Compound self-motion perception induced by two kinds of optical motion

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 874-887

  Ito, Hiroyuki ^a   Fujimoto, Chisa ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; ROTATION; SELF CONCEPT;

HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; ROTATION; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 0142197058     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194821     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ANDERSEN, G. J., & BRAUNSTEIN, M. L. (1985). Induced self-motion in central vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 122-132.
2. BRANDT, T., DICHGANS, J., & KOENIG, E. (1973). Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Experimental Brain Research, 16, 476-491.
3. DUFFY, C. J., & WURTZ, R. H. (1993). An illusory transformation of optical flow fields. Vision Research, 33, 1481-1490.
4. GOGEL, W. C., & MACCRACKEN, P. J. (1979). Depth adjacency and induced motion. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 48, 343-350.
5. GRIGO, A., & LAPPE, M. (1998). Interaction of stereo vision and optic flow processing revealed by an illusory stimulus. Vision Research, 38, 281-290.
6. HOWARD, I. P. (1990). Spatial vision within egocentric and exocentric frames of reference. In S. R. Ellis (Ed.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 338-358). London: Taylor & Francis.
7. HOWARD, I. P., CHEUNG, B., & LANDOLT, J. (1988). Influence of vection axis and body posture on visually-induced self rotation. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development, 433, 15-1 to 15-8.
8. HOWARD, I. P., & HECKMANN, T. (1989). Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances and positions of two competing visual displays. Perception, 18, 657-667.
9. ITO, H., & SHIBAO, T. (1999). Motion direction distribution as a determinant of circular vection. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 89, 564-570.
10. JOHANSSON, G. (1977). Studies on visual perception of locomotion. Perception, 6, 365-376.
11. KANO, C. (1991). The perception of self-motion induced by peripheral visual information in sitting and supine postures. Ecological Psychology, 3, 241-252.
12. KITAZAKI, M., & SATO, T. (2003). Attentional modulation of self-motion perception. Perception, 32, 475-484.
13. LANKHEET, M. J., & VERSTRATEN, F. A. J. (1995). Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion. Vision Research, 35, 1401-1412.
14. LAPPE, M., & RAUSCHECKER, J. P. (1995). An illusory transformation in a model of optical flow processing. Vision Research, 35, 1619-1631.
15. MEESE, T. S., SMITH, V., & HARRIS, M. G. (1995). Induced motion may account for the illusory transformation of optic flow fields found by Duffy & Wurtz. Vision Research, 35, 981-984.
16. NAKAMURA, S., & SHIMOJO, S. (1998). Stimulus size and eccentricity in visually induced perception of horizontally translational self-motion. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 87, 659-663.
17. NAKAMURA, S., & SHIMOJO, S. (1999). Critical role of foreground stimuli in perceiving visually induced self-motion (vection). Perception, 28, 893-902.
18. NAKAMURA, S., & SHIMOJO, S. (2000). A slowly moving foreground can capture an observer's self-motion: A report of a new motion illusion. Inverted vection. Vision Research, 40, 2915-2923.
19. OHMI, M., & HOWARD, I. P. (1988). Effect of stationary objects on illusory forward self-motion induced by a looming display. Perception, 17, 5-12.
20. OHMI, M., HOWARD, I. P., & LANDOLT, J. P. (1987). Circular vection as a function of foreground-background relationships. Perception, 16, 17-22.
21. PACK, C., & MINGOLLA, E. (1998). Global induced motion and visual stability in an optic flow illusion. Vision Research, 38, 3083-3093.
22. PALMISANO, S. (1996). Perceiving self-motion in depth: The role of stereoscopic motion and changing-size cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1168-1176.
23. PALMISANO, S., GILLAM, B. J., & BLACKBURN, S. G. (2000). Globalperspective jitter improves vection in central vision. Perception, 29, 57-67.
24. TANAKA, K., FUKADA, Y., & SAITO, H. (1989). Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 62, 642-656.
25. TANAKA, K., & SAITO, H. (1989). Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 62, 626-641.
26. WANN, J. P., SWAPP, D., & RUSHTON, S. K. (2000). Heading perception and the allocation of attention. Vision Research, 40, 2533-2543.