol. 48: 437-457.
96. _. 1980. Heteroblastic leaf development in Acacia: Morphological and morphogenetic implications. Cellule 73: 135-203.
97. _. 1984. The concept of homology and its central role in the elucidation of plant systematic relation. Pp. 51-70 in T. Duncan & T. F. Stuessy (eds.), Cladistics: Perspectives on the reconstruction of evolutionary history. Columbia University Press, New York.
98. Kellogg, E. A. 1990. Ontogenetic studies of florets in Poa (Gramineae): Allometry and heterochrony. Evolution 44: 1978-1989.
99. Kirchoff, B. K. 1983. Allometric growth of the flowers in five genera of the Marantaceae and in Canna (Cannaceae). Bot. Gaz. 144: 110-118.
100. _. 1988. Floral ontogeny and evolution in the ginger group of the Zingiberales. Pp. 45-56 in P. Leins, S. C. Tucker & P. K. Endress (eds.), Aspects of floral development. J. Cramer, Berlin.
101. _. 1991. Homeosis in the flowers of the Zingiberales. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 833-837.
102. Klingenberg, C. P. 1996. Individual variation of ontogenies: A longitudinal study of growth and timing. Evolution 50: 2412-2428.
103. _. 1998. Heterochrony and allometry: The analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol. Rev. 73: 79-123.
104. _ & J. R. Spence. 1994. Heterochrony and allometry: Lessons from the water strider genus Limnoporus. Evolution 47: 1834-1853.
105. Kluge, A. G. 1985. Ontogeny and phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 1: 13-27.
106. _. 1988. The characterization of ontogeny. Pp. 57-81 in C. J. Humphries (ed.), Ontogeny and systematics. Columbia University Press, New York.
107. Koornneef, M., C. J. Hanhart & J. H. Van der Veen. 1991. A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molec. Gen. Genet. 229: 57-66.
108. Krol, A. R. v. d. & N.-H. Chua. 1993. Flower development in Petunia. Pl. Cell 5: 1195-1203.
109. Lammers, T. G. 1990. Sequential paedomorphosis among the endemic Hawaiian Lobelioideae (Campanulaceae). Taxon 39: 206-211.
110. Langer, R. H. M. & D. Wilson. 1965. Environmental control of cleistogamy in prairie grass (Bromus unioloides HBK). New Phytol. 65: 80-85.
111. Lee, C. W., H. T. Erickson & J. Janick. 1979. Cleistogamy in Salpiglossis sinuata. Amer. J. Bot. 66: 626-632.
112. Lee, I., M. J. Aukerman, S. L. Gore, K. N. Lohman, S. D. Michaels, L. M. Weaver, M. C. John, K. A. Feldmann & R. M. Amasino. 1994. Isolation of LUMINIDEPENDENS: A gene involved in the control of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Pl. Cell 6: 75-83.
113. Lee, M. P. N. 1988. Cell cycle control genes in fission yeast and mammalian cells. Trends Genet. 4: 287-290.
114. Lehmann, N. L. & R. Sattler. 1996. Staminate floral development in Begonia cucullata var. hookeri and three double-flowering begonia cultivars, examples of homeosis. Canad. J. Bot. 74: 1729-1741.
115. Li, P. & M. O. Johnston. 1999. Evolution of meiosis timing during floral development. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 266: 185-190.
116. Lieu, S. M. & R. Sattler. 1976. Leaf development in Begonia hispida Schott var. cucullifera Irmsch. with special reference to vascular organization. Canad. J. Bot. 54: 2108-2121.
117. Lord, E. M. 1979. The development of cleistogamous and chasmogamous flowers in Lamium amplexicaule (Labiatae): An example of heteroblastic inflorescence development. Bot. Gaz. 140: 39-50.
118. _. 1982. Floral morphogenesis in Lamium amplexicaule L. (Labiatae) with a model for the evolution of the cleistogamous flower. Bot. Gaz. 143: 63-72.
119. _ & J. P. Hill. 1987. Evidence for heterochrony in the evolution of plant form. Pp. 47-70 in R. A. Raff & E. C. Raff (eds.), Development as an evolutionary process. Alan R. Liss, New York.
120. _, K. J. Eckard & W. Crone. 1989. Development of the dimorphic anthers in Collomia grandiflora: Evidence for heterochrony in the evolution of the cleistogamous anther. J. Evol. Biol. 2: 81-93.
