Perceiving self-motion in depth: The role of stereoscopic motion and changing-size cues

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 1168-1176

  Palmisano, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030277164     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03207550     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ANDERSEN, G. J., & BRAUNSTEIN, M. L. (1985). Induced self-motion in central vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 122-132.
2. BENSON, A. J. (1990). Sensory functions and limitations of the vestibular system. In R. Warren & A. H. Wertheim (Eds.), The perception and control of self-motion (pp. 145-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. BRANDT, T., DICHGANS, J., & KOENIG, E. (1973). Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Experimental Brain Research, 16, 476-491.
4. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & ANDERSEN, G. J. (1981). Velocity gradients and relative depth perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 145-155.
5. FISHER, S. K., & CIUFFREDA, K. J. (1988). Accommodation and apparent distance. Perception, 17, 609-621.
6. GIBSON, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. GIBSON, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8. GIBSON, J. J., OLUM, P., & ROSENBLATT, F. (1955). Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 372-385.
9. GOGEL, W. C., & STURM, R. D. (1972). A comparison of accommodative and fusional convergence as cues to distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 166-168.
10. GORDON, D. A. (1965). Static and dynamic visual fields in human space perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 55, 1296-1303.
11. HEBBARD, F. W. (1962). Comparison of subjective and objective measurements of fixation disparity. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 52, 706-712.
12. HEEGER, D. J., & JEPSON, A. (1990). Visual perception of three-dimensional motion. Neural Computation, 2, 129-137.
13. HELD, R., DICHGANS, J., & BAUER, J. (1975). Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation. Vision Research, 15, 357-365.
14. HOCHBERG, C. B., & HOCHBERG, J. E. (1952). Familiar size and the perception of relative depth. Journal of Psychology, 34, 107-114.
15. HOWARD, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
16. KOENDERINK, J. J. (1990). Some theoretical aspects of optic flow. In R. Warren & A. H. Wertheim (Eds.), The perception and control of self-motion (pp. 53-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. KOENDERINK, J. J., & VAN DOORN, A. J. (1981). Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 71, 953-957.
18. KOENDERINK, J. J., & VAN DOORN, A. J. (1987). Facts on optic flow. Biological Cybernetics, 56, 247-254.
19. LEE, D. N. (1980). The optic flow field: The foundation of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 290, 169-179.
20. LEE, D. N., & ARONSON, E. (1974). Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 529-532.
21. LEE, D. N., & LISHMAN, J. R. (1975). Visual proprioceptive control of stance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 1, 87-95.
22. LISHMAN, J. R., & LEE, D. N. (1973). The autonomy of visual kinaes-thesis. Perception, 2, 287-294.
23. LONGUET-HIGGINS, H. C., & PRAZDNY, K. (1980). The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 208, 385-397.
24. MACH, E. (1875). Grundlinien der Lehre von den Bewegungsempfindungen [Basic principles for the study of motion perception]. Leipzig: Engelmann.
25. MITCHELL, A. M., & ELLERBROCK, V. J. (1955). Fixational disparity and the maintenance of fusion in the horizontal meridian. American Journal of Optometry, 32, 520-534.
26. MONEN, J., & BRENNER, E. (1994). Detecting changes in one's own velocity from the optic flow. Perception, 23, 681-690.
27. NAKAYAMA, K., & LOOMIS, J. M. (1974). Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: A hypothesis. Perception, 3, 63-80.
28. OHMI, M., & HOWARD, I. P. (1988). Effect of stationary objects on illusory forward self-motion induced by a looming display. Perception, 17, 5-12.
29. OHMI, M., HOWARD, I. P., & LANDOLT, J. P. (1987). Circularvection as a function of foreground-background relationships. Perception, 16, 17-22.
30. REGAN, D., & BEVERLEY, K. I. (1979). Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed into the same motion-in-depth stage. Vision Research, 19, 1331-1342.
31. REGAN, D., BEVERLEY, K. I., & CYNADER, M. (1979a). Stereoscopic subsystems for position in depth and for motion in depth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 204, 485-501.
32. REGAN, D., BEVERLEY, K. I., & CYNADER, M. (1979b). The visual perception of motion in depth. Scientific American, 241, 136-151.
33. RICHARDS, W., & MILLER, J. F., JR. (1969). Convergence as a cue to depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 317-320.
34. STEVENS, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153-181.
35. STOFFREGEN, T. A. (1985). Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 554-565.
36. TELFORD, L., & FROST, B. J. (1993). Factors affecting the onset and magnitude of linear vection. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 682-692.
37. TELFORD, L., SPRATLEY, J., & FROST, B. J. (1992). Linear vection in the central visual field facilitated by kinetic depth cues. Perception, 21, 337-349.
38. VAN DEN BERG, A. V. (1992). Robustness of perception of heading from optic flow. Vision Research, 32, 1285-1296.
39. VAN DEN BERG, A. V., & BRENNER, E. (1994a). Humans combine the optic flow with static depth cues for robust perception of heading. Vision Research, 34, 2153-2167.
40. VAN DEN BERG, A. V., & BRENNER, E. (1994b). Why two eyes are better than one for judgements of heading. Nature, 371, 700-702.
41. WARREN, W. H., & HANNON, D. J. (1988). Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow. Nature, 336, 162-163.
42. WARREN, W. H., MORRIS, M. W., & KALISH, M. (1988). Perception of translational heading from optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 646-660.