Kinetic Evaluation of Phenolase Activity of Tyrosinase Using Simplified Catalytic Reaction System

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 43, 2003, Pages 13034-13035

  Yamazaki, Shin Ichi ^a   Itoh, Shinobu ^a  

^a Osaka Prefecture University   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 QUINONE; CATECHOL; COPPER ION; HYDROXYLAMINE; META TYROSINE; MONOPHENOL MONOOXYGENASE; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; QUINONE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME KINETICS; ENZYME MECHANISM; OXIDATION; OXYGENATION;

BORATES; CATALYSIS; CATECHOLS; HYDROXYLAMINE; KINETICS; MONOPHENOL MONOOXYGENASE; OXYGEN; PHENOLS;

EID: 0142214624     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja036425d     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. (a) Solomon, E. I.; Sundaram, U. M.; Machonkin, T. E. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2563-2605.
2. (b) Land, E. J.; Ramsden, C. A.; Riley, P. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 300-308.
3. (a) Solomon, E. I.; Chen, P.; Metz, M.; Lee, S.; Palmer, A. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4570-4590.
4. (b) Decker, H.; Tuczek, F. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25, 392-397.
5. (c) Decker, H.; Dillinger, R.; Tuczek, F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1591-1595.
6. (d) van Gelder, C. W.; Flurkey, W. H.; Wichers, H. J. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 1309-1323.
7. (e) Lerch, K. Life Chem. Rep. 1987, 5, 221-234.
8. Kitajima, N.; Fujisawa, K.; Moro-oka, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8975-8976.
9. (a) Wilcox, D. E.; Porras, A. G.; Hwang, Y. T.; Lerch, K.; Winker, M. E. ; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 4015-4027.
10. (b) Sánchez-Ferrer, A.; Rodrígues-López, J. N.; García-Cánovas, F.; García-Carmona, F. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1247, 1-11.
11. For recent kinetic studies on the phenolase and catecholase activities, see: (a) Haghbeen, K.; Tan, E. W. Anal. Biochem. 2003, 312, 23-32.
12. (b) Espin, J. C.; Varón, R.; Fenoll, L. G.; Gilabert, M. A.; García-Ruiz, P. A.; Tudela, J.; García-Cánovas, F. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 1270-1279.
13. (c) Espin, J. C.; García-Ruiz, P. A.; Tudela, J.; Varón, R.; García-Cánovas, F. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 2968-2975.
14. For spectroscopic approaches to the catalytic intermediates, see: (a) van Gastel, M.; Bubacco, L.; Groenen, E. J. J.; Vijgenboom, E.; Canters, G. W. FEBS Lett. 2000, 474, 228-232.
15. (b) Bubacco, L.; Vijgenboom, E.; Gobin, C.; Tepper, A. W. J. W.; Salgado, J.; Canters, G. W. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2000, 8, 27-35.
16. (c) Bubacco, L.; Salgado, J.; Tepper, A. W. J. W.; Vijgenboom, E.; Canters, G. W. FEBS Lett. 1999, 442, 215-220.
17. For geometric discussions on each step in the catalytic mechanism, see: (a) Gerdemann, C.; Eicken, C.; Krebs, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 183-191.
18. (b) Klabunde, T.; Eicken, C.; Sacchettini, J. C.; Krebs, B. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998, 5, 1084-1090.
19. Karlin, K. D.; Hayes, J. C.; Gultneh, Y.; Cruse, R. W.; McKown, J. W.; Hutchinson, J. P.; Zubieta, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2121-2128.
20. Holland, P. L.; Rodgers, K. R.; Tolman, W. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1139-1142.
21. (a) Itoh, S.; Kumei, H.; Taki, M.; Nagatomo, S.; Kitagawa, T.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6708-6709.
22. (b) Itoh, S.; Fukuzumi, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 75, 2081-2095.
23. (a) Santagosfini, L.; Gullotti, M.; Monzani, E.; Casella, L.; Dillinger, R.; Tuczek, F. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 519-522.
24. (b) Mirica, L. M.; Vance, M.; Rudd, D. J.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Solomon, E. I.; Stack, T. D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9332-9333.
25. Itoh, S. In Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry-11; Que, L., Jr., Tolman, W. B., Eds; Elsevier: Oxford, 2003. In press.
26. When hydrogen peroxide was added into a solution of met-tyrosinase, the absorption band at 345 nm due to oxy-tyrosinase was generated (Figure S1). However, the absorption band readily disappeared when the solution was degassed. Thus, we could not perform single-turnover kinetic analysis on the reaction between oxy-tyrosinase and phenols.
27. (a) For reviews, see: James, T. D.; Sandanayake, K. R. A. S.; Shinkai, S. Supramol. Chem. 1995, 6, 141-157.
28. (b) Mochizuki, M.; Yamazaki, S.; Kano, K.; Ikeda, T. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1569, 35-44.
29. 2OH. It is, however, apparent that the enzymatic over oxidation of catechols to the quinones is not involved, since the catechol oxidation does not proceed at all in the present borate buffer system.
30. The detailed kinetic analysis is presented in Supporting Information (S3).
31. Nasir, M. S.; Cohen, B. I.; Karlin, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 2482-2494.
32. Rate-dependence on the oxidation potentials of phenols in the present enzymatic reaction is totally different from that observed in the oxidation reaction of neutral phenols (phenoxyl radical formation) by the peroxo complex which proceeds via a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) mechanism: Osako, T.; Ohkubo, K.; Taki, M.; Tachi, Y.; Fukuzumi, S.; Itoh, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11027-11033.