121. _, W. Crone & J. P. Hill. 1994. Timing of events during flower organogenesis: Arabidopsis as a model system. Curr. Topics Developm. Biol. 29: 325-356.
122. MacIntyre, J. P. & C. R. Lacroix. 1996. Comparative development of perianth and androecial primordia of the single flower and the homeotic double-flowered mutant in Hibiscus rosa-sinensis (Makvaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 74: 1871-1882.
123. Maier, U. & R. Sattler. 1977. The structure of the epiphyllous appendages of Begonia hispida Schott var. cucullifera Irmsch. Canad. J. Bot. 55: 264-280.
124. Mandel, M. A. & M. F. Yanofsky. 1995. A gene triggering flower formation in Arabidopsis. Nature 377: 522-524.
125. _, J. L. Bowman, S. A. Kempin, H. Ma, E. M. Meyerowitz & M. F. Yanofsky. 1992. Manipulation of flower structure in transgenic tobacco. Cell 71: 133-143.
126. Martin, C. 1996. Transcription factors and the manipulation of plant traits. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 7: 130-138.
127. Marx, G. A. 1987. A suit of mutants that modify pattern formation in pea leaves. Pl. Mol. Biol. Rep. 5: 311-335.
128. Mayers, A. M. & E. M. Lord. 1983a. Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorata. I. A growth rate study. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 1548-1555.
129. _ & _. 1983b. Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorata. II. An organographic study. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 1556-1563.
130. McKinney, M. L. 1988a. Classifying heterochrony: Allometry, size, and time. Pp. 17-34 in M. L. McKinney (ed.), Heterochrony in evolution: A multidisciplinary approach. Plenum Press, New York.
131. _. 1988b. Heterochrony in evolution: An overview. Pp. 327-340 in M. L. McKinney (ed.), Heterochrony in evolution: A multidisciplinary approach. Plenum Press, New York.
132. _. 1999. Heterochrony: Beyond words. Paleobiology 25: 149-153.
133. _, ed. 1988. Heterochrony in evolution: A multidisciplinary approach. Plenum Press, New York.
134. _. & K. J. McNamara. 1991. Heterochrony: The evolution of ontogeny. Plenum Press, New York.
135. McLellan, T. 1990. Development of differences in leaf shape in Begonia dregei (Begoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 77: 323-337.
136. _. 1993. The roles of heterochrony and heteroblasty in the diversification of leaf shapes in Begonia dregei (Begoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 80: 796-804.
137. _ & N. G. Dengler. 1995. Pattern and form in repeated elements in the development of simple leaves of Begonia dregei. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 156: 581-589.
138. McNamara, K. J. 1993. Inside evolution: 1992 presidential address. J. Roy. Soc. W. Australia. 76: 3-12.
139. _, ed. 1995. Evolutionary change and heterochrony. John Wiley, New York.
140. Merrill, E. K. 1979. Comparison of ontogeny of three types of leaf architecture in Sorbus L. (Rosaceae). Bot. Gaz. 140: 328-337.
141. Minter, T. C. & E. M. Lord. 1983. A comparison of cleistogamous and chasmogamous floral development in Collomia grandiflora Dougl. ex Lindl. (Polemoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 70: 1499-1508.
142. Mosbrugger, V. 1995. Heterochrony and the evolution of land plants. Pp. 93-105 in K. J. McNamara (ed.), Evolutionary change and heterochrony. John Wiley, New York.
143. Murfet, I. C. & J. B. Reid. 1993. Developmental mutants. Pp. 165-216 in R. Casey & D. R. Davies (eds.), Peas: Genetics, molecular biology, and biotechnology. CAB International, Wallingford, England.
144. Niklas, K. J. 1994. Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
145. _. 1997. The evolutionary biology of plants. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
146. O'Grady, R. T. 1985. Ontogenetic sequences and the phylogenetics of flatworms. Cladistics 1: 159-170.
147. Parichy, D. M., H. B. Shaffer & M. Mangel. 1992. Heterochrony as a unifying theme in evolution and development. Evolution 46: 1252-1254.
148. Perrier de la Bathie, H. 1946. Celastracées. In H. Humbert (ed.), Flore de Madagascar et des Comores. Impr. Officielle, Tananarive, Madagascar.
