Online notes: Differential effects of studying complete or partial graphically organized notes

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 293-312

  Katayama, Andrew D ^a   Crooks, Steven M ^b  

^a UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic study notes; Graphic organizers; Note taking

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242267465     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220970309602067     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alvermann, D. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 44-48.
2. Alvermann, D. (1986). Graphic organizers: Cuing devices for comprehending and remembering main ideas. In J. F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (pp. 210-226). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3. Anderson, J. T., & Armbruster, B. B. (1985). Studying strategies and their implications for textbook design. In J. D. Duffy & R. Waller (Eds.), Designing usable texts (pp. 159-177). New York: Academic Press.
4. Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1982). Idea mapping: The technique and its use in the classroom, or simulating the "ups" and "downs" of reading comprehension. Reading Education Report #36. Urbana: University of Illinois Center for the Study of Reading.
5. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
6. Barron, R. F. (1969). The use of vocabulary as an advance organizer. In H. L. Herber & R. T. Vacca (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: First year report. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Reading and Language Arts Center.
7. Bransford, J. D. (1979). Human cognition: Learning, understanding and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8. Corkill, A. J. (1992). Advance organizers: Facilitators of recall. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 33-66.
9. Crooks, S. M., & Katayama, A. D. (2002). Effects of on-line note-taking format on the comprehension of electronic text. Research in the Schools, 9, 22-33.
10. DiVesta, J. G., & Gray, S. G. (1972). Listening and notetaking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8-14.
11. Dreher, M. J., & Guthrie, J. T. (1990). Cognitive processes in textbook chapter search tasks. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 323-339.
12. Earle, R. A. (1969). Use of structured overview in mathematics classes. In H. L. Herber & P. L. Sanders (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: First-year report. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
13. Eggen, P. D., Kauchak, D. P., & Kirk, S. (1978). The effect of hierarchical cues on the learning of concepts from prose materials. The Journal of Experimental Education, 46, 7-11.
14. Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note-taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 321-325.
15. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
16. Grant, R., & Davey, B. (1991). How do headings affect text-processing? Reading Research and Instruction, 31, 12-21.
17. Guri-Rozenblit, S. (1988). The interrelationships between diagrammatic representations and verbal explanations from social science texts. Instructional Science, 17, 219-234.
18. Guthrie, J. T. (1988). Locating information in documents: Examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 178-199.
19. Hanf, M. B. (1971). Mapping: A technique for translating reading into thinking. Journal of Reading, 14, 225-230.
20. Haynie, W. J. (1994). Effects of multiple-choice and short-answer tests on delayed retention learning. Journal of Technology Education, 6, 1-13.
21. Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56, 473-495.
22. Holley, C. D., Dansareau, D. F., & McDonald, B.A. (1981). Employing intact and embedded headings to facilitate long-term retention of text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 227-236.
23. Holliday, W. G., Brunner, L. L., & Donais, E. L. (1977). Differential cognitive and affective responses to flow diagrams in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 129-138.
24. Howell, D. C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
25. Iaccino, J. F., & Sowa, S. J. (1988). Bizarre mnemonic aids on paired associate retention as a function of context, delay, and presentation pace. (Report No. CS-009-068). Illinois. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED292065).
26. Jones, B. F., Pierce, J., & Hunter, B. (1989). Teaching students to construct graphic representations. Educational Leadership, 46 (4), 21-25.
27. Kardash, C. M. (1988). Effects of cognitive style and immediate testing on learning from lecture. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 360-364.
28. Katayama, A. D. & Crooks, S. M. (2001). Examining the effects of notetaking format on achievement when students construct and study computerized notes. Learning Assistance Review Journal, 6, 5-23.
29. Katayama, A. D. & Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting students "partially" involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 119-133.
30. Katayama, A. D., Robinson, D. H., Kiewra, K. A., Dubois, N., & Jonassen, D. (2001). Biases with adjunct display construction and testing. Journal of Research in Education, 11, 54-61.
31. Kiess, H. O. (1996). Statistical concepts for the behavioral sciences, (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
32. Kiewra, K. A. (1985), Providing the instructor's notes: An effective addition to student note taking. Educational Psychologist, 20, 33-39.
33. Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., & Lewis, L. B. (1987). Qualitative aspects of note taking and their relationship with information processing ability. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 80, 595-597.
34. Kintsch, E., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Strategies to promote active learning from texts: Individual differences in background knowledge. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 3, 141-151.
35. Koran, J., & Koran, M. (1980). Interaction of learner characteristics with pictorial adjuncts in learning from science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 477-483.
36. Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8 357-371.
37. Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem solving transfer. In D. Berliner., and R. Calfee (Eds.). Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47-62). New York: Macmillan.
38. McMillan, J. H. (1996). Educational Research: Fundamentals for the consumer (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
39. Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology; 70, 514-522.
40. Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 34-38.
41. Quade, A. M. (1996). An assessment of retention and depth of processing associated with notetaking using traditional pencil and paper and on-line notepad during computer-delivered instruction. Proceedings of the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Indianapolis, IN: AECT.
42. Robinson, D. H., Katayama, A. K., Dubois, N. F., & Devaney, T. (1998). Interactive effects of graphic organizers and delayed review on concept application. The Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 17-31.
43. Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 455-467.
44. Robinson, D. H., & Schraw, G. (1994). Computational efficiency through visual argument: Do graphic organizers communicate relations in text too effectively? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 399-415.
45. Russell, I. J., Caris, T. N., Harris, G. D., & Hendricson, W. D. (1983). Effects of three types of lecture notes on medical student achievement. Journal of Medical Education, 58, 627-636.
46. Shavelson, R. J. (1988). Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.), Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
47. Stevens, J. P. (1999). Intermediate statistics: A modem approach (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Thomas, G. S. (1978). Use of students notes and lecture summaries as study guides for recall. Journal of Educational Research, 71, 316-319.
49. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M, C, Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
50. Winn, W. D. (1988). Recall of the pattern, sequence, and names of concepts presented in instructional diagrams. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 375-386.
51. Zimmer, J. W. (1985). Text structure and retention of prose. The Journal of Experimental Education, 53, 230-233.