Barriers to the involvement of clients in family planning service development: Lessons learnt from experience

Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 199-203

  Baraitser, Paula ^a   Blake, Geraldine ^b   Brown, Kirsty Collander ^b   Piper, Johanna ^a  

^a Southwark Primary Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

^b GAP Technologies Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; COOPERATION; EXPERIENCE; FAMILY PLANNING; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PATIENT CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; STAFF; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT HEALTH SERVICES; ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY; ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; OFFICE VISITS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0142087903     PISSN: 14711893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1783/147118903101198088     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Social Exclusion Unit. Teenage pregnancy. London: HMSO, 1999.
2. Department of Health. The national strategy for sexual health and HIV. London: Department of Health, 2001.
3. Department of Health. The new NHS: modern, dependable. Cm 3807. London: Stationery Office, 1997.
4. Department of Health. Patient and public involvement in the new NHS. London: Department of Health, 2000; 3-4.
5. Public Engagement Toolkit for Primary Care Groups. NHS Executive Northern and Yorkshire, 1999.
6. Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1667-1676.
7. Dougall A, Russell A, Rubin G, et al. Rethinking patient satisfaction: patient experiences of an open access flexible sigmoidoscopy service. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 53-62.
8. Avis M, Bond M, Arthur A. Questioning patient satisfaction: an empirical investigation in two outpatient clinics. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 85-92.
9. Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 1351-1359.
10. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 509-516.
11. Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1829-1843.
12. Harris J, Westerby M, Hill T, et al. User satisfaction: measurement and interpretation. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2001; 27: 41-45.
13. Egg Research and Consultancy. Someone with a smile would be your best bet. Report commissioned by Brook Advisory Centres, London, 1998.
14. Egg Research and Consultancy. You think they won't tell anyone, well you HOPE they won't. Report commissioned by Brook and Royal College of General Practitioners, London, 1999.
15. Whitmore W. To tell the truth: working with oppressed groups in participatory approaches to inquiry. In: Realoz P (ed.), Participation in human inquiry. London: Sage, 1994.
16. Aggleton P, Oliver C, Rivers K. Reducing the rate of teenage conceptions: the implications of research into young people, sex, sexuality and relationships. London: Health Education Authority, 1998.
17. Harden A, Ogden J. Sixteen to nineteen year olds use of and beliefs about contraceptive services. Br J Fam Plann 1999, 24: 141-144.
18. Pitts M, Burtney E, Dobraszczyc U. 'There is no shame in it anymore': how providers of sexual health advice view young people's sexuality. Health Educ Res 1996; 11: 1-9.
19. Wilson J. Acknowledging the expertise of patients and their organisations. BMJ 1999; 319: 771-772.
20. Baraitser P, Fettiplace R, Dolan F, et al. Quality mainstream services with proactive and targeted outreach: a model of contraceptive service provision for young people. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2002; 28: 90-94.