149. Philipson, W. R. 1971. Shoot differentiation in the Araliaceae of New Zealand. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 50A: 188-195.
150. Poethig, R. S. 1988. Heterochronic mutations affecting shoot development in maize. Genetics 119: 959-973.
151. Posluszny, U., R. Sattler, J. P. Hill, M. K. Komaki, J. M. Gerrath, N. Lehmann & B. K. Kirchoff. 1990. Homeosis and the evolution of plants. Pp. 447-454 in E. C. Dudley (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, vol. 1. Dioscorides Press, University of Maryland, College Park.
152. Purugganan, M. D. 1996. Evolution of development: Molecules, mechanisms and phylogenetics. TREE 11: 5-7.
153. _, S. D. Rounsley, R. J. Schmidt & M. F. Yanofsky. 1995. Molecular evolution of flower development: Diversification of the plant MADS-box regulatory gene family. Genetics 140: 345-356.
154. Raff, R. A. 1996. The shape of life: Genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
155. _ & T. C. Kaufman. 1983. Embryos, genes, and evolution. Macmillan, New York.
156. _ & G. A. Wray. 1989. Heterochrony: Developmental mechanisms and evolutionary results. J. Evol. Biol. 2: 409-434.
157. _ & E. C. Raff, eds. 1987. Development as an evolutionary process. Alan R. Liss, New York.
158. Ray, P. M. & H. F. Chisaki. 1957a. Studies on Amsinckia. II. Relationships among the primitive species. Amer. J. Bot. 44: 537-544.
159. _ & _. 1957b. Studies on Amsinckia. I. A synopsis of the genus, with a study of heterostyly in it. Amer. J. Bot. 44: 529-536.
160. Reilly, S. M. 1997. An integrative approach to heterochrony: The distinction between interspecific and intraspecific phenomena. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60: 119-143.
161. Rice, S. H. 1997. The analysis of ontogenetic trajectories: When a change in size or shape is not heterochrony. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 907-912.
162. Richards, J. H. 1983. Heteroblastic development in the water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes Solms. Bot. Gaz. 144: 247-259.
163. Richardson, M. K. 1995. Heterochrony and the phylotypic period. Developm. Biol. 172: 412-421.
164. Runions, C. J. & M. A. Geber. 1998. A heterochronic shift leading to self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana ssp. parviflora (Onagraceae). Amer. J. Bot. Supplement: 18.
165. Saedler, H. & P. Huijser. 1993. Molecular biology of flower development in Antirrhinum majus (snapdragon). Gene 135: 239-243.
166. Sattler, R. 1962. Zur frühen Infloreszenz-und Blütenentwicklung der Primulales sensu lato mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Stamen-Petalum Entwicklung. Botan. Jahrb. 81: 358-396.
167. _. 1988. Homeosis in plants. Amer. J. Bot. 75: 1606-1617.
168. _. 1992. Process morphology: Structural dynamics in development and evolution. Canad. J. Bot.70: 708-714.
169. _. 1994. Homology, homeosis, and process morphology in plants. Pp. 423-475 in B. K. Hall (ed.), Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
170. _ & U. Maier. 1977. Development of the epiphyllous appendages of Begonia hispida Schott var. cucullifera Irmsch.: Implications for comparative morphology. Canad. J. Bot. 55: 411-425.
171. Schneeberger, R. G., P. W. Becraft, S. Hake & M. Freeling. 1995. Ectopic expression of the knox homeo box gene rough sheath1 alters cell fate in the maize leaf. Genes Developm. 9: 2292-2304.
172. Schoen, D. J., M. O. Johnston, A. M. L'Heureux & J. V. Marsolais. 1997. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51: 1090-1099.
173. Schultz, E. A. & G. W. Haughn. 1991. LEAFY, a homeotic gene that regulates inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Pl. Cell 3: 771-781.
174. _ & _. 1993. Genetic analysis of the floral initiation process (FLIP) in Arabidopsis. Development 119: 745-765.
175. Schwarz-Sommer, Z., P. Huijser, W. Nacken, H. Saedler & H. Sommer. 1990. Genetic control of flower development by homeotic genes in Antirrhinum majus. Science 250: 931-936.
176. Sinha, N., S. Hake & M. Freeling. 1993. Genetic and molecular analysis of leaf development. Curr. Topics Developm. Biol. 28: 47-80.
