Low-risk palpable breast masses removed using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 186, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 362-367

  Fine, Richard E ^a   Whitworth, Pat W ^b   Kim, Julian A ^c   Harness, Jay K ^d   Boyd, Beth A ^a   Burak Jr , William E ^e  

^a Breast Center   (United States)

^b Nashville Breast Center   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d Univ California S Francisco E Bay   (United States)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Benign breast lesion; Breast biopsy; Fibroadenoma; Mammotome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOTOME HAND HELD BREAST BIOPSY SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; BIOPSY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; INSTRUMENTATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RISK FACTOR; VACUUM;

ADULT; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RISK FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; VACUUM;

EID: 0142182085     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00263-0     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Feuer E.J., Wun L.M., Boring C.C., et al. The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 85:1993;892-897.
2. National Library of Medicine. MEDLINEplus health information: fibrocystic breast disease. Available at: http://ww.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ ency/article/000912.htm. Accessed on April 10, 2002.
3. Houssami N., Cheung M.N., Dixon J.M. Fibroadenoma of the breast. Med J Aust. 174:2001;185-188.
4. Parker S.H., Jobe W.E., Dennis M.A., et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology. 187:1993;507-511.
5. Liberman L., Feng T.L., Dershaw D.D., et al. Ultrasound-guided core breast biopsy utility and cost-effectiveness. Radiology. 208:1998;717-723.
6. Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE, et al. The utility of ultrasonographically guided large core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:43-9.
7. Simsir A., Waisman J., Cangiarella J. Fibroadenoma with atypia causes of under- and overdiagnosis by aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol. 25:2001;278-284.
8. Saxe A., Phillips E., Orfanou P., Husain M. Role of sample adequacy in fine needle aspiration biopsy of palpable breast lesions. Am J Surg. 182:2001;369-371.
9. Verkooijen H.M., Peeters P.H., Borel Rinkes I.H., et al. Risk factors for cancellation of stereotactic large core needle biopsy on a prone biopsy table. Br J Radiol. 74:2001;1007-1012.
10. Burak W.E., Owens K.E., Tighe M.B., et al. Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg. 135:2000;700-703.
11. Liberman L., Dershaw D.D., Glassman J.R., et al. Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology. 203:1997;151-157.
12. Dershaw D.D., Morris E.A., Liberman L., Abramson A.F. Nondiagnostic stereotactic core breast biopsy results of rebiopsy. Radiology. 198:1996;3133-3315.
13. Fine R.E., Israel P.Z., Walker L.C., et al. A prospective study of the removal rate of imaged breast lesion by an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy probe system. Am J Surg. 182:2001;335-340.
14. Perez-Fuentes J.A., Longobardi I.R., Acosta V.F., et al. Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy preliminary experience in Venezuela. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 177:2001;1459-1463.
15. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 3rd ed:1998;ACR Publications, Reston, VA.