Varieties of interhemispheric inhibition, or how to keep a good hemisphere down

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 81-108

  Chiarello, Christine ^a   Maxfield, Lisa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; COGNITION; COGNITION DISORDERS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE;

EID: 0030074393     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1996.0006     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Andrews, R. J. (1991). Transhemispheric diaschisis: A review and comment. Stroke, 22, 943-949.
2. Banich, M. T., & Belger, A. (1990). Interhemispheric interaction: How do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task? Cortex, 26, 77-94.
3. Banich, M. T., & Karol, D. L. (1992). The sum of the parts does not equal the whole: Evidence from bihemispheric processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 763-784.
4. Banich, M. T., & Noll, E. L. (1993). Target detection in left and right hemispace: Effects of positional pre-cuing and type of background. Neuropsychologia, 31, 525-545.
5. Beeman, M. Semantic processing and coarse coding in the right hemisphere. Submitted for publication.
6. Zaidel, E., & Schweiger, A. (1984). On wrong hypotheses about the right hemisphere: Commentary on K. Patterson and D. Besner. Is the right hemisphere literate? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 351-64.