177. Slatkin, M. 1987. Quantitative genetics of heterochrony. Evolution 41: 799-811.
178. Smith-Huerta, N. L. 1984. Development of flower form in an allotetraploid Clarkia and its parental diploid species. Amer. J. Bot. 71: 720-726.
179. Solbrig, O. T. & R. C. Rollons. 1977. The evolution of autogamy in species of the mustard genus Leavenworthia. Evolution 31: 265-281.
180. Stebbins, G. L. 1992. Comparative aspects of plant morphogenesis: A cellular, molecular, and evolutionary approach. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 589-598.
181. Sundberg, M. D. 1982. Petal-stamen initiation in the genus Cyclamen (Primulaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 69: 1707-1709.
182. Sung, Z. R., A. Belachew, S. Bai & R. Bertrand-Garcia. 1992. EMF, an Arabidopsis gene required for vegetative shoot development. Science 258: 1645-1647.
183. Takahashi, H. 1994. A comparative study of floral development in Trillium apetalon and T. kamtschaticum (Liliaceae). J. Pl. Res. 107: 237-243.
184. Takhtajan A. 1954. Voprosy Evolyutsionnoy Morfologii Rasteniy. Leningrad University, Leningrad.
185. _. 1976. Neoteny and the origin of flowering plants. Pp. 207-219 in C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Columbia University Press, New York.
186. _. 1991. Evolutionary trends in flowering plants. Columbia University, New York.
187. Tucker, S. C. 1984. Origin of symmetry in flowers. Pp. 351-394 in R. A. White & W. C. Dickison (eds.), Contemporary problems in plant anatomy. Academic Press, London.
188. _. 1987. Floral initiation and development in legumes. Pp. 183-239 in C. H. Stirtion (ed.). Advances in legume systematics, part 3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
189. _. 1988. Heteromorphic flower development in Neptunia pubescens, a mimosoid legume. Amer. J. Bot. 75: 205-224.
190. Veit, B., R. J. Schmidt, S. Hake & M. F. Yanofsky. 1993. Maize floral development: New genes and old mutants. Pl. Cell 5: 1205-1215.
191. Weigel, D. 1995. The genetics of flower development: From floral induction to ovule morphogenesis. Annual Rev. Genet. 29: 19-39.
192. _ & E. M. Meyerowitz. 1993. Genetic hierarchy controlling flower development. Pp. 93-107 in M. Bernfeld (ed.), Molecular basis of morphogenesis. Wiley-Liss, New York.
193. _ & _. 1994. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell 78: 203-209.
194. _ & O. Nilsson. 1995. A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants. Nature 377: 495-500.
195. _, J. Alvarez, D. R. Smyth, M. F. Yanofsky & E. M. Meyerowitz. 1992. LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell 69: 843-859.
196. Whaley, W. G. & C. Y. Whaley. 1942. A developmental analysis of inherited leaf patterns in Tropaeolum. Amer. J. Bot. 29: 195-200.
197. Wiltshire, R. J. E., I. C. Murfet & J. B. Reid. 1994. The genetic control of heterochrony: Evidence from developmental mutants of Pisum sativum L. J. Evol. Biol. 7: 447-465.
198. Wyatt, R. 1983. Pollinator-plant interactions and the evolution of breeding systems. Pp. 51-95 in L. Real (ed.), Pollination biology. Academic Press, New York.
199. Yang, C.-H., L.-J. Chen & Z. R. Sung. 1995. Genetic regulation of shoot development in ArabidopsisL role of the EMF genes. Dev. Biol. 169: 421-435.
200. Young, J. P., T. A. Dickinson & N. G. Dengler. 1995. A morphometric analysis of heterophyllous leaf development in Ranunculus flabellaris. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 156: 590-602.
201. Zagotta, M. T., S. Shannon & C. Jacobs. 1992. Early-flowering mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Aust. J. Pl. Physiol. 19: 411-418.
202. Zelditch, M. L. & W. L. Fink. 1996. Heterochrony and heterotopy: stability and innovation in the evolution of form. Paleobiology 22: 241-254.
203. Zimmermann, W. 1959. Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen. Ed. 2. G. Fischer, Stuttgart.
204. Zopfi, H.-J. 1995. Life history variation and infraspecific heterochrony in Rhinanthus glacialis (Scrophulariaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 198: 209-233.